Anonymous wrote:People who are naturally good looking have way easier lives than someone who is wealthy but unattractive. I do think at a certain point, money and fame can make up for lack of good looks, but this is a level that is unattainable for most people (centimillionaire or higher).

If you’re a man born ugly, short, bald, small member, etc (something that is not easily fixable) even if you achieve decent upper middle class wealth, think 5-10M, your overall quality of life will be worse than a guy who is a broke or LMC “Chad”.

I fall into this category. I’m a man who is unattractive and never got attention from women until my late 20’s when career took off, but even then it was difficult. I live a comfortable life with above average wealth, but not enough to live a baller lifestyle like you see in the movies. I have family members who are poorer than me but better looking and act passive aggressive jealous about my finances vs theirs, but they don’t realize how much better their social & dating lives were compared to mine because they’re conventionally good looking. I would trade all my money to be born as a man with top 5% looks and live paycheck to paycheck.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:People who are naturally good looking have way easier lives than someone who is wealthy but unattractive. I do think at a certain point, money and fame can make up for lack of good looks, but this is a level that is unattainable for most people (centimillionaire or higher).

If you’re a man born ugly, short, bald, small member, etc (something that is not easily fixable) even if you achieve decent upper middle class wealth, think 5-10M, your overall quality of life will be worse than a guy who is a broke or LMC “Chad”.

I fall into this category. I’m a man who is unattractive and never got attention from women until my late 20’s when career took off, but even then it was difficult. I live a comfortable life with above average wealth, but not enough to live a baller lifestyle like you see in the movies. I have family members who are poorer than me but better looking and act passive aggressive jealous about my finances vs theirs, but they don’t realize how much better their social & dating lives were compared to mine because they’re conventionally good looking. I would trade all my money to be born as a man with top 5% looks and live paycheck to paycheck.

you are still better off than an equally unattractive female

Anonymous wrote:People who are naturally good looking have way easier lives than someone who is wealthy but unattractive. I do think at a certain point, money and fame can make up for lack of good looks, but this is a level that is unattainable for most people (centimillionaire or higher).

If you’re a man born ugly, short, bald, small member, etc (something that is not easily fixable) even if you achieve decent upper middle class wealth, think 5-10M, your overall quality of life will be worse than a guy who is a broke or LMC “Chad”.

I fall into this category. I’m a man who is unattractive and never got attention from women until my late 20’s when career took off, but even then it was difficult. I live a comfortable life with above average wealth, but not enough to live a baller lifestyle like you see in the movies. I have family members who are poorer than me but better looking and act passive aggressive jealous about my finances vs theirs, but they don’t realize how much better their social & dating lives were compared to mine because they’re conventionally good looking. I would trade all my money to be born as a man with top 5% looks and live paycheck to paycheck.

Anonymous wrote:It’s absolutely your personality.

Anonymous wrote:I can't read this thoroughly or take you seriously but I read the "small member" part and FFS. This is not something that reasonable, healthy, normal women really consider or reject people for. Clinical abnormality? I mean, sure. But just a regular old small d? B****, please.