Anonymous wrote:I'm a NP who opened this thread because I'm thinking about signing up my 4 year old DS in Kumon. He's also at a play-based preschool, like the other PP and while I love the school, think I need to do more for DS before he goes into KG next year.
I just want to say that this line of argument drives me nuts! Why in the world is that a reason to not teach your child? You're worried about your kid 'knowing too much'??
I'm not the PP who keeps talking about sports, but would you use the same logic in sports? Would you not make your really good swimmer practice as much because you don't want her to be 'too advanced'?
The thinking that we should slow down our kids educational advancements so that they are not 'bored' in school is so disheartening to me.
FWIW, I'm not Asian, but I have a math/science background myself and want to encourage it for DS.
Only voice making any sense. Do the math.
LOL @ 'Do the math.'
I have a DD who LOVES gymnastics. She's actually got some decent talent and I encourage her to practice so she can sharpen her skills and get better!
If you have a kid who is interested in math (or reading, or science, or whatever), wouldn't you want to find ways to encourage/practice those skills also?
My DD might never be a world-class gymnast, but I still want to help her reach her potential. Same with academics. Holding a child back because you're worried they'll be 'bored' seems silly and a somewhat boring/sad way to raise kids.
I'm a NP who opened this thread because I'm thinking about signing up my 4 year old DS in Kumon. He's also at a play-based preschool, like the other PP and while I love the school, think I need to do more for DS before he goes into KG next year.
I just want to say that this line of argument drives me nuts! Why in the world is that a reason to not teach your child? You're worried about your kid 'knowing too much'??
I'm not the PP who keeps talking about sports, but would you use the same logic in sports? Would you not make your really good swimmer practice as much because you don't want her to be 'too advanced'?
The thinking that we should slow down our kids educational advancements so that they are not 'bored' in school is so disheartening to me.
FWIW, I'm not Asian, but I have a math/science background myself and want to encourage it for DS.
Only voice making any sense. Do the math.
Anonymous wrote:As the mother of a high school student and sister of a kindergarten teacher I warn you that this advance instruction often leads to boredom in the classroom come kingergarten because many students will not be as advanced as your child. This begets a whole set of issues. Bored child, frustrated parents, beleaguered teacher.
What is this goal of this advance instruction? What do you hope to accomplish by this leg up? As I often ask, where's the fire? Many schools do not differentiate in math until the upper grades, including some of the most selective privates.
Anonymous wrote:Not worried about DC learning to read naturally. We read a lot of books everyday. I really want to get an edge in math, I "play" math at home with the kids, general counting, etc. We screened at Kumon and they suggested reading first but I only want the math. Has anyone pursued only math for their toddler?
Please share experiences of Junior Kumon with your child. Thanks.
As the mother of a high school student and sister of a kindergarten teacher I warn you that this advance instruction often leads to boredom in the classroom come kingergarten because many students will not be as advanced as your child. This begets a whole set of issues. Bored child, frustrated parents, beleaguered teacher.
What is this goal of this advance instruction? What do you hope to accomplish by this leg up? As I often ask, where's the fire? Many schools do not differentiate in math until the upper grades, including some of the most selective privates.
Anonymous wrote:As the mother of a high school student and sister of a kindergarten teacher I warn you that this advance instruction often leads to boredom in the classroom come kingergarten because many students will not be as advanced as your child. This begets a whole set of issues. Bored child, frustrated parents, beleaguered teacher.
What is this goal of this advance instruction? What do you hope to accomplish by this leg up? As I often ask, where's the fire? Many schools do not differentiate in math until the upper grades, including some of the most selective privates.
Anonymous wrote:What on earth are you rabbiting on about? Is this supposed to be funny?
Anonymous wrote:ahead.
I know forcing is your word selection. But, this choice of word is far too mild. I actual have a torture chamber at home for our kids and their lesson plans. They were tortured all the way to academic excellence and the national awards. I tried to get rid of this device but the kids keep coming back for more. I'm not sure what to do. They have chosen the path of masochism.
I have not had a conversation with their brains. I have no glue where their brains want them to be. I'm sure you know where their brains want to be. At least, you know where their brains should be; that is, right behind your own children. Perhaps a functional intracranial MRI will provide glues and targets of where I should position those hyperactive neuronal connections. I guess since we live in the D.C. area the WPSSI will reveal the answer. But, like everyone else he took that 3 years ago with a 99.9 percentile.
Do you also know where their bodies want to be? My 6 year-old swimmer is much faster than the 8 year-olds in the County. I'm not sure where his body wants him to be in terms of pure speed. His body provides me no feedback. The pediatrician says he is in the 94th and 98th percentile for height and weight respectively. There we go agaim, those damn 90 percentiles. he should be (? 50th percentile). Then, he will transform or reprogram from parrot to slow poke fish and not be ahead of where his body would want him to be. If only I could slow down his brain to a station where his brain would want him to be. Sounds vaguely familiar, leave no child, body or brain behind. I mean leave no child, brain or body ahead except, of course, your own children.
Anonymous wrote:I know forcing is your word selection. But, this choice of word is far too mild. I actual have a torture chamber at home for our kids and their lesson plans. They were tortured all the way to academic excellence and the national awards. I tried to get rid of this device but the kids keep coming back for more. I'm not sure what to do. They have chosen the path of masochism.
I have not had a conversation with their brains. I have no glue where their brains want them to be. I'm sure you know where their brains want to be. At least, you know where their brains should be; that is, right behind your own children. Perhaps a functional intracranial MRI will provide glues and targets of where I should position those hyperactive neuronal connections. I guess since we live in the D.C. area the WPSSI will reveal the answer. But, like everyone else he took that 3 years ago with a 99.9 percentile.
Do you also know where their bodies want to be? My 6 year-old swimmer is much faster than the 8 year-olds in the County. I'm not sure where his body wants him to be in terms of pure speed. His body provides me no feedback. The pediatrician says he is in the 94th and 98th percentile for height and weight respectively. There we go agaim, those damn 90 percentiles. Perhaps I'll turn up the torture device and force him to slow and throttle down. Better, yet starve the bloody protoplasm to get him down to where he should be (? 50th percentile). Then, he will transform or reprogram from parrot to slow poke fish and not be ahead of where his body would want him to be. If only I could slow down his brain to a station where his brain would want him to be. Sounds vaguely familiar, leave no child, body or brain behind. I mean leave no child, brain or body ahead except, of course, your own children.
Love this, thanks pp for writing this...