Anonymous wrote:So only team sport is baseball.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Soccer, lacrosse, hockey, football, basketball, baseball - do they all favor the biggest kids? As long as they have decent mechanics/skill will the edge always go to the larger kid?
YES, if you attend enough tryouts (multiple sports but especially basketball) you will observe the shorter kids pulled off to the side or eliminated early before they even have a chance to show off their superior skills. Our youngest in middle school falls into this trap while our older, taller sons were given more opportunities to be fairly evaluated.
Anonymous wrote:Soccer, lacrosse, hockey, football, basketball, baseball - do they all favor the biggest kids? As long as they have decent mechanics/skill will the edge always go to the larger kid?
Anonymous wrote:Again, look at professional athlete average heights and that will tell you how college and high school coaches are biased.
According to Google, the sports below are essentially the only pro sports where the average height for men and women is less than 5'10" and 5'8", respectively:
Marathoners
Gymnasts (many argue that the sport itself is partially responsible for keeping gymnasts small and that many would have grown taller if they had not started the sport so young)
Ski Jumpers
Lightweight to lower bands of Middle Weight for basically any sport specifically built around weight: boxing, UFC, wrestling, et al (i.e., people are mentioning wrestling here, but you won't find many short wrestlers at heaviest weight classes)
Female ice skaters...average for men is 5'10"
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it is a bummer that the team sports favors the bigger kids, at least once they get to be teenagers. I have a very athletic kid who is one of the best on his soccer team and one of the better ones on his baseball team. He is 9 and 4'2" and 55 lbs.
In soccer he is fast and agile and can and does score. He plays wing or striker, depending on where the coach needs him.
In baseball he is currently playing mostly infield and he is a pretty good pitcher, at least at this level. The bigger issue with the infield is that he is a lefty. It's ok now because he is a good fielder with quick reflexes but it won't always be that way. If he continues with baseball, he is going to have to rely on his speed and his arm to be an outfielder. I'm pretty sure he isn't going to be tall enough to play first base.
He loves sports and is good at them but I worry when all the kids hit puberty. We think he is also going to be a late bloomer in that area, so its going to be tough.
Your kid is only 9, so just wait and see what happens.
On the plus side of being smaller when younger, is that we saw so many players where their only attribute was that they're big. And they never really learned how to do anything properly. It eventually gets to a point where those players can't keep up with the rest of the players and can't really do anything else.
At the middle school level, I was happy to see smaller players we knew make their teams. I think those players were deserving due to their high skill and iq level. I was kind of worried that they wouldn't get a fair opportunity due to their size but they all made it that year.
There was one player at sixth grade, who was on the smaller side but when we saw him the following year, he had a growth spurt and I hardly recognized him anymore.
So just wait and see what happens.
btw to answer OP's question, I would think in baseball size is less of a factor and knew some really good small players at the youth level. I forget which MLB player said baseball is a sport where size doesn't matter. And in basketball, I see smaller players wreck havoc on the court by being quick, aggressive and having a high basketball iq. Always getting steals, always killing other teams with smart plays, etc.
This is the OP of that post. I hope you are right. My son is adopted so we don’t know his genetics. His birth mother is 5’0”, but so am I so any child I have would have small genetics. We don’t know anything else.
NP here. I feel compelled to respond to your post as a short adult adoptee who is also a parent to an adoptee as well as a baseball player (2 different kids)!
Your son has a lot going for him as a lefty pitcher! Coaches will love that. I also see a good number of 1B who are either average height or surprisingly actually on the short side. I'm talking about high school and travel ball, btw- clearly not the MLB!
PS- you never know about your son's height- genetics are funny like that!
Just to add..Georgetown Prep's best player from 2025 is a lefty pitcher who played on the USA Baseball 18U national team and will likely get drafted into the MLB. He is over 6'0"...but not one of these 6'8" pitchers...I would say his like 6'1".
He is also adopted!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it is a bummer that the team sports favors the bigger kids, at least once they get to be teenagers. I have a very athletic kid who is one of the best on his soccer team and one of the better ones on his baseball team. He is 9 and 4'2" and 55 lbs.
In soccer he is fast and agile and can and does score. He plays wing or striker, depending on where the coach needs him.
In baseball he is currently playing mostly infield and he is a pretty good pitcher, at least at this level. The bigger issue with the infield is that he is a lefty. It's ok now because he is a good fielder with quick reflexes but it won't always be that way. If he continues with baseball, he is going to have to rely on his speed and his arm to be an outfielder. I'm pretty sure he isn't going to be tall enough to play first base.
