Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So disgusting. The strike on little girls school, ages 7-12 years old, is almost certainly the US fault. This seems purposeful. Melania does things for either malice or money, but this seems unusually cruel.

“The first lady’s UN security council speech came days after Iranian media reported an airstrike killed 165 people and injured 96 others at girls’ school”


Excerpt From
“Melania Trump urges protecting children’s education at UN after Iran school strike”
Joseph Gedeon
The Guardian
https://apple.news/AZgAH6V8ASJ6aFrc7cl3fqA
This material may be protected by copyright.

I have no doubt the strike on that school was an Iranian false flag. After all, they were just girls - treated worse than dogs in that culture and totally expendable.

What a stupid and bigoted comment. THose girls were someones' daughters. They were beloved children trying to get an education. Thousands of people have turned out for their funeral today.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/03/03/world/middleeast/iran-school-bombing-children.html
Thousands in Iran Attend Burial of Children Killed in Bombing of School
There were students attending classes at the time that the school was destroyed. Some 175 people were killed by the attack on the girls’ elementary school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So disgusting. The strike on little girls school, ages 7-12 years old, is almost certainly the US fault. This seems purposeful. Melania does things for either malice or money, but this seems unusually cruel.

“The first lady’s UN security council speech came days after Iranian media reported an airstrike killed 165 people and injured 96 others at girls’ school”


Excerpt From
“Melania Trump urges protecting children’s education at UN after Iran school strike”
Joseph Gedeon
The Guardian
https://apple.news/AZgAH6V8ASJ6aFrc7cl3fqA
This material may be protected by copyright.

I have no doubt the strike on that school was an Iranian false flag. After all, they were just girls - treated worse than dogs in that culture and totally expendable.

Ignorant, much? Educational attainment for women in Iran is higher than most the world, 70% of university enrollment.

^^ Speaking of ignorant...

Iran has one of the shortest compulsory education requirements in the world. Children are only obliged to attend school for five years. Even this short period of compulsory education is not entirely enforced by the state, particularly for girls. In instances when girls are married off or boys are forced into labor instead of attending school, the state fails to intervene. The difference is that girls are allowed by the state to be married as young as the age of nine, creating a legal path to deprive them of education.

In Iran, schools are segregated by gender, which makes discrimination against genders easily implementable. Girls are taught only arts and humanities to reinforce the belief that they are physically and cognitively weaker than boys. Boys, in turn, are taught science, technology, math, and sports to bolster the sense that they are stronger, smarter, and the natural heads of their families (Art. 1105). This schooling divide fuels the patriarchal belief that women are weak creatures that must be protected by strong and competent men. Men are given legal tools to exercise this power in the form of civil codes that force families into an unequal hierarchy. The law of Tamkin (submission), for instance, dictates that when a wife refuses to fulfill her marital duties, sexual or otherwise, the husband can withhold her maintenance payments (Article 1108). The husband controls the woman’s movement (Article 1114) and can easily prevent her from having a profession if he feels it is “incompatible with the family interests or the dignity of himself or his wife” (Art. 1117).

Textbooks are an integral part of education as they are the primary avenue through which societal knowledge and expectations are standardized and disseminated. In Iran, textbooks are visually and textually designed to discriminate against girls and enforce inequality in favor of men. A study shows that “discriminatory attitudes” against women and religious and ethnic minorities present in textbooks are not “accidental or sporadic” – the books are a platform for the state to extend its ideological campaign to children. One such ideology is that women’s sole role in society is to get married and to bear offspring, the earlier the better. Recently, pro-child marriage images were added to textbooks, campaigning that “marriage has no age limit, it just has conditions!”

https://gjia.georgetown.edu/2022/04/04/irans-educational-system-and-the-institutionalization-of-gender-inequality/

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So disgusting. The strike on little girls school, ages 7-12 years old, is almost certainly the US fault. This seems purposeful. Melania does things for either malice or money, but this seems unusually cruel.

“The first lady’s UN security council speech came days after Iranian media reported an airstrike killed 165 people and injured 96 others at girls’ school”


Excerpt From
“Melania Trump urges protecting children’s education at UN after Iran school strike”
Joseph Gedeon
The Guardian
https://apple.news/AZgAH6V8ASJ6aFrc7cl3fqA
This material may be protected by copyright.

I have no doubt the strike on that school was an Iranian false flag. After all, they were just girls - treated worse than dogs in that culture and totally expendable.

Ignorant, much? Educational attainment for women in Iran is higher than most the world, 70% of university enrollment.

Anonymous wrote:#occupy democrats
Melania Trump humiliates herself on the world stage by chairing a United Nations Security Council meeting despite a total lack of diplomatic experience.

We've become the laughingstock of the entire world...

After calling the gathering to order with a bang of her gavel, Melania embarked on a string of rambling remarks that were ostensibly about how education is the key to "advancing tolerance and world peace." It was a truly Orwellian moment, coming as it does as her husband embarks on a war of naked aggression against Iran, a war that has already resulted in the bombing of a girls' school that killed at least 165 people.

"My heartfelt condolences to the families who have lost their heroes, who sacrificed their lives for freedom," said Melania, referring to the American troops who have come home in coffins thanks to her husband's pointless and illegal war.

"Their bravery and dedication will always be remembered. I extend my earnest wishes for a swift and smooth recovery to all those who have been injured," she added. "You are in my thoughts and prayers during these challenging times. The U.S. stands with all of the children throughout the world. I hope soon, peace will be yours."

This is an unprecedented appearance by an American First Lady and yet another sign that Donald Trump prizes loyalty and proximity to himself over competence. In fact, this is the first time that the spouse of ANY world leader has been allowed to take the president's seat on the Security Council. It sends a clear signal to the world that the United States is now little more than a nepotistic, tinpot dictatorship.

Your incredibly biased source made me laugh. "Occupy Democrats"? Seriously?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/melania-trump-un-security-council-world-peace-iran/

So disgusting. The strike on little girls school, ages 7-12 years old, is almost certainly the US fault. This seems purposeful. Melania does things for either malice or money, but this seems unusually cruel.

“The first lady’s UN security council speech came days after Iranian media reported an airstrike killed 165 people and injured 96 others at girls’ school”


Excerpt From
“Melania Trump urges protecting children’s education at UN after Iran school strike”
Joseph Gedeon
The Guardian
https://apple.news/AZgAH6V8ASJ6aFrc7cl3fqA
This material may be protected by copyright.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Is she really this out of touch where she gives a speech about protecting children at the exact same moment that her husband is blowing them up? She must really be clueless or is being coerced to do this.

Exactly. And she probably doesn't get it. Obtuse and stupid. Imagine what the attendees are thinking as she tries to promote peace. Good gracious. Crass, stupid and obtuse.

Empty, gaping maw.

Anonymous wrote:Is she really this out of touch where she gives a speech about protecting children at the exact same moment that her husband is blowing them up? She must really be clueless or is being coerced to do this.

Exactly. And she probably doesn't get it. Obtuse and stupid. Imagine what the attendees are thinking as she tries to promote peace. Good gracious. Crass, stupid and obtuse.

It's like when Trump 45 was elected and people said it's OK because his daughter is too hot to let him be evil.