Anonymous wrote:
The anger that you often see on this board is that after paying $30,000 + for our own DCs to get an education we are then asked to pay more for your children.
Unless your child scored none wrong on the ERB, pipe down. Your school is only giving FA to bright kids and is only doing it so that their test scores will make the rest of the school look good. No one is being "given" any thing. It is the brain power of these bright kids that earns your school its reputation, maintains its reputation and, later largely establishes the intellectual environment in which your child will be educated. My DC gets a lot of aid and spends most of his class time graciously helping his classmates who " don't understand".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is fa artificially raises the cost of tuition thus pushing out middle class families. I think that is the anger and I understand that.
Do you think the extra $2500 you pay towards FA is the difference between affordable and not affordable? Wake up call, that is highly unlikely. When parents file for FA there is a formula used to calculate what, if any FA a family should receive. The schools usually reserve middle class pots for teachers and staff children who usually receive *gasp* FINANCIAL AID!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
I doubt that you have the same story. You don't know what the story is for people who apply for financial aid. In addition, just be happy that you are not poor.
+ 1 I couldn't agree more.
Anonymous wrote:The anger that you often see on this board is that after paying $30,000 + for our own DCs to get an education we are then asked to pay more for your children.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of the resentment comes from people who are in between "have" and "have not." That is, people who make healthy incomes but also have high expenses and private school is still a financial strain, even if they have the means. The very rich can write a check for $30k with no problem. The very poor get a hand out. So, like Romney, the very middle class (!) don't care about either group.
Maybe I misunderstood and this is your point, but the ire shouldn't come from "people who are in between "have" and "have not." That is, people who make healthy incomes but also have high expenses and private school is still a financial strain, even if they have the means" - it should be directed at those people. To me, you've exactly described the $250k HHI family who has the expensive house and lives pretty high on the hog, but still applies for and feels entitled to financial aid because their expenses are so high. But those expenses are choices, and why should others chip in for them because they absolutely HAVE to live in a $850K house? I would much, much rather financial aid go to kids whose parents have a HHI of $100k.
We make about $250k HHI, and have positioned ourselves so that we could pay tuition out of pocket. That involves planning ahead, purchasing a much less expensive house that we "could have," and generally prioritizing education above a lot of things. So it really irks me when people blather on about "you can't get a house for under $750k" and how they simply couldn't pay tuition on their salaries. I get that you didn't plan ahead, and I get that your current expenses make it difficult to impossible to afford the full tuition. But those ARE choices, and I don't think your lack of foresight, or prioritizing things other than education, entltle you to FA, especially when it's subsidized by families like mine, who make the same HHI but made choices that allowed us to afford the school. The daughter of the bricklayer? By all means, she should get FA.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The problem is fa artificially raises the cost of tuition thus pushing out middle class families. I think that is the anger and I understand that.
Do you think the extra $2500 you pay towards FA is the difference between affordable and not affordable? Wake up call, that is highly unlikely. When parents file for FA there is a formula used to calculate what, if any FA a family should receive. The schools usually reserve middle class pots for teachers and staff children who usually receive *gasp* FINANCIAL AID!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
it is a myth
Bullshit. I am proof of that, and if you went to law school you are proof of that. I know many first generation college grads who busted their buts to move up the socio-economic ladder. A lack of generational wealth does not equate to a lack of opportunity.
It's not a myth. Do some reading. Yes, I went to law school, but my brother dropped out in the 9th grade and my sister did not go to college. I am 1 out of 3 kids who made it.
Three out of four kids in my family made it, by shear will and determination. Those who chose another path have no one to blame but themselves. We have the opportunity to succeed, no one can make us avail ourselves of that opportunity.
So? Just say no.Anonymous wrote:The anger that you often see on this board is that after paying $30,000 + for our own DCs to get an education we are then asked to pay more for your children.
Anonymous wrote:
it is a myth
Bullshit. I am proof of that, and if you went to law school you are proof of that. I know many first generation college grads who busted their buts to move up the socio-economic ladder. A lack of generational wealth does not equate to a lack of opportunity.
It's not a myth. Do some reading. Yes, I went to law school, but my brother dropped out in the 9th grade and my sister did not go to college. I am 1 out of 3 kids who made it.
Anonymous wrote:The problem is fa artificially raises the cost of tuition thus pushing out middle class families. I think that is the anger and I understand that.
Anonymous wrote:I think a lot of the resentment comes from people who are in between "have" and "have not." That is, people who make healthy incomes but also have high expenses and private school is still a financial strain, even if they have the means. The very rich can write a check for $30k with no problem. The very poor get a hand out. So, like Romney, the very middle class (!) don't care about either group.