Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:As a lawyer, I believe that people benefit from hearing different viewpoints. The best way to understand an issue and strengthen your argument is to vigorously defend it. Everyone benefits from having more viewpoints on campus.

That said, I’m astounded when conservatives tell me that their children are being brainwashed by liberal college professors. I had both liberal and conservative professors. It was a thought provoking experience but only a moron is brainwashed by a professor’s political leanings. An intelligent kid can think for themselves.

When I think back to the classes that I took in college, most of them were factual and I don't think there was much room for either a woke or a conservative perspective. I think people that take classes that are woke genuinely want to engage with that subject matter.

People are more careful now about saying racist and sexist things. I don't have a problem with that. It can be hard to study alongside people when you know they think poorly of you.

The only super liberal class I took was a women’s studies class to fill a humanities requirement and there were other options, I just chose that one. I think engaging with people from all walks of life as well as learning how to question and analyze is what makes a lot of students come out of school liberal, not the professors.

Anonymous wrote:As a lawyer, I believe that people benefit from hearing different viewpoints. The best way to understand an issue and strengthen your argument is to vigorously defend it. Everyone benefits from having more viewpoints on campus.

That said, I’m astounded when conservatives tell me that their children are being brainwashed by liberal college professors. I had both liberal and conservative professors. It was a thought provoking experience but only a moron is brainwashed by a professor’s political leanings. An intelligent kid can think for themselves.

When I think back to the classes that I took in college, most of them were factual and I don't think there was much room for either a woke or a conservative perspective. I think people that take classes that are woke genuinely want to engage with that subject matter.

People are more careful now about saying racist and sexist things. I don't have a problem with that. It can be hard to study alongside people when you know they think poorly of you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Hopefully it results in less leftist indoctrination and more education.

Define leftist indoctrination and why wouldn't right-leaning indoctrination occur? Much of Sherif Girgis's viewpoint is informed by Catholicism, which is a mythical belief in a sky daddy that informs a chosen aristocrat to tell you to love and hate certain people by twisting sacred texts. That isn't very educating, just propaganda sanctioned by a religion.

Your response is a great example of leftist indoctrination.

I'm a Christian and probably far more moderate than you. The Catholic Church is just an absolute joke and easily the worst institutional force in our human history.

You're a Christian who refers to God as a "Mythical sky daddy"?

Anonymous wrote:Look at Trump. He attacks elite colleges because it plays well to his less educated followers. Yet, when it comes to his own family and children, they all attended elite schools. The same is true of his cabinet and administration and throughout government. Of course, they know better and understand the value of an elite education. It amazes me that this nonsense sells to their constituents. “Do as I say, not as I do.” I suppose that it’s effective in keeping the underclass in line.

There aren’t many options. You guys infest almost all colleges in the country.

Look at Trump. He attacks elite colleges because it plays well to his less educated followers. Yet, when it comes to his own family and children, they all attended elite schools. The same is true of his cabinet and administration and throughout government. Of course, they know better and understand the value of an elite education. It amazes me that this nonsense sells to their constituents. “Do as I say, not as I do.” I suppose that it’s effective in keeping the underclass in line.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A recent article by Claremont Mckenna College Government Professor Jon Shields defends the merits of hiring "conservatives, not Republicans," arguing that party alignment and institutional affiliation with Conservatism is not the goal, but enhancing real viewpoint diversity and improving methodological discourse amongst Academics: https://www.chronicle.com/article/hire-conservatives-not-republicans. Harvard Law School is in talks of hiring Sherif Girgis, known for his work What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense and his anti-LGBT views in regards to legal protections of marriage. How do you see this improving academia?

At this point, let’s skip the BS and not let you anywhere any college.

Let’s just lock you treasonous Trumpies in a big pen in Times Square and wait until Putin completes the world war you started by n*king all of us.

I will be sad about being in the war you helped Putin execute, but, if the war k*lls you a few seconds before it k*lls me, and I know that, that will be a positive.

Where did this rant come from?

