Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How dare they minimize your grit and achievement. I am proud of this team!

No one is minimizing their grit and achievement. If they chose to attend the State of the Union, they would have been celebrated just as much. Also, remember that a reason the men's team has received a lot of media attention is because they haven't won a gold since 1980. Women's has won 3 golds, 4 silvers, and 1 bronze since just 1998.

DP. No they would have been mocked. Republicans hates women’s sports and women in general. We all know Trump would have attacked them.

The US men’s team is just a bunch maga cult member. A true embarrassment to this nation.

You obviously know nothing about Republicans. It’s interesting that liberals accuse conservatives of being divisive when the opposite is true. Republicans are some of the biggest supporters of women’s sports these days. Please don’t make things up just because you’re uninformed.

All you have to do is listen to the Republicans and watch what they do to know you are full of sh#t. Republicans hate women, black, Hispanic etc. Republicans hate western values, the constitution…they hate everything about America.

Please stop spewing lies and propaganda.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Right back to the sexism.

Have you had a TBI?

Everything written above is demonstrably true. Men skate much faster. Everything happens more quickly. It requires a higher level of skill. The game is significantly more violent. Have you not watched hockey?

There isn’t a player on the USA women’s team that could make a men’s college roster at Michigan State or North Dakota.

No one is saying they would.

They are basically different sports at that level. Why is this hard to understand? The same is true of soccer and basketball too, and gymnastics. Maybe swimming is the same, though men's times are generally a little faster.

Anonymous wrote:

Insufferable and deranged.

The men are Trump Patel fans. That is what is insufferable. They invited politics into their Olympic gold medal and here we are.

Looks like they got the better end of the deal.

Imagine being invited to such an event only to have your Cheeto Host feed you gourmet McDonalds! LOL

Insufferable and deranged.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Right back to the sexism.

Have you had a TBI?

Everything written above is demonstrably true. Men skate much faster. Everything happens more quickly. It requires a higher level of skill. The game is significantly more violent. Have you not watched hockey?

There isn’t a player on the USA women’s team that could make a men’s college roster at Michigan State or North Dakota.

I feel sad for you in your little bubble.

Can you explain where I’m wrong. The women on the team would agree with me. Professional athletes are realistic about the disparity.

No one is claiming that The speed of the skating in women's hockey is as fast as the speed of the skating in men's hockey. The women won a gold medal in women's hockey and they're great and they shouldn't have been subjected to a disrespectful joke at their expense by the president of our country.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Right back to the sexism.

Have you had a TBI?

Everything written above is demonstrably true. Men skate much faster. Everything happens more quickly. It requires a higher level of skill. The game is significantly more violent. Have you not watched hockey?

There isn’t a player on the USA women’s team that could make a men’s college roster at Michigan State or North Dakota.

I feel sad for you in your little bubble.

Can you explain where I’m wrong. The women on the team would agree with me. Professional athletes are realistic about the disparity.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Right back to the sexism.

Have you had a TBI?

Everything written above is demonstrably true. Men skate much faster. Everything happens more quickly. It requires a higher level of skill. The game is significantly more violent. Have you not watched hockey?

There isn’t a player on the USA women’s team that could make a men’s college roster at Michigan State or North Dakota.

I feel sad for you in your little bubble.

Anonymous wrote:LOL. Right back to the sexism.

Have you had a TBI?

Everything written above is demonstrably true. Men skate much faster. Everything happens more quickly. It requires a higher level of skill. The game is significantly more violent. Have you not watched hockey?

There isn’t a player on the USA women’s team that could make a men’s college roster at Michigan State or North Dakota.

ERGO, no surprise that MAGA would prefer dominance. They like daddy treading on them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How dare they minimize your grit and achievement. I am proud of this team!

No one is minimizing their grit and achievement. If they chose to attend the State of the Union, they would have been celebrated just as much. Also, remember that a reason the men's team has received a lot of media attention is because they haven't won a gold since 1980. Women's has won 3 golds, 4 silvers, and 1 bronze since just 1998.

So the women, who have to hold other jobs due to low pay, should be celebrated and not just with an afterthought incitation because T thinks he will be impeached.

The men are lame if this was their first medial and they get paid north of $775k per year. The women just recently had their first six-figure salary and have to have other jobs.

Men rewarded for mediocrity as usual.

Perhaps the men should play the women. You know, equal rights and all. Everyone could throw their salaries in escrow and the winner takes all.

Men get paid more because their league generates significantly more revenue.

