Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Really, OP? It was a surprise party that she didn't know about...and you don't know the host.
If you're a Stage 5 Clinger, go ahead and ruminate yourself into a puddle over this. She sounds like a nice woman who has gone out of her way to connect with you, and at the first sign of non-inclusion (that was NOT her fault), you're doing this? OK.
What is op doing exactly? She didn't show up at the party uninvited, she didn't roll on the floor crying and she did not complain to the bday lady. It's okay to have thoughts about situations.
Anonymous wrote:Oh that stinks! I'm sorry.
In case it helps ease the sting, I've been fortunate to have been thrown 3 surprise parties and for two of them the host assembled a very odd mix of people in my life. They weren't up to date on my newest or closest friends so it was awkward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Never talked about the job hunting process or anything related to the job, or why she wanted it in the first place (her husband makes $$$$). Just a lack of being real.
And this is why people are vague. Who are you to label her as not "real"? Who are you to question the validity of her working? In what world is her husband's salary your business? You are aware that there's reasons to keep working, even if you're married to a rich guy, right (and that for many of us, that's not the jackpot you think it is)?
Sometimes I can't with this board.
Jesus lady. If you were going to the gym with someone every week, chit chatting about all kinds of personal stuff, for almost 2 years and then out of nowhere she says “I’ll be starting a job next week, so I won’t be able to work out with you anymore” you wouldn’t think “oh, I guess we’re not that close.” It’s keeping someone at arms length.
Anonymous wrote:Really, OP? It was a surprise party that she didn't know about...and you don't know the host.
If you're a Stage 5 Clinger, go ahead and ruminate yourself into a puddle over this. She sounds like a nice woman who has gone out of her way to connect with you, and at the first sign of non-inclusion (that was NOT her fault), you're doing this? OK.
Anonymous wrote:Never talked about the job hunting process or anything related to the job, or why she wanted it in the first place (her husband makes $$$$). Just a lack of being real.
And this is why people are vague. Who are you to label her as not "real"? Who are you to question the validity of her working? In what world is her husband's salary your business? You are aware that there's reasons to keep working, even if you're married to a rich guy, right (and that for many of us, that's not the jackpot you think it is)?
Sometimes I can't with this board.
Anonymous wrote:Never talked about the job hunting process or anything related to the job, or why she wanted it in the first place (her husband makes $$$$). Just a lack of being real.
And this is why people are vague. Who are you to label her as not "real"? Who are you to question the validity of her working? In what world is her husband's salary your business? You are aware that there's reasons to keep working, even if you're married to a rich guy, right (and that for many of us, that's not the jackpot you think it is)?
Sometimes I can't with this board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why on earth are you faulting your new friend, if you know she didn't know about the party???
I feel DCUM has been overrun with stupid posts recently. Maybe they're all AI.
Did you read the post? Nobody is faulting the friend.
Wrong. OP is suggesting the “new friend” should have told her she wished she’d been invited by the other woman to the party. As a result, she’s worried that the “new friend” just sees her as an acquaintance.
OP needs thicker skin or she’ll go through the rest of her life obsessing over various slights, real or imagined.
This. OP would be expecting birthday person to fault the host. Find blame for jow they managed a surprise party. OMG.