Anonymous wrote:Does anyone else watch this? DD is really into it and I watch it with her on demand.
It is a documentary-style show about a real kindergarten class, filmed in 2000. You get to know the children in the classs throughout the series. This is before "No Child Left Behind" and it is really interesting to see the changes in kindergarten that have taken place since then.
Most of the children turn 5 during school year, not 6 or 7 as they would now. And while the kids do a bit of academic type stuff, like learning the alphabet, they mostly do crafts, work on little plays, learn about firemen, make valentines, get read to, eat snacks, socialize a lot, play, build blocks -- what kindergarten used to be. They are there for half a day, not 9 to 3.
It's really striking what kindergarten used to be, only ten years ago. And this is Upper Nyack, Long Island.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Omg stop stamping out your two year old's creative thoughts by forcing academic stuff on them you weirdos. Creative thinking is what leads to success, not learning to please adults by acting like a trained monkey. Help the child out by encouraging creativity and problem solving, not rote memorization. No one is impressed that your two year old is good at counting.
But we need worker bees to carry out the ideas and decisions of the outliers. You can't be a worker bee without trained monkey characteristics and skills. Sheesh!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HOly cow! My kid's kindergarten last year was writing (stories and poetry by the end), learning time and money (and adding coins, etc), intense reading instruction, science lab, etc. K is this area has definitely changed. I think this is why kids are turning 6...this is pretty intense for a 4-year old (anyone with a Sept bday in VA). I don't think a single kid in any of the 5 classes turned 7 (it would have been a kid that had a May/June bday) this just is not done in our public school system. Maybe it is more common and encouraged by privates.
My son's Kindergarten was pretty intense too. I loved it and I approve. My son soaked it all in and is going into first grade a strong and eager reader.
He has loved learning and i've been astonished at how much he was able to absorb last year.
If you think public school is intense, you haven't seen ANYTHING. I looked into sending my son to a very very academically strict private school. He would have been one of a handful of white kids, as all of the seats were filled with Asian and Indian children. The stuff that that those kids were doing was insane. All of the pre-K kids could read. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. They could all do basic math. By the end of K, they were working on their multiplication tables.
At the end of the day, I simply was "too American" to send my child to that school. The kids were drilled and for sure the school was pumping kids into Thomas Jefferson, but at the end of the day, I did want my son to be able to have a little more down time.
Anonymous wrote:Haven't seen the show, but here's something interesting-
We discovered, when living in Switzerland, that children don't start elementary school until age 6.5/7 (you must be 6 years old by May 1st in order to start in the fall).
For ages 3/4 - 6/7, there is "Kindergarten". Kindergarten is smaller & more local (not physically located in the elementary school), and is ALL PLAY and socialization. It's also not typically full-day. No letters or numbers - nada.
By around 4th grade or so, kids have caught up academically to their American counterparts (and start to surpass them).
Anonymous wrote:We chose private school to avoid the insanity of a pressured academic kindergarten.
Anonymous wrote:I know it sets a bad precedent but the poor kid got home at four and his bedtime was 7. I only had three hours to feed him, bathe him, and play with him. On days when we attempted homework it would take an hour because I was constantly after him to put his answers to paper.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There will be a backlash against this. I only wish it would have already happened. My child will probably enter kindergarten knowing how to read. But the system where a barely 5 (late Aug birthday) year old will be sat in a seat and made to stay still all year, well, we'll probably redshirt our little dude so that he has time to BE A CHILD.
Enough is enough. I like kindergarten the way it was in 2000.
And then when the little dude can't sit still for hours then you have the talk with the teacher where she recommends your kid get put on ritalin for ADD. Beautiful.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:HOly cow! My kid's kindergarten last year was writing (stories and poetry by the end), learning time and money (and adding coins, etc), intense reading instruction, science lab, etc. K is this area has definitely changed. I think this is why kids are turning 6...this is pretty intense for a 4-year old (anyone with a Sept bday in VA). I don't think a single kid in any of the 5 classes turned 7 (it would have been a kid that had a May/June bday) this just is not done in our public school system. Maybe it is more common and encouraged by privates.
My son's Kindergarten was pretty intense too. I loved it and I approve. My son soaked it all in and is going into first grade a strong and eager reader.
He has loved learning and i've been astonished at how much he was able to absorb last year.
If you think public school is intense, you haven't seen ANYTHING. I looked into sending my son to a very very academically strict private school. He would have been one of a handful of white kids, as all of the seats were filled with Asian and Indian children. The stuff that that those kids were doing was insane. All of the pre-K kids could read. EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM. They could all do basic math. By the end of K, they were working on their multiplication tables.
At the end of the day, I simply was "too American" to send my child to that school. The kids were drilled and for sure the school was pumping kids into Thomas Jefferson, but at the end of the day, I did want my son to be able to have a little more down time.