Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’re in this situation, or close to it. Overpaid at the PEAK of the market including interest rates. House ended up having significant issues we discovered after the sale that will legally require us to sell as-is unless we spend $200K+ to fix them.
However, we LOVE our location and the lot we’re on is surrounded by new builds. So we’re debating selling at a loss to a developer and move on, teardown + rebuild, or stay for 5-8 years and spruce it up via an interior designer.
Nothing legally requires you to sell as-is but you would need to disclose anything major.
Again also confused about why if you overpaid the move would be to lock in your losses by selling???
PP. The part I didn’t add to my original post because I didn’t want to be obnoxious was our HHI has tripled since we bought (big career move) and is higher than our mortgage by a lot now. So there’s a level of “why are we choosing to deal with this when we don’t have to” too.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’re in this situation, or close to it. Overpaid at the PEAK of the market including interest rates. House ended up having significant issues we discovered after the sale that will legally require us to sell as-is unless we spend $200K+ to fix them.
However, we LOVE our location and the lot we’re on is surrounded by new builds. So we’re debating selling at a loss to a developer and move on, teardown + rebuild, or stay for 5-8 years and spruce it up via an interior designer.
Nothing legally requires you to sell as-is but you would need to disclose anything major.
Again also confused about why if you overpaid the move would be to lock in your losses by selling???
PP. The part I didn’t add to my original post because I didn’t want to be obnoxious was our HHI has tripled since we bought (big career move) and is higher than our mortgage by a lot now. So there’s a level of “why are we choosing to deal with this when we don’t have to” too.
Anonymous wrote:the rules of real estate
location, location, location, schools
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’re in this situation, or close to it. Overpaid at the PEAK of the market including interest rates. House ended up having significant issues we discovered after the sale that will legally require us to sell as-is unless we spend $200K+ to fix them.
However, we LOVE our location and the lot we’re on is surrounded by new builds. So we’re debating selling at a loss to a developer and move on, teardown + rebuild, or stay for 5-8 years and spruce it up via an interior designer.
We are in this situation. How much would you lose if you sell? It could be a wash if you thinking about how much it would cost to fix vs. locking in your loss by selling now.
We are just sucking it up and fixing the problems. 1) the loss, 2) we'd have to pay more for something else in our area, 3) there really isn't anything we like more than our house, which we love everything about except the issues.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:We’re in this situation, or close to it. Overpaid at the PEAK of the market including interest rates. House ended up having significant issues we discovered after the sale that will legally require us to sell as-is unless we spend $200K+ to fix them.
However, we LOVE our location and the lot we’re on is surrounded by new builds. So we’re debating selling at a loss to a developer and move on, teardown + rebuild, or stay for 5-8 years and spruce it up via an interior designer.
Nothing legally requires you to sell as-is but you would need to disclose anything major.
Again also confused about why if you overpaid the move would be to lock in your losses by selling???
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How can it be that bad if so many people where biding on the house and you escalated? Just renovated the house and live through it, sit on the property for 5 years and then sell it if you really must.
Maybe they didn’t use the escalation clause and just overbid? But still seems odd to overpay by $300k - the house wouldn’t appraise, for one thing.