The PYP (K-5th) and MYP (6th-10th) are independent of the IB Diploma Programme, which is only 11th and 12th grades. The MYP can't really be effective unless it is a full, school-wide initiative with all of the courses following the model. Otherwise, it is just too spotty to be effective.
Anonymous wrote:The point with IB is, the teachers must EMBED the UN philosophy of world government, AGenda 21, and MDG, as well as the UDHR as the overarching authority into their lessons. It's nothing more than making the kids political mules for UNESCO.
STEER CLEAR!
- teacher, 35 years
Anonymous wrote:I have a kid going to Deal next year and it does not seem to have penetrated too deeply there much to my relief. The High School program is pretty intense, more because the scope of the exams and writing requirements. I just don't see how the PYP and MYP actually prepare you for the high school program.
Anonymous wrote:My child left College Gardens for another non-PYP MoCo school. The curriculum was the same with different names...except there was no language and no PYP characteristics/reflections. I would not say PYP was any better or worse...just the same.
Anonymous wrote:And there you have it. As with all curriculum framework and approaches, there are pros and cons, supporters and detractors. Now quit using this as a forum to bash individual schools, and if you're lucky enough to have a choice in schools, pick the one with the curriculum that appeals to you. Good god. What a bunch of meanies on DCUM!!!
Anonymous wrote:And there you have it. As with all curriculum framework and approaches, there are pros and cons, supporters and detractors. Now quit using this as a forum to bash individual schools, and if you're lucky enough to have a choice in schools, pick the one with the curriculum that appeals to you. Good god. What a bunch of meanies on DCUM!!!