Anonymous wrote:Let's assume, for argument's sake, that OP was accurate and correct in what she described - that is, a dad, alone at the game with his girls ages 3 and 5, left them in their seats for 10-12 minutes to get popcorn. Let's assume (again, for argument's sake), that he went only for popcorn and did not go to the bathroom, that he did not ask a spectator sitting nearby to watch his kids for him.
Do we all agree that this scenario, as presented, represents negligence on the part of the dad?
Anonymous wrote:Let's assume, for argument's sake, that OP was accurate and correct in what she described - that is, a dad, alone at the game with his girls ages 3 and 5, left them in their seats for 10-12 minutes to get popcorn. Let's assume (again, for argument's sake), that he went only for popcorn and did not go to the bathroom, that he did not ask a spectator sitting nearby to watch his kids for him.
Do we all agree that this scenario, as presented, represents negligence on the part of the dad?
Do we all agree that this scenario, as presented, represents negligence on the part of the dad?
Anonymous wrote:You guys actually think there was another adult watching the kids, yet not interacting with them? Give me a break.
Anonymous wrote:If I were the mom and I found out my dh left our 3 and 5 year olds in their seats by themselves for even a minute while he went to get food, I'd cut off his balls. In what universe could any of you nitwits think that this was a good decision? There are too many plausible scenarios (3 yr old gets worried and tries to leave; 5 year old can't stop her; 3 year old runs away looking for him, for e.g) that could get pretty scary pretty quickly.
Anonymous wrote:If I were the mom and I found out my dh left our 3 and 5 year olds in their seats by themselves for even a minute while he went to get food, I'd cut off his balls. In what universe could any of you nitwits think that this was a good decision? There are too many plausible scenarios (3 yr old gets worried and tries to leave; 5 year old can't stop her; 3 year old runs away looking for him, for e.g) that could get pretty scary pretty quickly.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Perhaps they were dwarfs and actually 10 and 12?
And the man was actually a manny.
As long as we are making assumptions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's what we know about OP:
1. He or she says that he or she went to a hockey game yesterday.
2. He or she says that he or she saw a dad leave two girls, age 3 and 5, alone there for 12 minutes.
3. He or she posted about it on DCUM.
4. Assuming that OP is posting in good faith, we also know that s/he thought that maybe the mom would see the post.
A. From 3 and 4, we can deduce that OP is not very smart.
B. Because OP is not very smart, we cannot trust his/her judgment about the ages of the girls, nor the time that the dad was gone.
C. It's possible that the dad got up to get popcorn for his 6 and 8 year olds from a vendor in the stadium, and could still see his kids, but then could not return to his seat for 3 or 4 minutes because they don't let you do that while the game is in progress. Dumb, outraged OP couldn't tell the difference because s/he's dumb and because his/her judgment was clouded by pointless rage.
This post is ridiculous and senseless.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Here's what we know about OP:
1. He or she says that he or she went to a hockey game yesterday.
2. He or she says that he or she saw a dad leave two girls, age 3 and 5, alone there for 12 minutes.
3. He or she posted about it on DCUM.
4. Assuming that OP is posting in good faith, we also know that s/he thought that maybe the mom would see the post.
A. From 3 and 4, we can deduce that OP is not very smart.
B. Because OP is not very smart, we cannot trust his/her judgment about the ages of the girls, nor the time that the dad was gone.
C. It's possible that the dad got up to get popcorn for his 6 and 8 year olds from a vendor in the stadium, and could still see his kids, but then could not return to his seat for 3 or 4 minutes because they don't let you do that while the game is in progress. Dumb, outraged OP couldn't tell the difference because s/he's dumb and because his/her judgment was clouded by pointless rage.
This post is ridiculous and senseless.
Anonymous wrote:Here's what we know about OP:
1. He or she says that he or she went to a hockey game yesterday.
2. He or she says that he or she saw a dad leave two girls, age 3 and 5, alone there for 12 minutes.
3. He or she posted about it on DCUM.
4. Assuming that OP is posting in good faith, we also know that s/he thought that maybe the mom would see the post.
A. From 3 and 4, we can deduce that OP is not very smart.
B. Because OP is not very smart, we cannot trust his/her judgment about the ages of the girls, nor the time that the dad was gone.
C. It's possible that the dad got up to get popcorn for his 6 and 8 year olds from a vendor in the stadium, and could still see his kids, but then could not return to his seat for 3 or 4 minutes because they don't let you do that while the game is in progress. Dumb, outraged OP couldn't tell the difference because s/he's dumb and because his/her judgment was clouded by pointless rage.