Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play MLS Next AD and HS soccer and stop whining. You knew when you signed up for MLS HD you were foregoing playing for your HS.

We will continue to do both and allow our children to play as much as possible so they improve at a faster rate than others. If there is any punishment, which I strongly doubt, we will deal with it.

Hi volume of poorly coached bad soccer isn't improving anything, except apparently your tolerance and acceptance of low level soccer

As a club coach and former high school coach. I can tell you there is some very good high school boys soccer, not every team. But last years McLean, Westfield and Herndon are beat every MLS next team U17 in the area. And for a young player there can be significant benefit of playing high school. Is every team good, absolutely not. For girls soccer there is no reason for any top girls player to play except maybe the liberty district.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It’s quite obvious that someone’s kid isn’t good enough to score goals on his MLS Next team so he has to stroke his ego by scoring a goal against his crosstown rivals.

He's the Goalie

Anonymous wrote:MLS fines club if your kid plays HS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Play MLS Next AD and HS soccer and stop whining. You knew when you signed up for MLS HD you were foregoing playing for your HS.

We will continue to do both and allow our children to play as much as possible so they improve at a faster rate than others. If there is any punishment, which I strongly doubt, we will deal with it.

Hi volume of poorly coached bad soccer isn't improving anything, except apparently your tolerance and acceptance of low level soccer

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The waiver can be interpreted in many ways. In no situation is the waiver only for private schools.

The waiver is limited to players who fit one of two categories: 1. Received financial aid for high school soccer participation 2. Accepted into a high school based on soccer participation

Please let us know how either of these would apply to a public school.

Anonymous wrote:The waiver can be interpreted in many ways. In no situation is the waiver only for private schools.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:so OP - you came on here to complain about the rules you agreed to when you signed to your club and to brag that you are violating the rules because you don't think you'll be punished. got it.

I just wanted to see everyone's thoughts. Standing up to stupid rules is what makes people change the rules. Not allowing players to play more soccer is why our country will never win a world cup.

if you think violating rules you don't like is how to get people to change rules, you are mistaken. Same goes for complaining about it here.

Fair point. My son has decided to play for HS besides his NVA duties. If he is removed, he’ll join another MLS next club. I put the money down. NVA doesn’t pay my son to play for them.

Anonymous wrote:I’ve read and used the waiver. The waiver does not say that it is for private schools only.

Anonymous wrote:It’s quite obvious that someone’s kid isn’t good enough to score goals on his MLS Next team so he has to stroke his ego by scoring a goal against his crosstown rivals.