Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:39
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
What's your evidence for this? Why should an average grade be a 3.0. Clearly your education didn't teach you to make arguments coherently.
Because a B grade is historically defined as "above average" and "good" work. 90% of students can't be above average in the real world.
Your education didn't teach you the difference between an opinion or a fact either. Grades can be normative (where students receive grades relative to the performance of their fellow students) or fixed (attainment of some pre-determined learning standards.)
Both grading options have their strengths and weaknesses. Grading on a curve at Harvard is rough. Brown writes that 47% of its students were valedictorian or salutatorian of their HS class. It's probably well above that at Harvard.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:38
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/harvard-students-furious-over-plan-061700240.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD1z6z1tIcGmU6fPqnH5QWV3uhzTpM1vKxuoDMfgIee8pKP5-5Jb2PVaqz2ABIctsxhvgX_k7FT1BF1tMxd7scdKqylNQ9MyzBHFXhXce8vi81WmCLoE2DHUFETMwEofazciWuf8_94YZ2pbZPSP7FJSzRoXpo3Jc13EklHRFRj-
The proposal under consideration would limit A grades in undergraduate courses to no more than 20% of the class plus four additional students. Roughly 60% of grades were an A in the academic year ending in mid-2025 at Harvard, more than double the rate in 2006. That fell to 53% in the fall semester after Harvard urged faculty to be more disciplined.
the Harvard vote has the potential to be a catalyst for wider changes. If one of the country’s best known and most prestigious universities declares grade inflation a problem, it could inspire other schools to do the same
A strict cap on A grades is especially harmful to STEM and engineering classes because these courses are often designed around objective problem-solving rather than subjective evaluation. In many STEM courses, it is entirely possible for a large portion of the class to genuinely earn an A by correctly solving problems and mastering the material. Artificially limiting A grades means students could be penalized even when they meet the standard for excellence.
This is different from many discussion, or writing-based classes, where grading can be more comparative and subjective. In STEM, there is often a clear right answer. If 40% of a calculus or engineering class demonstrates mastery, forcing half of them below an A makes grades less accurate, not more meaningful.
The policy would punish success in rigorous technical courses instead of reflecting actual understanding.
You are extremely wrong. STEM grades can be deflated by creating very difficult questions and not spoon feeding example problems throughout the quarter. The burden is on the faculty to create this and create different ones for each section and semester to stay ahead of the Chinese cheaters and frats collecting old tests. An additional mechanism to deflate is to grant no partial credit for any questions.
Humanities courses however evaluated subjectively. What happens in deflation is the papers are rank stacked. Ideally without bias but that is really impossible not to do as a human being. Bias isn’t just racial or gender but bias toward interest, style and other things not intended as part of the evaluation.
No one is suggesting spoon-feeding students with exact exam problems. That’s an exaggerated interpretation of the argument. Professors are fully capable of designing assessments that fairly and rigorously evaluate student competency. The responsibility of faculty is to teach the material clearly and assess whether students have mastered it. If students meet the standards the professor has established, then their grades should reflect that mastery. Imposing minimums or maximum quotas on grades undermines that process by taking discretion away from the professor, the person most qualified to evaluate student performance and determine whether academic standards have been met.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:33
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
As crazy as it sounds, Harvard may be a bad choice for those who are pre-law. The law schools appear to be indifferent to undergraduate schools and majors and instead focused on LSAT scores and GPAs. For all of the top law schools, the median undergraduate GPA is above 3.90. This is very different from my law school experience several decades ago. I went to a top law school and well more than 25% of my class came from T10 colleges.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:25
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Students at Harvard are no smarter than they were in the 90's, and back then the average GPA was below 3.5.
