Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1.
We moved from an eastern school to a western school. in the eastern school (which was wonderful by the way), the kids were grouped by ability. All the high achieving kids were pulled out for math AND reading and their teachers were fully trained and used the William and Mary curriculum. This approach worked and the school's test scores went up, presumably because every child got more attention at their level.
In our western school, there was no such grouping, except for Math so dc would end up with a reading group of two. Granted there was more uniformity amongst the kids in the western school but I believe the eastern school's approach was better.
I know this isn't true of all schools in the eastern side but I agree with the previous poster - whether you live on the east side or west side, all our kids would benefit from grouping and it does not require extra resources (except teacher training). They are doing it in Math - why not in other subjects. Let's stand together.
This Exactly! I agree and have been saying this for the last 4 years. We live in western MC, and I've been very frustrated at the lack of grouping in language arts and lack of implementation of the W&M curriculum. I also get so frustrated that so many people think that every school in this county operates in the same way because it is all MCPS. Since you have lived in both eastern & western MC and have had you attend two different elementary schools you clearly can attest to the fact that there are significant differences in the way the schools implement the curriculum. I agree that the eastern school you attended had a much better approach!
I'm the pp you quote. I could not agree more. I think the main problem in MCPS isn't just the green zone/red zone divide but the fact that there is no uniformity in the approach. If you are lucky to get a driven principal (which we had in our eastern school) who is determined to provide the best resources for every student, your child can get a good education in MCPS regardless of their ability. Too much depends on the principal you end up with which is largely a matter of luck. If parents knew that they could expect ability grouping (and differentiated/appropriate curriculum) in ALL schools in MCPS perhaps these resentments that seem to surface on the listserve would diminish.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1.
We moved from an eastern school to a western school. in the eastern school (which was wonderful by the way), the kids were grouped by ability. All the high achieving kids were pulled out for math AND reading and their teachers were fully trained and used the William and Mary curriculum. This approach worked and the school's test scores went up, presumably because every child got more attention at their level.
In our western school, there was no such grouping, except for Math so dc would end up with a reading group of two. Granted there was more uniformity amongst the kids in the western school but I believe the eastern school's approach was better.
I know this isn't true of all schools in the eastern side but I agree with the previous poster - whether you live on the east side or west side, all our kids would benefit from grouping and it does not require extra resources (except teacher training). They are doing it in Math - why not in other subjects. Let's stand together.
This Exactly! I agree and have been saying this for the last 4 years. We live in western MC, and I've been very frustrated at the lack of grouping in language arts and lack of implementation of the W&M curriculum. I also get so frustrated that so many people think that every school in this county operates in the same way because it is all MCPS. Since you have lived in both eastern & western MC and have had you attend two different elementary schools you clearly can attest to the fact that there are significant differences in the way the schools implement the curriculum. I agree that the eastern school you attended had a much better approach!
Anonymous wrote:+1.
We moved from an eastern school to a western school. in the eastern school (which was wonderful by the way), the kids were grouped by ability. All the high achieving kids were pulled out for math AND reading and their teachers were fully trained and used the William and Mary curriculum. This approach worked and the school's test scores went up, presumably because every child got more attention at their level.
In our western school, there was no such grouping, except for Math so dc would end up with a reading group of two. Granted there was more uniformity amongst the kids in the western school but I believe the eastern school's approach was better.
I know this isn't true of all schools in the eastern side but I agree with the previous poster - whether you live on the east side or west side, all our kids would benefit from grouping and it does not require extra resources (except teacher training). They are doing it in Math - why not in other subjects. Let's stand together.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here are some facts
1. the GTA got about 104 comments for the Super's forum. Some comments were multiple comments from the same person, some were from people who weren't in our system! Even if all those commenters were counted it is still barely the number of parents of an incoming magnet class.
2. take out the comments that supported magnets and centers and you don't even have enough to claim anything.
this was truly a dumb idea.
This posts seems delusional. The reality is volunteering and advocating will never get 100% attendance. Our local elemenatry school probably has about 400-500 kids. Only 10/15 parents are the ones who are regulars in PTA meetings and they do a tremendous job representing all parents in all events. It drains them for sure, but the school cannot expect 100% parents participation in arranging the events etc. Same with the school my kids attend for magnet programs. Only a handful of magnet parents run all the events.
It is not a question of quantity but quality. Did you read the comments. If people waited to advocate an idea until it is popular, this country would still have slaves.
BTW magnet and center kids are also identified as GT (their subset is called HG). So, if they did not end up in magnet program, they will suffer a great deal in local schools. Even in middle school magnet program, the non-magnet classes need to have ability grouping. Don't even get me started with all the stress parents and kids go through for magnet testing before they are accepted due to the terrifying fear of the kind of education they will get in local school.
The OP is right. GTA couldn't get support form even a small fraction of parents. PP--not even one percent of those labeled have commented. 104 comments? You lost--just admit it that parents are fed up with the divisive ways of the new GTA administration. When did you guys get elected? What have you done with the money? Just stop attacking parents and get your leaders to stop emailing everyone in MCPS and the county council at the drop of a hat.
