Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 47% isn't one solid, unchanging group, genius. People access government services when they need them -- until they hit 65 and tap Medicare and Social Security. Then we're all in the 47%.
Who are you talking to genius? And once again, he was referring to the 47% committed to voting once again for the Hope and Change....not the lies that you continue to spew.
Except that's not actually what he said.
It isn't anywhere CLOSE to what he actually said. He said those people feel "entitled" to be "dependent on government" and that they are "victims."
That group, by the way, includes active-duty military serving in harm's way (since their combat pay is excluded from taxes). How DARE he insult America's armed forces? First he leaves any mention of the war out of his acceptance speech, then he insults them by accusing them of having a victim mentality?
And he wants to be PRESIDENT of this country?
Oh stop pretending you know what you're talking about. You have no idea the tax issues related to active duty, and spare us the faux outrage, no one's buying it.
It's so funny how everyone notes his leaving out Afghan., but how he most assuredly wants to lead us into a 3rd war. Could you make up your mind please and get back to us when you do?
On the contrary I'm an expert in tax policy. But you keep on whiffing there. Combat pay is non-taxable. The end.
As for your second point, it's completely consistent to connect the omission of Afghanistan from a major policy speech accepting the Republican nomination with an utter lack of competence in foreign/military affairs that might get us into another unnecessary conflict. As Grover Norquist says, he'll do what he is told. That's the scary thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe he should spend some time hobnobbing with celebs like Obama, champion of the poor (vomit)
Why do you hate the poor? And what the hell is wrong with you?
Oh, lord. Settle and read more carefully. The point is that Obama spends tons of time with fancy celebrities, laughing over cocktails etc while claiming that he only has the average person's interests at heart. The culture of political celebrity at its worst. Sure, Romney's not polished, but at least he's not spouting pop culture nonsense on "The View" while claiming to be fighting tirelessly for America's needy.
Oh, please. You really think that Obama does nothing more than gad about with celebrities?? Give me a break.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe he should spend some time hobnobbing with celebs like Obama, champion of the poor (vomit)
Why do you hate the poor? And what the hell is wrong with you?
Oh, lord. Settle and read more carefully. The point is that Obama spends tons of time with fancy celebrities, laughing over cocktails etc while claiming that he only has the average person's interests at heart. The culture of political celebrity at its worst. Sure, Romney's not polished, but at least he's not spouting pop culture nonsense on "The View" while claiming to be fighting tirelessly for America's needy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Maybe he should spend some time hobnobbing with celebs like Obama, champion of the poor (vomit)
Why do you hate the poor? And what the hell is wrong with you?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 47% isn't one solid, unchanging group, genius. People access government services when they need them -- until they hit 65 and tap Medicare and Social Security. Then we're all in the 47%.
Who are you talking to genius? And once again, he was referring to the 47% committed to voting once again for the Hope and Change....not the lies that you continue to spew.
Except that's not actually what he said.
It isn't anywhere CLOSE to what he actually said. He said those people feel "entitled" to be "dependent on government" and that they are "victims."
That group, by the way, includes active-duty military serving in harm's way (since their combat pay is excluded from taxes). How DARE he insult America's armed forces? First he leaves any mention of the war out of his acceptance speech, then he insults them by accusing them of having a victim mentality?
And he wants to be PRESIDENT of this country?
Oh stop pretending you know what you're talking about. You have no idea the tax issues related to active duty, and spare us the faux outrage, no one's buying it.
It's so funny how everyone notes his leaving out Afghan., but how he most assuredly wants to lead us into a 3rd war. Could you make up your mind please and get back to us when you do?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The 47% isn't one solid, unchanging group, genius. People access government services when they need them -- until they hit 65 and tap Medicare and Social Security. Then we're all in the 47%.
Who are you talking to genius? And once again, he was referring to the 47% committed to voting once again for the Hope and Change....not the lies that you continue to spew.
Except that's not actually what he said.
It isn't anywhere CLOSE to what he actually said. He said those people feel "entitled" to be "dependent on government" and that they are "victims."
That group, by the way, includes active-duty military serving in harm's way (since their combat pay is excluded from taxes). How DARE he insult America's armed forces? First he leaves any mention of the war out of his acceptance speech, then he insults them by accusing them of having a victim mentality?
And he wants to be PRESIDENT of this country?
Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I just feel more comfortable with a man like Romney--he just looks like a president should. And I like money! I am Mormon, it's true--and I went to BYU. I don't care about the Supreme Court appointees being anti-abortion. I have all sons--wish I had 6 like Anne! I would hope that they will do as they were raised to and marry a girl in that situation. I do not feel comfortable with a person like Obama just on general principle--he isn't a typical black so race has nothing to do with it. I think most Romney supporters would agree with me. People wouldn't want to go out and have a beer with me anyway, as I am Mormon, of course I don't drink!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Honestly, I just feel more comfortable with a man like Romney--he just looks like a president should. And I like money! I am Mormon, it's true--and I went to BYU. I don't care about the Supreme Court appointees being anti-abortion. I have all sons--wish I had 6 like Anne! I would hope that they will do as they were raised to and marry a girl in that situation. I do not feel comfortable with a person like Obama just on general principle--he isn't a typical black so race has nothing to do with it. I think most Romney supporters would agree with me. People wouldn't want to go out and have a beer with me anyway, as I am Mormon, of course I don't drink!
What 'kind of person' is Obama that you are not comfortable with?
I am pretty sure this is sarcasm.