Are you actually that stupid that you don't realize all the sexist reasons they currently generate more revenue?

Would you list the "sexist reasons?"

No. MAGA should learn to Google and think critically. You always want welfare.

It isn’t real without links. Nice try bot.

Yes. PP doesn't know any "sexist reasons."

Here's one: the men's hockey game is more exciting. Is that sexist? We enjoyed both games at my house, but the men's was definitely much more exciting.

It's just dumb. To center men all the time. To think that women playing the same sport aren't as exciting. But, I guess Americans wanting to be entertained to death shows exactly why bread and circuses work.

I am as pro-women sports as can be. But people are entitled to watch whatever sports they want to watch and if they prefer to watch men's ice hockey then go ahead. There is no requirement for anyone to watch any particular sport.

Why is men's hockey more "exciting" than women's hockey?

Basically every single game. It’s rougher, faster and just more fun to watch.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How dare they minimize your grit and achievement. I am proud of this team!

No one is minimizing their grit and achievement. If they chose to attend the State of the Union, they would have been celebrated just as much. Also, remember that a reason the men's team has received a lot of media attention is because they haven't won a gold since 1980. Women's has won 3 golds, 4 silvers, and 1 bronze since just 1998.

So the women, who have to hold other jobs due to low pay, should be celebrated and not just with an afterthought incitation because T thinks he will be impeached.

The men are lame if this was their first medial and they get paid north of $775k per year. The women just recently had their first six-figure salary and have to have other jobs.

Men rewarded for mediocrity as usual.

Perhaps the men should play the women. You know, equal rights and all. Everyone could throw their salaries in escrow and the winner takes all.

Men get paid more because their league generates significantly more revenue.

Are you actually that stupid that you don't realize all the sexist reasons they currently generate more revenue?

Would you list the "sexist reasons?"

No. MAGA should learn to Google and think critically. You always want welfare.

It isn’t real without links. Nice try bot.

Yes. PP doesn't know any "sexist reasons."

Here's one: the men's hockey game is more exciting. Is that sexist? We enjoyed both games at my house, but the men's was definitely much more exciting.

It's just dumb. To center men all the time. To think that women playing the same sport aren't as exciting. But, I guess Americans wanting to be entertained to death shows exactly why bread and circuses work.

I am as pro-women sports as can be. But people are entitled to watch whatever sports they want to watch and if they prefer to watch men's ice hockey then go ahead. There is no requirement for anyone to watch any particular sport.

You are missing the point from the left wing of the D party: if more people like men’a sports it is unfair, sexist, and misogynist. Laws will need to be passed to make sure men’s sports are given less broadcast time to make it more inclusive and equitable.

A lot of Republican women do not watch women’s sports because there are too many lesbians in it waving their Sodom flag in the face of Americans.

MAGA is really insufferable. But, because you really have no intellectual curiousity or the ability to Google, it is inherently sexist to say that men's hockey is more skillful than women's. There IS sexism involved with the promotion and coverage of women's sports, leading to less interest. And, as you suggested, many men and women in this country hate women. For your edification:

"Women’s hockey, on the other hand, often emphasizes skillful maneuvering and coordinated team play, reflecting a different approach to success on the ice that
focuses on tactical superiority rather than physical dominance."
https://wjarr.com/sites/default/files/WJARR-2024-3709.pdf

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How dare they minimize your grit and achievement. I am proud of this team!

No one is minimizing their grit and achievement. If they chose to attend the State of the Union, they would have been celebrated just as much. Also, remember that a reason the men's team has received a lot of media attention is because they haven't won a gold since 1980. Women's has won 3 golds, 4 silvers, and 1 bronze since just 1998.

So the women, who have to hold other jobs due to low pay, should be celebrated and not just with an afterthought incitation because T thinks he will be impeached.

The men are lame if this was their first medial and they get paid north of $775k per year. The women just recently had their first six-figure salary and have to have other jobs.

Men rewarded for mediocrity as usual.

Perhaps the men should play the women. You know, equal rights and all. Everyone could throw their salaries in escrow and the winner takes all.

Men get paid more because their league generates significantly more revenue.

Are you actually that stupid that you don't realize all the sexist reasons they currently generate more revenue?

Would you list the "sexist reasons?"

No. MAGA should learn to Google and think critically. You always want welfare.

It isn’t real without links. Nice try bot.

Yes. PP doesn't know any "sexist reasons."

Here's one: the men's hockey game is more exciting. Is that sexist? We enjoyed both games at my house, but the men's was definitely much more exciting.

