Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grace is speaking. Just recycling all of the talking points we’ve heard from them before.
And then just restates all of the ways MCPS communicated about the Boundary Study as a defense that the process was rushed.
This ignores that the part people are calling rushed is the release of Option H.
This was completely expected and the strongest argument they have - which isn’t much.
Engagement isn’t just counting meetings—it’s whether people had a real opportunity to understand, analyze, and impact the outcome.
This is what the state BOE and a court will consider.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grace is speaking. Just recycling all of the talking points we’ve heard from them before.
And then just restates all of the ways MCPS communicated about the Boundary Study as a defense that the process was rushed.
This ignores that the part people are calling rushed is the release of Option H.
This was completely expected and the strongest argument they have - which isn’t much.
Engagement isn’t just counting meetings—it’s whether people had a real opportunity to understand, analyze, and impact the outcome.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Grace is speaking. Just recycling all of the talking points we’ve heard from them before.
And then just restates all of the ways MCPS communicated about the Boundary Study as a defense that the process was rushed.
This ignores that the part people are calling rushed is the release of Option H.
This was completely expected and the strongest argument they have - which isn’t much.
Anonymous wrote:Now Rita is lecturing people and claims anyone who votes against the regional program model is racist.
The magnets were overwhelmingly white and Asian. That’s true. But there is no indication the regional program model will increase Black and Brown enrollment in those programs.
Anonymous wrote:Grace is speaking. Just recycling all of the talking points we’ve heard from them before.
And then just restates all of the ways MCPS communicated about the Boundary Study as a defense that the process was rushed.
This ignores that the part people are calling rushed is the release of Option H.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rita, don’t remind us that we elected you to the board.
If you’re reading this don't like what Montoya has to say, you’re clearly who she was talking to. YOU are part of the problem.
What are you talking about?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Wow. They chickened out. No comments from the board after public comments. And they’re breezing through all of the consent items too.
Okay, the Board annoys me too, but this criticism is silly. The whole point of the consent agenda is that it's a list of things to "breeze through" without discussion. Have you never been to any kind of board meeting before?
Anonymous wrote:Natalie wasted people’s time. Didn’t indicate which way she would vote.
SMOB is supporting Taylor’s recommendation.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Rita, don’t remind us that we elected you to the board.
If you’re reading this don't like what Montoya has to say, you’re clearly who she was talking to. YOU are part of the problem.