Severe mental illness.

You Trumpies have no consistent ideology of any kind. You’re not at all conservative in any real sense. You’re simply puppets of Putin, helping him destroy the country and conquer us and the world.

You’re tools of an iron boot.

You’re helping to destroy the universities, medical research and freedom of expression.

You’re letting Trump fill Washington with Trump idols.

You have no value.

Someday, maybe real conservatives will return, and we should welcome them to colleges and universities along with everyone else. But you Trumpies aren’t conservatives.

Anonymous wrote:The same rich conservatives convincing you that elite schools are liberal cesspools all graduated from and send their kids to these schools. How come?

Less competition for their own children.

Anonymous wrote:As a lawyer, I believe that people benefit from hearing different viewpoints. The best way to understand an issue and strengthen your argument is to vigorously defend it. Everyone benefits from having more viewpoints on campus.

That said, I’m astounded when conservatives tell me that their children are being brainwashed by liberal college professors. I had both liberal and conservative professors. It was a thought provoking experience but only a moron is brainwashed by a professor’s political leanings. An intelligent kid can think for themselves.

Because they equate not being anti-gay and questioning the status quo as liberal indoctrination.

The same rich conservatives convincing you that elite schools are liberal cesspools all graduated from and send their kids to these schools. How come?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Viewpoint diversity = reasserting the dominance of conservative white male viewpoint.

It’s affirmative action for mediocre white men. Majority of doctorates are now earned by women who might be more likely to have feminist ideas etc so it’s very important to set aside some seats in all top university faculties for dinosaurs.

This! And any "conservative" with a brain wants to make $$$$, and not slave away trying to get a PhD.

That’s the part where all these conservatives’ arguments about the extinction of conservative faculty breaks down. If you’re not at a top research university, your income tops out at maybe…$250,000? And that’s if you go to a very high paying lac like Claremont McKenna. The funny thing is the best job in academia for all these conservatives is the job they hate the most: administration.

As a lawyer, I believe that people benefit from hearing different viewpoints. The best way to understand an issue and strengthen your argument is to vigorously defend it. Everyone benefits from having more viewpoints on campus.

That said, I’m astounded when conservatives tell me that their children are being brainwashed by liberal college professors. I had both liberal and conservative professors. It was a thought provoking experience but only a moron is brainwashed by a professor’s political leanings. An intelligent kid can think for themselves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Viewpoint diversity = reasserting the dominance of conservative white male viewpoint.

It’s affirmative action for mediocre white men. Majority of doctorates are now earned by women who might be more likely to have feminist ideas etc so it’s very important to set aside some seats in all top university faculties for dinosaurs.

Bingo you win nice post seriously good post

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A recent article by Claremont Mckenna College Government Professor Jon Shields defends the merits of hiring "conservatives, not Republicans," arguing that party alignment and institutional affiliation with Conservatism is not the goal, but enhancing real viewpoint diversity and improving methodological discourse amongst Academics: https://www.chronicle.com/article/hire-conservatives-not-republicans. Harvard Law School is in talks of hiring Sherif Girgis, known for his work What Is Marriage? Man and Woman: A Defense and his anti-LGBT views in regards to legal protections of marriage. How do you see this improving academia?

Good for him. We need less snowflakes in work force. They’re just lawsuits waiting to happen.

Lawsuits are brought by white Christian males fool

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Viewpoint diversity = reasserting the dominance of conservative white male viewpoint.

It’s affirmative action for mediocre white men. Majority of doctorates are now earned by women who might be more likely to have feminist ideas etc so it’s very important to set aside some seats in all top university faculties for dinosaurs.

This! And any "conservative" with a brain wants to make $$$$, and not slave away trying to get a PhD.

Anonymous wrote:Viewpoint diversity = reasserting the dominance of conservative white male viewpoint.

It’s affirmative action for mediocre white men. Majority of doctorates are now earned by women who might be more likely to have feminist ideas etc so it’s very important to set aside some seats in all top university faculties for dinosaurs.