I do not really give a damn about the GTA, what you think about the GTA or whether you care about opportunities for your children to get a challenging education in MCPS. There are parents who do care their children get appropriate and challenging instruction in school (MCPS). Many of us have no where to turn for help. Some of us do not give a damn about your infatuation with "gifted" labels. We do give a damn if a 5-year-old child with mastery of addition, subtraction, division and multiplication is sitting in a MCPS classroom with 25 others simply counting up to 100 all day long for 2-3 years. When situations like this occur all over the MCPS landscape no amount of child education and development theory, power point presentations, smoke screens, secrecy, nontransparency, clandestine policies can cover up what is a simple farce masquerading as mathematics education (for this 5-year-old in question). Many parents find it hard to believe MCPS cannot find a mechanism to reach this particular 5-year-old at their math level. Are MCPS elementary math teachers in K-5 incompetent? Or are they forced to follow the lead of an incompetent Principal who may be following the lead of incompetent MCPS leadership? Each conspirator fearing backlash from above if they fail to tow the party line? Many parents are leery of speaking up and speaking their minds because the maturity level of those in MCPS schools assures a backlash against their children and many want to spare their children the psychological trauma of system vindictiveness. Parents simply put down their arms and take matters into their own hands ... or the hands of "outside tutors"...resigned to public school (MCPS) as a vehicle for developing friendships (MCPS teachers serving as 6 hour/day baby sitters) with the most important education (academic and intellectual challenge) occurring outside of the MCPS classroom (e.g., online and offline education). For many in MCPS the real education of their children occurs on the weekends (and evenings) ... ironically in many of the MCPS brick and mortar school buildings! MCPS is slowly transforming itself into a $2 billion/year massive after care social service with the teachers relegated to baby sitters...the Principal, the head baby sitter.
The OP is right. GTA couldn't get support form even a small fraction of parents. PP--not even one percent of those labeled have commented. 104 comments? You lost--just admit it that parents are fed up with the divisive ways of the new GTA administration. When did you guys get elected? What have you done with the money? Just stop attacking parents and get your leaders to stop emailing everyone in MCPS and the county council at the drop of a hat.
Anonymous wrote:Whatever 7:34 - you obviously have an axe to grind.
I didn't see a petition by the "other side" and I think the comments submitted were quite thoughtful. 100 isn't a lot out of the entire county, but frankly I hadn't even heard about the forum until a couple weeks ago (thanks to this board).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever 7:34 - you obviously have an axe to grind.
I didn't see a petition by the "other side" and I think the comments submitted were quite thoughtful. 100 isn't a lot out of the entire county, but frankly I hadn't even heard about the forum until a couple weeks ago (thanks to this board).
I heard from a magnet teacher(a very smart one) in my DC's middle school that the magnet teachers found out about the GT forum only 2 days ago when the coordinator sent a notice. That is how it has been advertised. Not every teacher/parent is active in pulling information. It is unfortunate but it is true.
Anonymous wrote:Whatever 7:34 - you obviously have an axe to grind.
I didn't see a petition by the "other side" and I think the comments submitted were quite thoughtful. 100 isn't a lot out of the entire county, but frankly I hadn't even heard about the forum until a couple weeks ago (thanks to this board).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Here are some facts
1. the GTA got about 104 comments for the Super's forum. Some comments were multiple comments from the same person, some were from people who weren't in our system! Even if all those commenters were counted it is still barely the number of parents of an incoming magnet class.
2. take out the comments that supported magnets and centers and you don't even have enough to claim anything.
this was truly a dumb idea.
This posts seems delusional. The reality is volunteering and advocating will never get 100% attendance. Our local elemenatry school probably has about 400-500 kids. Only 10/15 parents are the ones who are regulars in PTA meetings and they do a tremendous job representing all parents in all events. It drains them for sure, but the school cannot expect 100% parents participation in arranging the events etc. Same with the school my kids attend for magnet programs. Only a handful of magnet parents run all the events.
It is not a question of quantity but quality. Did you read the comments. If people waited to advocate an idea until it is popular, this country would still have slaves.
BTW magnet and center kids are also identified as GT (their subset is called HG). So, if they did not end up in magnet program, they will suffer a great deal in local schools. Even in middle school magnet program, the non-magnet classes need to have ability grouping. Don't even get me started with all the stress parents and kids go through for magnet testing before they are accepted due to the terrifying fear of the kind of education they will get in local school.
Anonymous wrote:
Here are some facts
1. the GTA got about 104 comments for the Super's forum. Some comments were multiple comments from the same person, some were from people who weren't in our system! Even if all those commenters were counted it is still barely the number of parents of an incoming magnet class.
2. take out the comments that supported magnets and centers and you don't even have enough to claim anything.
this was truly a dumb idea.