Anonymous wrote:I had a third girl. Didn't need her, didn't initially want her (when I saw the pregnancy test +, I cried), but definitely decided to have her (no accident). She is, without a doubt, the best decision I ever made.
For me, and this is only for me, I was all about what made sense, what seemed right, what worked in an equation. I deep down wanted another child but the reasoning wasn't there.
When I decided to go for it, with DH (he REALLY wanted a third), it was my way of accepting life for the crap-shoot it really is. I am not saying one should flout serious risks, either physical or financial, I am just saying that for me, there was NEVER going to be the right choice. I just wanted her. That's it. And she is the best decision I have ever made.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Because there is nothing better in the entire universe than creating a life and holding that little life the minute he/she enters the world. Loving that little person and having them love you back! I would go for it!
Wow. Really? Very short sighted. Children are great. But they are expensive and a drain on the earth. They don't stay little, you know...they have to go to college, buy homes and so on...
Anonymous wrote:Because there is nothing better in the entire universe than creating a life and holding that little life the minute he/she enters the world. Loving that little person and having them love you back! I would go for it!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Since you asked--no, not really.
What is the reason to have a second?
It's a way of building responsibility in the older one. First-born kids are usually more successful, leaders, etc, etc...
Wow. Your younger child must feel *really* valued.
Anonymous wrote:I'm one of 3, as is DH. We can't imagine NOT having 3. We're taking it one kid at a time, of course, but being 1 of 3 was so much fun. There was always a sibling around to interact with. And now that we're older, it still feels festive if one of us can't make a family gathering (say, as we marry and have other commitments). We get along really well, and it's nice to know that we'll have each other as our parents age, particular as we start to need to care for them.
Anonymous wrote:I would like a 3d but am worried we waited too long. I'm now over 40 and there would be a BIG age difference. Now that my 2 are growing up, I really wish there was one more. However, with the risks at my age not sure it is fair to the rest of the family. The desire does not always go away.
Anonymous wrote:I like big families. Big families aren't lonely. They're happy. They banter and fight but they're big and it's fun.
Anonymous wrote:Yes, definitely. You need the third to close the vicious circle. First kid is spoiled and indiferent to your needs,
second is always feeling inferior and inadequate by being second and the third helps the middle one to be
screwed even more by loosing all the short lasting attention and status of a baby of the family for which
he or she will ALWAYs hate the third one, and so now you need the third one to feel entirely optional,
unwanted and uneeded by the first two, being object of being pushed away as due to the age gap
they will just have nothing in common and the fights will be endless.. untill they grow up and see things
in proportion and through parents eyes if they will ever get to be parents.
So yes, definitely. I know so many families with three kids and the deeper you cut the more burnt parents
are and the more screwed further down the road kis are.