I'm not sick of her, but is C9BL still around? I haven't seen any posts from her lately.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.

I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.

'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.

But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?

NO, it's not, because if you "uncontract" the contraction "there's" it is "there is." And "there is been a ton" is not correct, as you, me, and everyone else can recognize.

Isn't the contraction "there has," not "there is?" Now I am really starting to second-guess my grammatical smarts!

It's "there've" - contractions contract the words they replace.

Anonymous wrote:The "it's DC Urban Moms and Dads" poster who asks every childless person who posts what they are doing reading this part of the Internet before they have procreated.

Yes, especially in this forum, called "Off Topic" that pretty much has NOTHING to do with parenting.

The "it's DC Urban Moms and Dads" poster who asks every childless person who posts what they are doing reading this part of the Internet before they have procreated.

You're correct; 19:48 -- 19:45 is incorrect

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.

I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.

'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.

But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?

NO, it's not, because if you "uncontract" the contraction "there's" it is "there is." And "there is been a ton" is not correct, as you, me, and everyone else can recognize.

Isn't the contraction "there has," not "there is?" Now I am really starting to second-guess my grammatical smarts!

s/o posters of bad/dumb topics

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.

I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.

'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.

But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?

NO, it's not, because if you "uncontract" the contraction "there's" it is "there is." And "there is been a ton" is not correct, as you, me, and everyone else can recognize.

The "DCUMMIE" poster. Not nearly as clever as she thinks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:PS. There HAVE BEEN tons of threads....(although that's a dubious grammatical construct at best)

not "there's been". ugh.

I'm 18:04; we you correcting me? I said 'there's been a ton of threads,' and I think that's grammatically correct.

'There has been tons' is incorrect. 'There have been tons' is correct.

But i said, "there's been a ton" -- isn't that correct?

Anonymous wrote:The crazy anti-vax conspiracy theory woman.

+100

Posters who just cannot let a grammatical error go, even when 5 posters have already pointed it out.

I'll play. The poster who thinks "libtard" is a clever insult. It makes her sound like a preschooler who thinks she invented a dirty word.

The trolls who don't think they are trolls.

I'm sick of posters who, like OP, apparently can't use grammar properly. Not only does she not know how to use a contraction, but she also ended her post title with a preposition.

Really, posters who make mistakes like these bug me most of all.