Anonymous wrote:Sigh, DCUM's pocket delusion that DCPS attracts millions of Maryland students, because it is so great, just because one of You'll see a kid get out of a his Grandmother's (maryland-plated) car on monday after spending the weekend at her house.
Anonymous wrote:Sigh, DCUM's pocket delusion that DCPS attracts millions of Maryland students, because it is so great, just because one of You'll see a kid get out of a his Grandmother's (maryland-plated) car on monday after spending the weekend at her house.
Anonymous wrote:I'm new to DC schools and walk my child to school, so I'm not noticing the license plates, but most likely we will be driving next year and I guarantee you that I, for one, will have no problem alerting the school if it seems someone is always driving up with non-DC plates. I don't have DC plates and I wouldn't have a problem at all if someone reported me (although mine are from Maine so it's ok with me if someone thinks I'm commuting from Maine - I'd just say "Yes, I'm THAT motivated!".
Either you have a good explanation for your non-DC plates and you will happily continue to bring your child to that school, or you were not honest on your application about where you live and you either did know or should have known that that might come out some day.
So you can count one (and I have a hunch a LOT more) DCUM'er who is *not* just talking about it here but not doing anything about it. If I see it, I'll do something about it.
.
Anonymous wrote:All of this whining about cheaters is ridiculous. Instead of reporting the so-called cheaters, people whimp out and post on DCUM- home to whiners-not-doers. Also, all of the suggested investigating would be awful for immigrant families who don't have tax returns and all of the "documents" you all want to force people to show to prove their residency status, but they very well do reside where in the city.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
maybe, but based on previous threads, sounds like there are still some address cheaters at janney, just not the pg county type, but the multiple house owning lawyer type using their rental property addresses.
If they're paying property tax on the rental, how is that not legitimate?
Anonymous wrote:I think it's laziness and unwillingness to disturb the kids. I think some of the principals see their mission as one to educate and care for kids with a blind eye to which kids. It's hard to think about kicking out a sweet little three-year-old who otherwise might be in some wretched daycare center.
Not that this is right, of course.
Anonymous wrote:
maybe, but based on previous threads, sounds like there are still some address cheaters at janney, just not the pg county type, but the multiple house owning lawyer type using their rental property addresses.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Remember all the students you might lose doesn't mean you will gain them back with a meighborhood enrollee. There's a lengthy process that's in the favor of the accused. The appeal process is a monster; the continuancy allowance can go on for years. By the time ceryain rulings were handed down the child has graduated from DCPS.
We are a city of lawyers and this hasn't become a cash cow, wonder why? It ain't worth it.
it might be a lenghty process but if you make the cheaters pay tuition for the months-years they have unlawfully be in DCPS that would discourage them from dragging things on, and maybe even from cheating. now if they are caught they are simply asked to leave the school. DCPS just need to catch a few cheaters and charge them all the back tuition (and get the money) and make them an example.