Anonymous wrote:... Every school has a mix and full pay families are needed more than ever now. It's just thatI don't think its so bad that we are going back to a solely private pay only system. I think privates probably gave that up for a better tax status years ago and can't ever go back on that.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the "diversity" of which you speak?
Go on a tour and see for yourself. AD's spend a great deal of time and energy striking a balance. To answer your question I would say that in DC's school there are the floowing kids of diversity: ethnic,racial,economic,sexuality,native language. A sample of five families might be: a bi-racial couple one of whom is an alum and can private pay and donate, an ethiopian child who may get some FA, a lesbian couple who are both white,but full pay, a child who comes from a diplomatic family and primarily speaks Spanish at home,Middle eastern royalty, an AA child , on and on like that, just like Washington in general.
Then I guess we're out: typical McLean Republican (full tuition paying) white man married to white woman.
actually that means you would fit the mold of the other half of the school. Every school has a mix and full pay families are needed more than ever now. It's just thatI don't think its so bad that we are going back to a solely private pay only system. I think privates probably gave that up for a better tax status years ago and can't ever go back on that.
Anonymous wrote:Is anyone uncomfortable with the fact that the public schools are exempt from property taxes? That basically means that these schools are subsidized by any middle and lower middle class family who pays taxes. Therefore, the construction workers, nurses, military families, etc. that can't afford the tuition are, in fact, subsidizing the school, in effect. That is a crazy world.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:What is the "diversity" of which you speak?
Go on a tour and see for yourself. AD's spend a great deal of time and energy striking a balance. To answer your question I would say that in DC's school there are the floowing kids of diversity: ethnic,racial,economic,sexuality,native language. A sample of five families might be: a bi-racial couple one of whom is an alum and can private pay and donate, an ethiopian child who may get some FA, a lesbian couple who are both white,but full pay, a child who comes from a diplomatic family and primarily speaks Spanish at home,Middle eastern royalty, an AA child , on and on like that, just like Washington in general.
Anonymous wrote:For what its worth, FA usually means a discount of 25% to 50%, at best. So, if you make 80K( before taxes) a year and your kid's Tuition is 30K, that means in order to pay $1,500 a month in Tuition or $2,000 a month in tuition you do work two or three jobs because you must also pay: rent,health insurance, utilities and food for two people on the 30K a year that is left. Think about someone willing to live on $2,500 a month for rent, utilities ,food,and health insurance for the 14 years of Pre-K through 12 and imagine their child is the top of his/her class. Do you really resent their 50% discount on tuition?
Anonymous wrote:Moving is easier said than done when you own a house. Nothing is selling in our neighborhood right now - well, that's not completely true, there was a foreclosure that sold a couple of months ago. We do not have the resources to buy another house until our current house sells - which then makes a change of school completely contingent on a conventional sale in the housing market, which right now is terrible. It also adds the extra expense of needing a second car plus the insurance and gas money that would entail, I would assume a higher mortgage/rent since comparable houses in MoCo (at least when we were looking a couple of years ago) cost much more than we currently pay on our mortgage. Not to mention child care expenses we would incur (of which we have none right now due to the close proximity to both of our works allowing DH and I to juggle schedules). Also, the commute for DD is time spent with family - maybe that sounds stupid, but I did a 45 minute commute to school K-12 and loved that time I spent singing in the car with my mom and brother. We send her to a magnet she will bus there (I don't know how long a ride that would be) and lose a good hour+ of time with me and my husband individually due to us being in cars solo making commutes.
We live frugally and well within our means where we are now. I appreciate the pitch for MoCo public schools, but sometimes people on this forum make it sound like you can change houses as easily as you change underwear. Maybe that is true for some people, but I also have to think those people must be much more well off than us. We've crunched the numbers on a move vs. private school, and with the market as it is right now it doesn't add up for us (it would add more expenses than we have budgeted for a private school, not to mention the stress of moving) so we're trying to work with the options we have.
The additional factor is she is pushing very hard for single-sex education and as an educator I feel there is a lot of value in single-sex education for girls, so I'm happy to support that if we can make it work.
Re: post about "deep pockets" - the school we were told had no FA is a big 3 school, which I assumed = deep pockets. Is that inaccurate? Or rather, can you give us some
schools that you would consider to have deep pockets as far as aid is concerned?