Anonymous wrote:
I can speak only for one of the latter but it seems to me that this thing about leaving after 4th grade is a Brent phenomenon. We're perfectly happy with what our non-Brent school from the rest of that list has to offer in the upper grade and aren't willing to compromise that just because some "harpers" (I like that term) have to feel better about their angst by causing others to be anxious.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: I can speak only for one of the latter but it seems to me that this thing about leaving after 4th grade is a Brent phenomenon. We're perfectly happy with what our non-Brent school from the rest of that list has to offer in the upper grade and aren't willing to compromise that just because some "harpers" (I like that term) have to feel better about their angst by causing others to be anxious. If you can't see how your own child is benefiting from a good school regardless (or maybe because) of the socioeconomic makeup of the school as a whole, then either Brent isn't so great or you're just never going to be happy in the city's schools. Why bother trekking to Basis or Latin, where the same angst will inevitably catch up with you?
Call me a harper in a growing chorus. My kid was bored at another Hill school, so we switched to Brent, where I'm happy to find that she's no longer is. Kids are different - some are on the bell curve and don't need extra challenge, some, like mine, are probably off it, or standing in the nether regions. But we're all DC tax payers and we all deserve challenge for our children and good schools.
The pps who point out that the socioeconomic make-up of a particular Hill school would be less of an issue if real challenge were consistently provided to all students are on the right track. It's DCPS that motivates parents to group around Brent, and other mostly white enclaves.
You make a good point about trekking to Latin, where there is almost no ability grouping/tracking to be had although some kids come in below Basic. We'll have to see about Basis. But parents who want more for their tax dollars and kids don't have to say "never," take no for an answer, go private or move. They're free to remind politicians who pays the bills. The more who do this, the more likely that challenge for all will follow. We've talked to Tommy Wells' office and dearly wish that more inspired harpers would do the same.
Anonymous wrote:I'll buy that argument when Brent retains a significant number of rising 4th graders rather than watching an exodus to Latin/Basis/other for 5th, just like all Hill residing families with kids at Maury, Watkins, and Tyler SI.
Anonymous wrote:Strut your stuff, Brent families. Brag on or bring it on, Brent families. Let's see the goal is to get a middle-school to keep white families here after 3rd grade. Hmmm, nothing beats a failure but a try. It worked with the Banneker and the SWW experiment. So, keep at it, don't give up Brent families, I am counting on you to do this as an AA family, I am so vested to this idea. Go head white families lay down the foundation and I as an AA family will just enter on the premise; that if you try to keep me out, I will scream racism. See, the harder you try to change, it will all remain the same in some form or fashion.
Anonymous wrote:Where is this chest-thumping by Brent folks that you speak of? I'm a happy Brent parent, but I wouldn't say it is the best school on Capitol Hill-- and I have never heard another Brent parent say that it is. As you say-- parents have different preferences, so it is impossible to say which school is "best". So having "You're #1!" doesn't make anyone feel better at Brent since it is both untrue (no school is really "#1") and misspelled.
But a guarantee of a great middle school within a half-mile would be lovely and make us Brent folks feel much better!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Parents invest in different schools based on different preferences, which is one reason why some of the Brent community insecurity and chest thumping is so humorous. "YOU'RE #1!" There . . . feel better?
Where is this chest-thumping by Brent folks that you speak of? I'm a happy Brent parent, but I wouldn't say it is the best school on Capitol Hill-- and I have never heard another Brent parent say that it is. As you say-- parents have different preferences, so it is impossible to say which school is "best". So having "You're #1!" doesn't make anyone feel better at Brent since it is both untrue (no school is really "#1") and misspelled.
But a guarantee of a great middle school within a half-mile would be lovely and make us Brent folks feel much better!
Anonymous wrote:
Be real for one family that leaves, you best to believe there's one waiting to enter and then with that percentage there's those who stay for the long haul.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:DC doesn't have as large a population as NYC and the fact of the matter is, "testing-in" will have the end result of segregation by race and socio-economic status: well off mostly whites in "gifted" and poor AA in regular classes. Everyone knows this. So keep harping about it and save up for private.
Haven't posted here before but don't see pps clamoring for "testing-in" as "harping;" they're just a little ahead of their time...
DCPS must move in the direction of such programs eventually to keep affluent voters/taxpayers in the system, explaining why the issue keeps coming up. Rhee & Bloomberg held a joint public meeting in town in early 2010 where audience members asked when DCPS will set up g&t programs like new york's. Rhee didn't duck the issue like Henderson does.
With DCPS seeking to avoid segregation by sticking with differentiated learning w/in the classroom, although the highest-performing urban school districts in the country (like chicago) rejected the model long ago, they get it on a much grander scale than they would by screening poor kids for giftedness young & providing them with a push to keep up with high SES peers.
DC can only duck the testing-in issue for so much longer, as affluent voters gain politcal capital by becoming a bigger slice of the demographic pie. Please, the size of our population isn't what's keeping the city back on test-in middle schools. Everybody knows this.
Brent's changing demographics are generating resentment & jealousy on the Hill from those who can't afford to buy in the Brent district. The development leads more and more parents to wonder why it's ok to have mostly whites in a neighborhood school, just not in a g&t program that would benefit more poor AA kids than Brent will have soon...
Anonymous wrote:
Brent's changing demographics are generating resentment & jealousy on the Hill from those who can't afford to buy in the Brent district. The development leads more and more parents to wonder why it's ok to have mostly whites in a neighborhood school, just not in a g&t program that would benefit more poor AA kids than Brent will have soon...
Anonymous wrote:DC doesn't have as large a population as NYC and the fact of the matter is, "testing-in" will have the end result of segregation by race and socio-economic status: well off mostly whites in "gifted" and poor AA in regular classes. Everyone knows this. So keep harping about it and save up for private.
Anonymous wrote:DC doesn't have as large a population as NYC and the fact of the matter is, "testing-in" will have the end result of segregation by race and socio-economic status: well off mostly whites in "gifted" and poor AA in regular classes. Everyone knows this. So keep harping about it and save up for private.