Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone except the private business get to decide where they locate?
(Washington, DC) – Today, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced that the District of Columbia and Children’s National Hospital have reached an exclusive one-year agreement to evaluate sites for a new hospital campus within the District. To support this effort, the Mayor has proposed $1 million in her FY26 Supplemental Budget to fund comprehensive site assessments and due diligence.
Anonymous wrote:Why does anyone except the private business get to decide where they locate?
(Washington, DC) – Today, Mayor Muriel Bowser announced that the District of Columbia and Children’s National Hospital have reached an exclusive one-year agreement to evaluate sites for a new hospital campus within the District. To support this effort, the Mayor has proposed $1 million in her FY26 Supplemental Budget to fund comprehensive site assessments and due diligence.
Anonymous wrote:They had a reduction in force last year big enough to make the Washington Post and they can afford this?
Anonymous wrote:Haven’t read the whole chain but what about one of the federal buildings in the district that GSA is offloading?
Anonymous wrote:Should move out to Largo Town Center to be more accessible.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Folks, it's stressful to get to the current location from certain parts of town.
Wherever they move will have the same problem.
People who live close to the current location do not find it hard to get there. If you live in Petworth, Brookland, Capitol Hill, etc., the current location is pretty great. If you live across the river or Georgetown, it's a pain. But moving it to another neighborhood doesn't solve this problem, it just shifts who it is convenient for and who it's not convenient for.
Also the people complaining about the difficulty of reaching the current location and the parking garage in the same breath are working at cross purposes. A more central location would make it more accessible by public transit, but would likely make parking even worse than it currently is. You also have to think about emergency vehicle traffic -- the current location can be a pain to drive to but there are advantages of being near the junction of two major thoroughfares with multiple lanes, because it makes it easier for ambulances to get to there.
One of the major features of Children's is that it is the only Trauma 1 level children's ER in the entire region. So ER accessibility is really important, more so than access to specialists, sadly for those of us whose kids need to see specialists there frequently!
Hospital location can be really difficult. I am not sure I can think of a site elsewhere in the city that is obviously superior to their current site, even though I totally understand what is not ideal about the current site.
Is INOVA Childrens in Fairfax not Level 1 Trauma? (I'm unsure).
Inova Fairfax Hospital is a Level 1 Trauma center and handles all ages.
Childrens is the only local Level 1 Trauma that only serves pediatric patients.
Anonymous wrote:They had a reduction in force last year big enough to make the Washington Post and they can afford this?
Anonymous wrote:No, they should be required to stay at the location in NE. DC is full and the satellite location in Ward 4, at the Walter Reed location.
Anonymous wrote:public transportation is important but so is parking. How many people take the metro with a sick child? Not many.