Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No where had more rigor than the Blair magnet, nowhere.
TJ has far more rigor.
Let's be honest here
What are you basing that on? Be honest.
DP
The scope of magnet courses at Blair is not as broad as the course selection available at TJ.
Post AP calc and pos AP Physics classes are more robust at TJ with better lab and research facilities.
This is probably a marginal difference but there is a difference.
No dog in this fight but… how do you know? You attended both schools at the same time?
No I look at the curriculum and Blair has fewer post Calc BC classes and fewer post AP physics CEM classes
They just don't have enough kids to offer as much variety as TJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No where had more rigor than the Blair magnet, nowhere.
TJ has far more rigor.
Let's be honest here
What are you basing that on? Be honest.
DP
The scope of magnet courses at Blair is not as broad as the course selection available at TJ.
Post AP calc and pos AP Physics classes are more robust at TJ with better lab and research facilities.
This is probably a marginal difference but there is a difference.
No dog in this fight but… how do you know? You attended both schools at the same time?
Anonymous wrote:I would imagine places like TJ and Blair have really high rigor.
Amongst the privates -- Sidwell is at the top
among the DC publics -- BASIS is at the top for rigor
(former DC private school teacher, DCPS and DCPCS parent)
Anonymous wrote:Have had two go through local independent schools. One went to what I'd say is an average rigor school (akin to a non-magnet public in a wealthy suburb). Kids took 5 to 6 APs at most. Classes were more lecture based. Kid did fine. Second went to a high rigor school. No humanities APs offered but top track kids took at least 5 or 6 APs. All classes throughout were taught like college seminars. Kid also did fine.
In each case, AOs judged the applicant's rigor against their peers. Not against other schools. First kid's schedule would have been considered lower rigor if taken at second kid's school (but, to be fair, first kid's schedule would have been more like second kid's if they went tot he same school). Second kid's schedule would have been the highest rigor (if it were attainable, which I don't think would have been the case, especially with regard to math.
Anonymous wrote:Have had two go through local independent schools. One went to what I'd say is an average rigor school (akin to a non-magnet public in a wealthy suburb). Kids took 5 to 6 APs at most. Classes were more lecture based. Kid did fine. Second went to a high rigor school. No humanities APs offered but top track kids took at least 5 or 6 APs. All classes throughout were taught like college seminars. Kid also did fine.
In each case, AOs judged the applicant's rigor against their peers. Not against other schools. First kid's schedule would have been considered lower rigor if taken at second kid's school (but, to be fair, first kid's schedule would have been more like second kid's if they went tot he same school). Second kid's schedule would have been the highest rigor (if it were attainable, which I don't think would have been the case, especially with regard to math.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The rigor of the school doesn't matter just that you took the most rigorous courses available at your school. The Title 1 where I work always sends the top kids to elite colleges
This is completely wrong. Rigor of the school matters a huge amount. The Title 1 school may send a couple kids to elite colleges but TJ many times that number to top colleges. The percentage that Sidwell or Philips Exeter send to elite colleges is completely different from an average public high school. Yes yes, students are judged within the context of the school, but their school is also judged within the context of other schools.
This isn’t rigorous thinking. The student body at Sidwell or Exeter is incredibly different from “an average public school.” Same for a Title 1 school versus TJ. Assigning the difference in percentages going to elite colleges to the rigor of the high schools without adjusting for these other differences across high schools is faulty reasoning.
Anonymous wrote:^ The point is not to make your student take these. The school will encourage those that are ready! Teachers steer top kids into the hardest path, no parental intervention or knowledge about paths needed.
The point is to assess where your student falls in the context of what is possible at their school and have an honest conversation with the counseling dean on what is possible as foar as colleges for your student where they are not where you wish they were.
No sense pushing ivy+ on your kid with their 1520 and 12 APs that you think is max rigor when those APs are
AP precal, APGeo, Art History, AB cal, Stats, Econ, Gov, CompSci, APBio, APES, APush and APLit in 12th when the strong kids have it 11th.
They are not top rigor. They are likely a little above average or average rigor at most privates or magnets like TJ, MGLWS.
They are not on the path in line for UVA in-state, let alone T20/ivy+
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No where had more rigor than the Blair magnet, nowhere.
TJ has far more rigor.
Let's be honest here
What are you basing that on? Be honest.
DP
The scope of magnet courses at Blair is not as broad as the course selection available at TJ.
Post AP calc and pos AP Physics classes are more robust at TJ with better lab and research facilities.
This is probably a marginal difference but there is a difference.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No where had more rigor than the Blair magnet, nowhere.
TJ has far more rigor.
Let's be honest here
What are you basing that on? Be honest.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The rigor of the school doesn't matter just that you took the most rigorous courses available at your school. The Title 1 where I work always sends the top kids to elite colleges
Do you track how they do one inside? How well does your school prepare them?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The rigor of the school doesn't matter just that you took the most rigorous courses available at your school. The Title 1 where I work always sends the top kids to elite colleges
This is completely wrong. Rigor of the school matters a huge amount. The Title 1 school may send a couple kids to elite colleges but TJ many times that number to top colleges. The percentage that Sidwell or Philips Exeter send to elite colleges is completely different from an average public high school. Yes yes, students are judged within the context of the school, but their school is also judged within the context of other schools.