Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know plenty of women with big families in the DMV; they aren’t well represented on this board though. My mom had a bunch of kids and I’m so grateful for that. The sibling who is far younger than I am (by nine years) is all our favorite sib and she rocks! Materially, we didn’t have a lot of cash. My parents were often in debt. But not having nice clothes or a fancy wedding didn’t make us sad. We grew up like most Americans and things usually worked out. I didn’t even know I was “lower” middle class until I went to college and saw the wealth that others took for granted. I’ll take relationships over materialism any day. I saw that privileged backgrounds didn’t make my peers happy or emotionally well. That has informed my own approach to parenting. My kids are currently begging for a sixth. I’ve thought a lot about the arguments that ARE well represented here (resource issues, division of time, not being able to keep up with the activity culture, special needs, etc.) and I realize those aren’t relevant for my situation. I’m blessed with health and a great job so I’m going to make a less obvious choice…just be open to having more kids. When it comes to time spent per kid, I think people overestimate how much time older kids take and need and want from their parents (minus the driving—the chauffeuring is tough!). (I know I didn’t want my parents breathing down my neck once I hit a certain age. In junior high and high school, my only child friends were always trying to hang out with my family and get away from their parents!) Also, my kids love being with each other, all piling on my lap to read a book. We have fun together. We try to do one on one time, and it all works out. All to say, all sizes of family are beautiful. But I think sometimes some people prematurely opt out of more kids or make a permanent family planning decision out of shifting fears that aren’t relevant to them or are overblown. It’s ok to not want another at age 42, but you are consciously making that decision.
I have 5 and mine are also asking to have another sibling! A subsequent poster mentioned that teens need time- which is true- but I find my teens seek out that time at different times than their younger siblings. It does mean you’re always “on” or prepared to be “on” though if you have a lot of kids.
Anonymous wrote:I know plenty of women with big families in the DMV; they aren’t well represented on this board though. My mom had a bunch of kids and I’m so grateful for that. The sibling who is far younger than I am (by nine years) is all our favorite sib and she rocks! Materially, we didn’t have a lot of cash. My parents were often in debt. But not having nice clothes or a fancy wedding didn’t make us sad. We grew up like most Americans and things usually worked out. I didn’t even know I was “lower” middle class until I went to college and saw the wealth that others took for granted. I’ll take relationships over materialism any day. I saw that privileged backgrounds didn’t make my peers happy or emotionally well. That has informed my own approach to parenting. My kids are currently begging for a sixth. I’ve thought a lot about the arguments that ARE well represented here (resource issues, division of time, not being able to keep up with the activity culture, special needs, etc.) and I realize those aren’t relevant for my situation. I’m blessed with health and a great job so I’m going to make a less obvious choice…just be open to having more kids. When it comes to time spent per kid, I think people overestimate how much time older kids take and need and want from their parents (minus the driving—the chauffeuring is tough!). (I know I didn’t want my parents breathing down my neck once I hit a certain age. In junior high and high school, my only child friends were always trying to hang out with my family and get away from their parents!) Also, my kids love being with each other, all piling on my lap to read a book. We have fun together. We try to do one on one time, and it all works out. All to say, all sizes of family are beautiful. But I think sometimes some people prematurely opt out of more kids or make a permanent family planning decision out of shifting fears that aren’t relevant to them or are overblown. It’s ok to not want another at age 42, but you are consciously making that decision.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s SO much better to want one more than one fewer. You have some bandwidth now - great!! Do something else with it - go for a promotion at work, volunteer, adopt a dog, something.
Amen. I think when you already have three and a bigger gap, you have to think of the impact it will have on the kids who are already here.
Yall. I have so many siblings and they are the BEST thing, even though it meant less $$ to go around. Siblings are a support network for life. It is soooo much more important to have them than to have better clothes and a Disney trip. Think about old age for your kids, not just the size of the pile of Christmas presents they’ll get over the next few years.
Then you’re an outliner. I don’t know any adults who are close to their siblings. People get busy with their own lives and their own kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I want a third but am resolutely stopping at 2 because I know it would negatively impact the two I have. Older children do not really want or benefit from another much younger sibling.
False.
You have kids for you, not to give your kids siblings who may or may not get along.
This is a matter of opinion and personal preference, but I personally feel that 3+ kids takes some or the pressure off sibling dynamics. I grew up in a 2 kid family and always wished I had more siblings. We don't have a bad relationship as adults, but we also don’t really click. My spouse has 3 siblings and gets something different out of each relationship (some more, some less). I like that more. No, there are no guarantees about who your kids will be and what they will prefer — some us just grow up wanting the opposite of what they have! — but I do think that many people like having sibling relationships and it can be nice when there are more than one.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s SO much better to want one more than one fewer. You have some bandwidth now - great!! Do something else with it - go for a promotion at work, volunteer, adopt a dog, something.
Amen. I think when you already have three and a bigger gap, you have to think of the impact it will have on the kids who are already here.
Yall. I have so many siblings and they are the BEST thing, even though it meant less $$ to go around. Siblings are a support network for life. It is soooo much more important to have them than to have better clothes and a Disney trip. Think about old age for your kids, not just the size of the pile of Christmas presents they’ll get over the next few years.
Then you’re an outliner. I don’t know any adults who are close to their siblings. People get busy with their own lives and their own kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s SO much better to want one more than one fewer. You have some bandwidth now - great!! Do something else with it - go for a promotion at work, volunteer, adopt a dog, something.
Amen. I think when you already have three and a bigger gap, you have to think of the impact it will have on the kids who are already here.
Yall. I have so many siblings and they are the BEST thing, even though it meant less $$ to go around. Siblings are a support network for life. It is soooo much more important to have them than to have better clothes and a Disney trip. Think about old age for your kids, not just the size of the pile of Christmas presents they’ll get over the next few years.