Anonymous wrote:If it was itemized maybe he was only expensing his portion not the entire bill. You got a free lunch, you could have pick up the bill but you didn't.
Anonymous wrote:It doesn’t matter who asked, you split cost of a date unless equality is for your convenience only.
Anonymous wrote:If it was itemized maybe he was only expensing his portion not the entire bill. You got a free lunch, you could have pick up the bill but you didn't.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow everyone saying cheap, but I’d totally appreciate that he doesn’t needlessly spend money. If his company has a perk, I’d view it as a negative if he ignored it! That’s just leaving money on the table—pure profit going straight to people who have way more money already.
If this was your husband you'd be pissed he was using family money to pay for lunch when the company policy reimburses. Why would a woman expect a man she's dating to be bad with money? That's a red flag too.
Anonymous wrote:Wow everyone saying cheap, but I’d totally appreciate that he doesn’t needlessly spend money. If his company has a perk, I’d view it as a negative if he ignored it! That’s just leaving money on the table—pure profit going straight to people who have way more money already.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Red Flag 🚩
He’s cheap and dishonest.
Move on.
Yes even if not dishonest he’s still cheap and wants to show he’s going to be that way from the start. I could see this as normal for committed partners but not at a first romantic date
The cheap one is the one who didn't split the bill or offer to pay.
Not true - he asked her out for lunch. He pays. If he wanted to be a saver he could have offered a coffee date . Would have allowed him to follow standard dating etiquette (which most women still value a lot), and show at least some chivalry.