Standards have gotten softer. There should be corrective measures to fix this issue. However, I do fear that lowering GPAs will hurt Harvard students seeking medical and law school admissions.
will not affect it at all. they consider the undergrad ranges of GPAs as the undergrads send that info to med and law schools. top half of an ivy is top half of an ivy no matter if the median is 3.9 at Harvard or 3.5 at Cornell.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:23
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/harvard-students-furious-over-plan-061700240.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD1z6z1tIcGmU6fPqnH5QWV3uhzTpM1vKxuoDMfgIee8pKP5-5Jb2PVaqz2ABIctsxhvgX_k7FT1BF1tMxd7scdKqylNQ9MyzBHFXhXce8vi81WmCLoE2DHUFETMwEofazciWuf8_94YZ2pbZPSP7FJSzRoXpo3Jc13EklHRFRj-
The proposal under consideration would limit A grades in undergraduate courses to no more than 20% of the class plus four additional students. Roughly 60% of grades were an A in the academic year ending in mid-2025 at Harvard, more than double the rate in 2006. That fell to 53% in the fall semester after Harvard urged faculty to be more disciplined.
the Harvard vote has the potential to be a catalyst for wider changes. If one of the country’s best known and most prestigious universities declares grade inflation a problem, it could inspire other schools to do the same
A strict cap on A grades is especially harmful to STEM and engineering classes because these courses are often designed around objective problem-solving rather than subjective evaluation. In many STEM courses, it is entirely possible for a large portion of the class to genuinely earn an A by correctly solving problems and mastering the material. Artificially limiting A grades means students could be penalized even when they meet the standard for excellence.
This is different from many discussion, or writing-based classes, where grading can be more comparative and subjective. In STEM, there is often a clear right answer. If 40% of a calculus or engineering class demonstrates mastery, forcing half of them below an A makes grades less accurate, not more meaningful.
The policy would punish success in rigorous technical courses instead of reflecting actual understanding.
You are extremely wrong. STEM grades can be deflated by creating very difficult questions and not spoon feeding example problems throughout the quarter. The burden is on the faculty to create this and create different ones for each section and semester to stay ahead of the Chinese cheaters and frats collecting old tests. An additional mechanism to deflate is to grant no partial credit for any questions.
Humanities courses however evaluated subjectively. What happens in deflation is the papers are rank stacked. Ideally without bias but that is really impossible not to do as a human being. Bias isn’t just racial or gender but bias toward interest, style and other things not intended as part of the evaluation.
What’s the purpose of very difficult questions if you aren’t preparing the students for that content? At some point, you’re no longer teaching and just dick measuring- which is great, only fans is always available, but that is not the point of an undergraduate college.
Also why try anything new in this system if you know there’s at least 10-20% of people who are selected by the institution to be really good at x subject.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:15
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/harvard-students-furious-over-plan-061700240.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD1z6z1tIcGmU6fPqnH5QWV3uhzTpM1vKxuoDMfgIee8pKP5-5Jb2PVaqz2ABIctsxhvgX_k7FT1BF1tMxd7scdKqylNQ9MyzBHFXhXce8vi81WmCLoE2DHUFETMwEofazciWuf8_94YZ2pbZPSP7FJSzRoXpo3Jc13EklHRFRj-
The proposal under consideration would limit A grades in undergraduate courses to no more than 20% of the class plus four additional students. Roughly 60% of grades were an A in the academic year ending in mid-2025 at Harvard, more than double the rate in 2006. That fell to 53% in the fall semester after Harvard urged faculty to be more disciplined.
the Harvard vote has the potential to be a catalyst for wider changes. If one of the country’s best known and most prestigious universities declares grade inflation a problem, it could inspire other schools to do the same
A strict cap on A grades is especially harmful to STEM and engineering classes because these courses are often designed around objective problem-solving rather than subjective evaluation. In many STEM courses, it is entirely possible for a large portion of the class to genuinely earn an A by correctly solving problems and mastering the material. Artificially limiting A grades means students could be penalized even when they meet the standard for excellence.
This is different from many discussion, or writing-based classes, where grading can be more comparative and subjective. In STEM, there is often a clear right answer. If 40% of a calculus or engineering class demonstrates mastery, forcing half of them below an A makes grades less accurate, not more meaningful.
The policy would punish success in rigorous technical courses instead of reflecting actual understanding.
You are extremely wrong. STEM grades can be deflated by creating very difficult questions and not spoon feeding example problems throughout the quarter. The burden is on the faculty to create this and create different ones for each section and semester to stay ahead of the Chinese cheaters and frats collecting old tests. An additional mechanism to deflate is to grant no partial credit for any questions.