He loves sports and is good at them but I worry when all the kids hit puberty. We think he is also going to be a late bloomer in that area, so its going to be tough.
Your kid is only 9, so just wait and see what happens.
On the plus side of being smaller when younger, is that we saw so many players where their only attribute was that they're big. And they never really learned how to do anything properly. It eventually gets to a point where those players can't keep up with the rest of the players and can't really do anything else.
At the middle school level, I was happy to see smaller players we knew make their teams. I think those players were deserving due to their high skill and iq level. I was kind of worried that they wouldn't get a fair opportunity due to their size but they all made it that year.
There was one player at sixth grade, who was on the smaller side but when we saw him the following year, he had a growth spurt and I hardly recognized him anymore.
So just wait and see what happens.
btw to answer OP's question, I would think in baseball size is less of a factor and knew some really good small players at the youth level. I forget which MLB player said baseball is a sport where size doesn't matter. And in basketball, I see smaller players wreck havoc on the court by being quick, aggressive and having a high basketball iq. Always getting steals, always killing other teams with smart plays, etc.
This is the OP of that post. I hope you are right. My son is adopted so we don’t know his genetics. His birth mother is 5’0”, but so am I so any child I have would have small genetics. We don’t know anything else.
NP here. I feel compelled to respond to your post as a short adult adoptee who is also a parent to an adoptee as well as a baseball player (2 different kids)!
Your son has a lot going for him as a lefty pitcher! Coaches will love that. I also see a good number of 1B who are either average height or surprisingly actually on the short side. I'm talking about high school and travel ball, btw- clearly not the MLB!
PS- you never know about your son's height- genetics are funny like that!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, it is a bummer that the team sports favors the bigger kids, at least once they get to be teenagers. I have a very athletic kid who is one of the best on his soccer team and one of the better ones on his baseball team. He is 9 and 4'2" and 55 lbs.
In soccer he is fast and agile and can and does score. He plays wing or striker, depending on where the coach needs him.
In baseball he is currently playing mostly infield and he is a pretty good pitcher, at least at this level. The bigger issue with the infield is that he is a lefty. It's ok now because he is a good fielder with quick reflexes but it won't always be that way. If he continues with baseball, he is going to have to rely on his speed and his arm to be an outfielder. I'm pretty sure he isn't going to be tall enough to play first base.
He loves sports and is good at them but I worry when all the kids hit puberty. We think he is also going to be a late bloomer in that area, so its going to be tough.
Your kid is only 9, so just wait and see what happens.
On the plus side of being smaller when younger, is that we saw so many players where their only attribute was that they're big. And they never really learned how to do anything properly. It eventually gets to a point where those players can't keep up with the rest of the players and can't really do anything else.
At the middle school level, I was happy to see smaller players we knew make their teams. I think those players were deserving due to their high skill and iq level. I was kind of worried that they wouldn't get a fair opportunity due to their size but they all made it that year.
There was one player at sixth grade, who was on the smaller side but when we saw him the following year, he had a growth spurt and I hardly recognized him anymore.
So just wait and see what happens.
btw to answer OP's question, I would think in baseball size is less of a factor and knew some really good small players at the youth level. I forget which MLB player said baseball is a sport where size doesn't matter. And in basketball, I see smaller players wreck havoc on the court by being quick, aggressive and having a high basketball iq. Always getting steals, always killing other teams with smart plays, etc.
This is the OP of that post. I hope you are right. My son is adopted so we don’t know his genetics. His birth mother is 5’0”, but so am I so any child I have would have small genetics. We don’t know anything else.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wrestling.
Greatest sport for life. If you can survive everything else in life is easier.
Wrestling is the answer for an undersized kid. Late bloomers can do especially well, because a 106 pound junior/senior will be wrestling freshmen most of the time.
Anonymous wrote:Baseball don't care. Especially with modern stats analysis. Alejandro Kirk (Blue Jays catcher) case in point. If you watched the World Series last year, you might remember that the announcers spent the whole series making fun of how fat he is. And only 5'8".
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So only team sport is baseball.
Even if smaller players absolutely do make it in baseball (and softball for girls), youth coaches absolutely favor the taller / broader kids.
Anonymous wrote:Much of track and field is not for the stocky.