It's just dumb. To center men all the time. To think that women playing the same sport aren't as exciting. But, I guess Americans wanting to be entertained to death shows exactly why bread and circuses work.

I am as pro-women sports as can be. But people are entitled to watch whatever sports they want to watch and if they prefer to watch men's ice hockey then go ahead. There is no requirement for anyone to watch any particular sport.

You are missing the point from the left wing of the D party: if more people like men’a sports it is unfair, sexist, and misogynist. Laws will need to be passed to make sure men’s sports are given less broadcast time to make it more inclusive and equitable.

A lot of Republican women do not watch women’s sports because there are too many lesbians in it waving their Sodom flag in the face of Americans.

You sound like an ignorant and paranoid fool. If you don't want to watch the women's hockey team that's fine. You don't need to spout a lot of negative nonsense about it. Go watch what you want to watch and and find something better to do than post whiny ugly comments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How dare they minimize your grit and achievement. I am proud of this team!

No one is minimizing their grit and achievement. If they chose to attend the State of the Union, they would have been celebrated just as much. Also, remember that a reason the men's team has received a lot of media attention is because they haven't won a gold since 1980. Women's has won 3 golds, 4 silvers, and 1 bronze since just 1998.

So the women, who have to hold other jobs due to low pay, should be celebrated and not just with an afterthought incitation because T thinks he will be impeached.

The men are lame if this was their first medial and they get paid north of $775k per year. The women just recently had their first six-figure salary and have to have other jobs.

Men rewarded for mediocrity as usual.

Perhaps the men should play the women. You know, equal rights and all. Everyone could throw their salaries in escrow and the winner takes all.

Men get paid more because their league generates significantly more revenue.

Are you actually that stupid that you don't realize all the sexist reasons they currently generate more revenue?

Would you list the "sexist reasons?"

No. MAGA should learn to Google and think critically. You always want welfare.

It isn’t real without links. Nice try bot.

Yes. PP doesn't know any "sexist reasons."

Here's one: the men's hockey game is more exciting. Is that sexist? We enjoyed both games at my house, but the men's was definitely much more exciting.

It's just dumb. To center men all the time. To think that women playing the same sport aren't as exciting. But, I guess Americans wanting to be entertained to death shows exactly why bread and circuses work.

I am as pro-women sports as can be. But people are entitled to watch whatever sports they want to watch and if they prefer to watch men's ice hockey then go ahead. There is no requirement for anyone to watch any particular sport.

You are missing the point from the left wing of the D party: if more people like men’a sports it is unfair, sexist, and misogynist. Laws will need to be passed to make sure men’s sports are given less broadcast time to make it more inclusive and equitable.

A lot of Republican women do not watch women’s sports because there are too many lesbians in it waving their Sodom flag in the face of Americans.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How dare they minimize your grit and achievement. I am proud of this team!

No one is minimizing their grit and achievement. If they chose to attend the State of the Union, they would have been celebrated just as much. Also, remember that a reason the men's team has received a lot of media attention is because they haven't won a gold since 1980. Women's has won 3 golds, 4 silvers, and 1 bronze since just 1998.

So the women, who have to hold other jobs due to low pay, should be celebrated and not just with an afterthought incitation because T thinks he will be impeached.

The men are lame if this was their first medial and they get paid north of $775k per year. The women just recently had their first six-figure salary and have to have other jobs.

Men rewarded for mediocrity as usual.

Perhaps the men should play the women. You know, equal rights and all. Everyone could throw their salaries in escrow and the winner takes all.

Men get paid more because their league generates significantly more revenue.

Are you actually that stupid that you don't realize all the sexist reasons they currently generate more revenue?

Would you list the "sexist reasons?"

No. MAGA should learn to Google and think critically. You always want welfare.

It isn’t real without links. Nice try bot.

Yes. PP doesn't know any "sexist reasons."

Here's one: the men's hockey game is more exciting. Is that sexist? We enjoyed both games at my house, but the men's was definitely much more exciting.

It's just dumb. To center men all the time. To think that women playing the same sport aren't as exciting. But, I guess Americans wanting to be entertained to death shows exactly why bread and circuses work.

I am as pro-women sports as can be. But people are entitled to watch whatever sports they want to watch and if they prefer to watch men's ice hockey then go ahead. There is no requirement for anyone to watch any particular sport.

Why is men's hockey more "exciting" than women's hockey?

Faster

More physical

Higher skill level

LOL. Right back to the sexism.