Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I mean, read this forum. Read this thread.

It’s a miracle anyone dates anyone when these are the people you could encounter.

Yea, men ugly inside and outside. This forum makes it really unattractive to me as a woman to go out and date. They hate “older women” eg essentially all women of their own age group are somehow “old hags”. Yakis

This is the first question I ask at date 1: what is your dating range? If I smell crap like that even closely, I’m out with speed of light

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Novelty wears off from women and relationships + T levels drop. As a young man (virgin) the only thing I could think about was wanting a girlfriend and getting laid. Now after several female partners and marriage, I still like female company but realize that being single has a lot of advantages. I’m divorced and definitely won’t want to get married again, and most older women don’t really appeal to me physically. Could I get a younger woman who I’m attracted to for casual relationship? Not easily and this is the case for most men 35+. Women our age become less appealing over time and most of us can’t pull the hot 25 year old.

So. This is why your single. Women can smell a misogynist pig from a mile away.

Nope just biology, it happens to all of us. I freely admit that I’m also less physically attractive than I was when younger, it’s not limited to women. But I need physical attraction to have a relationship and prefer to stay single and focus on raising my kids than get into another relationship that I’m not satisfied with

Anonymous wrote:I mean, read this forum. Read this thread.

It’s a miracle anyone dates anyone when these are the people you could encounter.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The men on here complaining about hot women not being interested in them, women being too independent, women being "crazy' . . . instead of taking ownership of their choices, their prejudices, their own "requirements" is so, so typical.

Newsflash to those men: that's why your single. Because of you. No one else. And no woman owes you a date, relationship, etc.

I don’t see anyone “complaining.” They are just stating that’s the fact and also the fact that they aren’t interested in old hags. They’ve made their peace with it and have just checked out of dating and are doing other stuff.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The men on here complaining about hot women not being interested in them, women being too independent, women being "crazy' . . . instead of taking ownership of their choices, their prejudices, their own "requirements" is so, so typical.

Newsflash to those men: that's why your single. Because of you. No one else. And no woman owes you a date, relationship, etc.

I don’t see anyone “complaining.” They are just stating that’s the fact and also the fact that they aren’t interested in old hags. They’ve made their peace with it and have just checked out of dating and are doing other stuff.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Novelty wears off from women and relationships + T levels drop. As a young man (virgin) the only thing I could think about was wanting a girlfriend and getting laid. Now after several female partners and marriage, I still like female company but realize that being single has a lot of advantages. I’m divorced and definitely won’t want to get married again, and most older women don’t really appeal to me physically. Could I get a younger woman who I’m attracted to for casual relationship? Not easily and this is the case for most men 35+. Women our age become less appealing over time and most of us can’t pull the hot 25 year old.

So. This is why your single. Women can smell a misogynist pig from a mile away.

Anonymous wrote:The men on here complaining about hot women not being interested in them, women being too independent, women being "crazy' . . . instead of taking ownership of their choices, their prejudices, their own "requirements" is so, so typical.

Newsflash to those men: that's why your single. Because of you. No one else. And no woman owes you a date, relationship, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't hekp when women constantly state that their minimum requirement is 6 foot tall and 200K (preferable more) income per year and between the ages of 25 and 35. That is only about 150,000 men in the US who meet the minimum eligibility requirements for all women.

Maybe adjust your age setting and check what women your own age are looking for. Then you can find an equal partner - alternate paying for dates, building a great connection not just sexual one etc. Why do you even put so much stress on sex and appearance, in your own words, your T levels are low? Just enjoy a normal human connection. Looks fade anyways over time

So women shouldn't need to change their preferences, but men should?

I date the likes: men of my own age group , looks and income.
You want to date much younger women . Maybe change your self assessment, self acceptance, acceptance of your own aging and why you think you should look attractive to much younger people

You sound self-centered. Maybe men and women don't have the same preferences. And maybe not all women have the same preferences as you.

