Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes the wedding less of an event and shorter, because people aren't going to stay from 6:30 until midnight without eating dinner.
Why? You eat beforehand, not after.
I'm not hungry for dinner at 4:30. You have to get your hair, makeup, etc. done and travel to the church, so it's not like you can start eating at 5:30 and be at the ceremony at 6:30.
why can't you eat dinner with your hair and makeup done? Do them at 4 and eat at 5. It's not rocket science.
Anonymous wrote:I wouldn't call it midwestern - more like cheap. Count on a cash bar, if any.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes the wedding less of an event and shorter, because people aren't going to stay from 6:30 until midnight without eating dinner.
Why? You eat beforehand, not after.
I'm not hungry for dinner at 4:30. You have to get your hair, makeup, etc. done and travel to the church, so it's not like you can start eating at 5:30 and be at the ceremony at 6:30.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is wrong with the timing? It is normal to eat dinner at 5 or 5:30 in the midwest. I live in the midwest and my dinner parties all start at 4:30 or 5. It's nice and everyone else does the same.
How is that possible? Don't people in the midwest work an 8 hour day, plus time for lunch and a commute, even if it is a short one?
They get to leave early because they are All. Just. So. Nice!
Unlike us dickweeds on the coasts.
I love the term "dickweed!" Haven't heard it for years.
Anyway, late dinners do tend to be the norm on the east and west coasts, and early dinners are more common in the midwest, especially rural areas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It makes the wedding less of an event and shorter, because people aren't going to stay from 6:30 until midnight without eating dinner.
Why? You eat beforehand, not after.
Anonymous wrote:It makes the wedding less of an event and shorter, because people aren't going to stay from 6:30 until midnight without eating dinner.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, in my small-town part of the Midwest, everyone is strapped for cash, so this is the norm. Usually the weddings are afternoon affairs so everyone can go home/to a restaurant to eat dinner in between. The timing on this one is indeed unfortunate. But in my part of the Midwest, people would comment that it was unfortunate timing, but not get up-in-arms that it is cheap and tacky. Because it is a wedding and a happy affair, and there is nothing wrong with "cheap."
+1
You people sound like such snobs. Not everyone has the money to serve a full dinner at their wedding. And 6:30 on a Saturday isn't all that early. It's not like people are coming straight from work.
We eat at 6:30 pm 7 days a week. It IS dinner hour.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well, in my small-town part of the Midwest, everyone is strapped for cash, so this is the norm. Usually the weddings are afternoon affairs so everyone can go home/to a restaurant to eat dinner in between. The timing on this one is indeed unfortunate. But in my part of the Midwest, people would comment that it was unfortunate timing, but not get up-in-arms that it is cheap and tacky. Because it is a wedding and a happy affair, and there is nothing wrong with "cheap."
+1
You people sound like such snobs. Not everyone has the money to serve a full dinner at their wedding. And 6:30 on a Saturday isn't all that early. It's not like people are coming straight from work.
We eat at 6:30 pm 7 days a week. It IS dinner hour.