Anonymous wrote:he will win DC and Maryland. GOP landslide.

No surprise, add california to the list of failing debt ridden high tax lib states that very will vote for 0bama

who is 17:02? debt has come from the last 75 years of running annual deficits, the highest of which are under Obama.

17:02, grateful if you could say more on where these deficits came from. Thanks.

Anonymous wrote:The US can't afford another 4 years of Obama. I hope you all are wrong.

Please say more.

"It's the economy, stupid." If it is still this bad this time next year the GOP wins, particularly if Romney is the candidate.

he will win DC and Maryland. GOP landslide.

Herman Cain is so much more qualified to be president now than Obama was in 2008. Not even close. I don't get why people on the left don't take him seriously.


Damn straight!

Hope you all put him up. But some how I don't see it happening. Let wait and see what happens when people(republicans) actually have to pull the lever.

Herman Cain is so much more qualified to be president now than Obama was in 2008. Not even close. I don't get why people on the left don't take him seriously.

Damn straight!

Cain is awesome!
http://www.youtube.com/user/BadLipReading#p/c/48076365A788CC3F/0/uE5xZKszXMQ

Herman Cain is so much more qualified to be president now than Obama was in 2008. Not even close. I don't get why people on the left don't take him seriously.

PP
Why do you think that is unbelievable.

Cain's leading in Iowa right now. Unbelievable.

I don't Cain is for real...he has no campaign structure. He is traveling around taking fees for speaking and selling his book.

Against Romney: 25%-Romney is somewhat sane, and can appeal to independents and conservative Democrats. Doesn't seem to pose as much of a threat to liberal interests, so many liberal voter might not be that pushed to vote.

Against Cain: 45%-While Cain is pretty far off the deep end, he hasn't made any serious errors that will scare people off. Will easily get republican vote if nominated, over Obama, as well as independants who already dislike Obama. If he is nominated, many will look over some of his batshit insane policies just because he is not Obama. Liberal voters will be likely to come out to vote against him, but not as much as for Perry and Bachmann.

Against Perry: 50%- While Perry has had some questionable facts that have come out, many will still vote for him just because he is not Obama. Also has the support of racists. Liberals will come out just to vote against this guy.

Against Bachmann: 60%- Pretty much the same as Perry, if she gets nominated a lot will vote for her over Obama, but she has quickly fell from favor.

Average %:45%

As for me, I'm voting for the naked cowboy.

Anonymous wrote:what are you talking about? The question was whether these were bad times for the USA. The answer is yes. There have been other bad times as well, clearly. As for debt to GDP, I don't care who is president and who controls Congress as long as the debt gets under control.

This started with you (it seems to have been you) saying that four more years of Obama would be this country's "final downfall." Much as I wish it were otherwise, the only possibilities are Obama or the Rep. Judging from history, the Rep will be even worse. That's what I'm talking about.

Anonymous wrote:Right now it is clear that Obama is not the man to control the debt as he will have the four largest annual deficits in history after the end of his first term.

Why did you suddenly forget to adjust for GDP? These aren't close to the largest adjusted deficits.