How is that self centered dating equals ? If you want to date someone who has an asset that valuable to you that you don’t have (age, looks etc) then you need to pay up
As I clearly showed you the investment required to buy a hot young educated woman is $10 million in future divorce settlement to her , legally framed as trust to her at the time of marriage.
Young women are smart they on average make more than the men their own age group and would only date and marry much older men for real assets of interest to them

So you have totally unrealistic expectations of what you bring to table.

I have realistic expectations and have no problems finding relationships, was married for 20 years to a high profile man so my algorithm does work.

Same age=partnership based relationship

Much older man = transactional relationship

You're doing it again, where you're notion of "equal" can only be based upon your value judgements. You can't see past your own nose. You are self-centered.

I mean, a 27 yo objectively is not an equal to a 41 yo man. Your dating experience/lack of options should have already taught you this. You are single. I’m not single throughout my life just like most people who date and marry partners of about same age

So you are a social “outcast” in a way thinking that somehow a 27 yo woman who makes 150k would be an equal to a 41 yo veteran male making 150k. That’s not even close! She’s an equal with a hedge fund manager who makes a few million a year

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't hekp when women constantly state that their minimum requirement is 6 foot tall and 200K (preferable more) income per year and between the ages of 25 and 35. That is only about 150,000 men in the US who meet the minimum eligibility requirements for all women.

Maybe adjust your age setting and check what women your own age are looking for. Then you can find an equal partner - alternate paying for dates, building a great connection not just sexual one etc. Why do you even put so much stress on sex and appearance, in your own words, your T levels are low? Just enjoy a normal human connection. Looks fade anyways over time

So women shouldn't need to change their preferences, but men should?

I date the likes: men of my own age group , looks and income.
You want to date much younger women . Maybe change your self assessment, self acceptance, acceptance of your own aging and why you think you should look attractive to much younger people

You sound self-centered. Maybe men and women don't have the same preferences. And maybe not all women have the same preferences as you.

How is that self centered dating equals ? If you want to date someone who has an asset that valuable to you that you don’t have (age, looks etc) then you need to pay up
As I clearly showed you the investment required to buy a hot young educated woman is $10 million in future divorce settlement to her , legally framed as trust to her at the time of marriage.
Young women are smart they on average make more than the men their own age group and would only date and marry much older men for real assets of interest to them

So you have totally unrealistic expectations of what you bring to table.

I have realistic expectations and have no problems finding relationships, was married for 20 years to a high profile man so my algorithm does work.

Same age=partnership based relationship

Much older man = transactional relationship

You're doing it again, where you're notion of "equal" can only be based upon your value judgements. You can't see past your own nose. You are self-centered.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It doesn't hekp when women constantly state that their minimum requirement is 6 foot tall and 200K (preferable more) income per year and between the ages of 25 and 35. That is only about 150,000 men in the US who meet the minimum eligibility requirements for all women.

Maybe adjust your age setting and check what women your own age are looking for. Then you can find an equal partner - alternate paying for dates, building a great connection not just sexual one etc. Why do you even put so much stress on sex and appearance, in your own words, your T levels are low? Just enjoy a normal human connection. Looks fade anyways over time

So women shouldn't need to change their preferences, but men should?

I date the likes: men of my own age group , looks and income.
You want to date much younger women . Maybe change your self assessment, self acceptance, acceptance of your own aging and why you think you should look attractive to much younger people

You sound self-centered. Maybe men and women don't have the same preferences. And maybe not all women have the same preferences as you.

How is that self centered dating equals ? If you want to date someone who has an asset that valuable to you that you don’t have (age, looks etc) then you need to pay up
As I clearly showed you the investment required to buy a hot young educated woman is $10 million in future divorce settlement to her , legally framed as trust to her at the time of marriage.
Young women are smart they on average make more than the men their own age group and would only date and marry much older men for real assets of interest to them

So you have totally unrealistic expectations of what you bring to table.

I have realistic expectations and have no problems finding relationships, was married for 20 years to a high profile man so my algorithm does work.

Same age=partnership based relationship

Much older man = transactional relationship