Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, asians are the best students, but do not know how to write essays
This seems like an oxymoron: how can you be the "best" student if you have no writing ability? It's an important skill and colleges rightly look for it.
Since it's all rigged to keep the ruling class in their positions, meritocracy requires random IQ tests when they are very young, before they can be test prepped. You either are truly gifted or not.
The Cult of Smartness: How Meritocracy Is Failing America
Institutions designed to reward merit are being gamed by the privileged, who create a self-perpetuating elite. The most familiar example concerns admission to prestigious schools. Admissions tests like the SAT began as a high-minded reform. Applicants would be chosen for intellectual prowess and compete for their spot on a level playing field. Thanks to test prep, the rich get lots of time to practice on it, while even smart poor kids don't.
More broadly, inequality begets more inequality. "Those who climb up the ladder will always find a way to pull it up after them, or to selectively lower it down to allow their friends, allies and kin to scramble up." Thus the astonishingly outsized gains seen at the very top of American society.
http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/06/why-our-elites-are-failing-us-and-how-to-fix-it/258492/
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Ok, asians are the best students, but do not know how to write essays
This seems like an oxymoron: how can you be the "best" student if you have no writing ability? It's an important skill and colleges rightly look for it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Asian parents just need to quit salivating over Harvard. When I lived near there I'd see huge busloads of Asian tourists coming through campus. Maybe the problem is not the preportionately fewer Asians that are admitted; maybe it's the proportionally much higher numbers of Asians who apply because their parents are obsessed with the place. There are so many fantastic colleges in this country. We don't all have to line up at one of them.
It's not just Harvard. All of the Ivies use race-based admission policies that are based on government mandated AA regulations. The point of the case going to the Supremes is to overturn the federal AA regulations that mandate quotas. They were originally intended to be more protective of minorities, but they don't really do that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is racist, don't add race to applications, problem solved
I think names like Jung Koo or Ravi Patel will give it away anyway.
I agree. But I don't know what the solution is.
Blind admissions using numbers. No identifiable info beyond scores. Maybe the top schools would have 98% asians and 2% whites that way.
Anonymous wrote:Asian parents just need to quit salivating over Harvard. When I lived near there I'd see huge busloads of Asian tourists coming through campus. Maybe the problem is not the preportionately fewer Asians that are admitted; maybe it's the proportionally much higher numbers of Asians who apply because their parents are obsessed with the place. There are so many fantastic colleges in this country. We don't all have to line up at one of them.
Anonymous wrote:Ok, asians are the best students, but do not know how to write essays
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"If all other credentials are equal, Asian-Americans need to score 140 points more than whites, 270 points higher than Hispanics, and 450 points above African-Americans out of a maximum 1600 on the math and reading SAT to have the same chance of admission to a private college, according to “No Longer Separate, Not Yet Equal,” a 2009 book co-written by Princeton sociologist Thomas Espenshade."
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-02-02/harvard-targeted-in-u-s-asian-american-discrimination-probe.html
That's because they don't just go by test scores when making admissions decisions. As it should be,
PP, how did you do on reading comprehension tests? I'm asking b/c you failed to note the words "If all other credentials are equal . . . ."Yes, factors other than test scores are taken into account, but AA candidates are still held to a higher standard. ...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is racist, don't add race to applications, problem solved
I think names like Jung Koo or Ravi Patel will give it away anyway.
I agree. But I don't know what the solution is.
Blind admissions using numbers. No identifiable info beyond scores. Maybe the top schools would have 98% asians and 2% whites that way.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is racist, don't add race to applications, problem solved
I think names like Jung Koo or Ravi Patel will give it away anyway.
I agree. But I don't know what the solution is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:this is racist, don't add race to applications, problem solved
I think names like Jung Koo or Ravi Patel will give it away anyway.
Anonymous wrote:this is racist, don't add race to applications, problem solved