Anonymous wrote:Wow. I guess I fall short of family cloth, but it does not seem outrageous to me. I get points for all the other things, except home births, and so do all of my friends.
Where the heck to you people scoring 2s and 3s live anyway?
Anonymous wrote:0. I don't do ANY of those things.
We don't use family cloth yet! When we get there we will have truly arrived, lol.Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Scale of 1-10 graded on
Breastfeeding-yes
Baby wearing -hell no
Cloth diapering-tried it for 2 months; too much work
Organic food-don't care; not convinced it's worth it
Vegan/vegetarian/other dietary choices based on environmental impact-Nope
Recycling-Don't care and don't have the time to pretend to care
Natural cleaning products-Nope
Avoidance of plastic and/or battery-operated toys-Nope
Co-sleeping-Not really, but did when babies were young (out of laziness)
Car-free, hybrid car, or car-lite (one car for a family)-1 car, but looking to get 2nd soon
=2 What a relief because I'm the complete opposite of crunchy
But, we didn't circumcise our son and our last child was a water birth at a birthing center.![]()
Anonymous wrote:Nah, you need to hand wash all your clothes, use a sawdust toilet and a solar oven, and family cloth...then you might be crunchy. Oh and a lotus birth.
Anonymous wrote:Breastfeeding (1)
Baby wearing (1)
Cloth diapering (1)
Organic food (1/2)
Vegan/vegetarian/other dietary choices based on environmental impact (1 -- we buy meat and eggs from Polyface and/or another local farm where we know the animals are treated humanely, are free range, and not given antibiotics or hormones)
Recycling (1)
Natural cleaning products (1)
Avoidance of plastic and/or battery-operated toys (1/2 -- we accept them from grandparents and others but generally don't buy them ourselves)
Co-sleeping (1)
Car-free, hybrid car, or car-lite (one car for a family) (0 -- impossible for us right now, but definitely want to get an electric car when we replace DH's commuter car one day)
= 8
Bonus points - gardening and buying local produce and canning it (I'm gonna give that 3 points), natural births with midwives (had two of those, one at home -- how many points do I get for that?), mama cloth (that gets me at least another whole point, I'm guessing), reusable grocery bags/dishcloths instead of paper towels/cloth napkins (1), energy saving measures in the home (1) (this includes keeping thermostat higher/lower than we would prefer, using all energy efficient bulbs way before the law was passed, making efforts to use less water). I'm probably forgetting some stuff but that apparently makes me crunchier than most others who have responded so far.
Total: 16
What do I win?![]()
P.S. If you saw me on the street you would never know any of this about me. These are changes we have been making for years now and we are continuing to evolve. Our ultimate plan is to try to grow and preserve most of our own food and buy the rest locally (seriously!). But we need land to do that ... working on it. Crunchy points = I don't know, infinity?I don't really consider myself that crunchy though. We don't use family cloth yet! When we get there we will have truly arrived, lol.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You left Out a huge one: limiting the number of children you have to replacement level (2) or fewer. It makes most people very uncomfortable to acknowledge the fact that the singlemost 'eco' thing you can do is not overpopulate. All the vegan carless composting you can imagine doesn't even approach the environmental footprint of adding another human to the planet with a life expectancy of 80 years. Really.
That is just stupid. China has one of the worst environmental records of any country, and they severely limit children. It is not "eco" to not have kids. You are essentially limiting the amount of granola babies born. I mean you would instill your crackpot beliefs into your progeny, wouldn't you? It seems that you would want more people raised in this glorious hippie manner.
You don't get it. The carbon impact produced PER PERSON is much smaller in China than in the US in part because of the one child policy.
http://oregonstate.edu/ua/ncs/archives/2009/jul/family-planning-major-environmental-emphasis