Humanities courses however evaluated subjectively. What happens in deflation is the papers are rank stacked. Ideally without bias but that is really impossible not to do as a human being. Bias isn’t just racial or gender but bias toward interest, style and other things not intended as part of the evaluation.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:09
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
It doesn't seem anyone on here thinks students who don't[ deserve C's should get A. So you're missing the point.
If most people do not produce A work (as you suggest), then don't give the damn A. And that doesn't matter if they are at Harvard or a T200 school. It should have nothing to do with quotas. I'd be fine with professors giving zero A's, or all A's, if that is what the students deserve.
^take out the "don't"
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:09
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
What's your evidence for this? Why should an average grade be a 3.0. Clearly your education didn't teach you to make arguments coherently.
Because a B grade is historically defined as "above average" and "good" work. 90% of students can't be above average in the real world.
How old are you? B has been average for decades.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:06
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
It doesn't seem anyone on here thinks students who don't deserve C's should get A. So you're missing the point.
If most people do not produce A work (as you suggest), then don't give the damn A. And that doesn't matter if they are at Harvard or a T200 school. It should have nothing to do with quotas. I'd be fine with professors giving zero A's, or all A's, if that is what the students deserve.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 21:04
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
Why is it bad for everyone. What’s the actual, practical bad outcome?
Anonymous
05/13/2026 20:54
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
What's your evidence for this? Why should an average grade be a 3.0. Clearly your education didn't teach you to make arguments coherently.
Because a B grade is historically defined as "above average" and "good" work. 90% of students can't be above average in the real world.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 20:51
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Good. Grades were overly inflated by all accounts.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 20:51
Subject: Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://sg.finance.yahoo.com/news/harvard-students-furious-over-plan-061700240.html?guccounter=1&guce_referrer=aHR0cHM6Ly93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbS8&guce_referrer_sig=AQAAAD1z6z1tIcGmU6fPqnH5QWV3uhzTpM1vKxuoDMfgIee8pKP5-5Jb2PVaqz2ABIctsxhvgX_k7FT1BF1tMxd7scdKqylNQ9MyzBHFXhXce8vi81WmCLoE2DHUFETMwEofazciWuf8_94YZ2pbZPSP7FJSzRoXpo3Jc13EklHRFRj-
The proposal under consideration would limit A grades in undergraduate courses to no more than 20% of the class plus four additional students. Roughly 60% of grades were an A in the academic year ending in mid-2025 at Harvard, more than double the rate in 2006. That fell to 53% in the fall semester after Harvard urged faculty to be more disciplined.
the Harvard vote has the potential to be a catalyst for wider changes. If one of the country’s best known and most prestigious universities declares grade inflation a problem, it could inspire other schools to do the same
A strict cap on A grades is especially harmful to STEM and engineering classes because these courses are often designed around objective problem-solving rather than subjective evaluation. In many STEM courses, it is entirely possible for a large portion of the class to genuinely earn an A by correctly solving problems and mastering the material. Artificially limiting A grades means students could be penalized even when they meet the standard for excellence.
This is different from many discussion, or writing-based classes, where grading can be more comparative and subjective. In STEM, there is often a clear right answer. If 40% of a calculus or engineering class demonstrates mastery, forcing half of them below an A makes grades less accurate, not more meaningful.
The policy would punish success in rigorous technical courses instead of reflecting actual understanding.
In a history or philosophy class, if everybody writes excellent papers and demonstrates mastery of the material, and performs at an A level, it would be unethical not to give them the grades they deserve. If they all deserve an A they all get an A.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 20:49
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone
What's your evidence for this? Why should an average grade be a 3.0. Clearly your education didn't teach you to make arguments coherently.
Anonymous
05/13/2026 20:47
Subject: Re:Harvard faculty vote to limit A grades to no more than 20% of the class
Anonymous wrote:Anybody who does A work needs to get an A on their transcript. Doing otherwise means the grades are meaningless.
What grades others get has nothing to do with my grade.
Most people do not produce true A work. The average grade should be a 3.0. Only those very much above average should get a 4.0. Grade inflation is bad for everyone