Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:I'm still confused about his comments on bringing home the troops from Afghanistan. Was he saying that we should be bringing them home sooner or that Obama should just not telescope our intentions by making the date clear?
I'm so baffled by all this. The Republicans don't think Obama is tough enough on China or Iran but they think Obama is too tough on Afghanistan and should bring the troops home?! Or are they just generally avoiding mention of it at all because no one is happy about the war in Afghanistan?
So hard to get used to this era where the Democrat is a hawk on drones and surges in Afghanistan and killing Bin Laden and the Republicans are......what now?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Because it was a much better speech then the one Mittens gave. I'm sure the RNC was thinking, "let's have an old white guy talk to a chair. Then, nobody will pay any attention to Romney's speech."
If Obama spoke at the convention you would say he sucked. Such a homer.........
Sorry, can you clarify what you are trying to say? I don't understand your point.
A homer is someone who thinks their friends, family, team and/or anything else are the greatest when, in fact, that is far from the truth. But he/she will continually believe that no matter what..
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Because it was a much better speech then the one Mittens gave. I'm sure the RNC was thinking, "let's have an old white guy talk to a chair. Then, nobody will pay any attention to Romney's speech."
If Obama spoke at the convention you would say he sucked. Such a homer.........
Sorry, can you clarify what you are trying to say? I don't understand your point.
A homer is someone who thinks their friends, family, team and/or anything else are the greatest when, in fact, that is far from the truth. But he/she will continually believe that no matter what..
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Because it was a much better speech then the one Mittens gave. I'm sure the RNC was thinking, "let's have an old white guy talk to a chair. Then, nobody will pay any attention to Romney's speech."
If Obama spoke at the convention you would say he sucked. Such a homer.........
Sorry, can you clarify what you are trying to say? I don't understand your point.
Darlin', this is what Twitter was made for!Anonymous wrote:Will every major Romney event result in a hilarious hash tag or twitter feed? And it twitter prepared for this?
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Because it was a much better speech then the one Mittens gave. I'm sure the RNC was thinking, "let's have an old white guy talk to a chair. Then, nobody will pay any attention to Romney's speech."
If Obama spoke at the convention you would say he sucked. Such a homer.........
Anonymous wrote:jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Because it was a much better speech then the one Mittens gave. I'm sure the RNC was thinking, "let's have an old white guy talk to a chair. Then, nobody will pay any attention to Romney's speech."
If Obama spoke at the convention you would say he sucked. Such a homer.........
jsteele wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Because it was a much better speech then the one Mittens gave. I'm sure the RNC was thinking, "let's have an old white guy talk to a chair. Then, nobody will pay any attention to Romney's speech."
Anonymous wrote:Yet everyone is talking about it, hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm