Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

They didn’t arrest him for sex crimes. He was trading national secrets to foreign governments for payouts. He was also giving insider information.

But, yes, we need to step up our investigation and arrest those involved with the sex trafficking.

Sort of like arresting Jimmy Hoffa for tax evasion. Although it would be great if he apologizes to the trafficking victims, implicates Trump, and/or spills on who in the BRF knew what and when.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

So true. I hope this arrest leads to testimony that damns trump. Even if our government wimps out, our children and grandchildren will know the truth.
I admire the British do much for this brave and just move.

Do you even understand why he was arrested??

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It's his birthday today!

Arresting him on his birthday is a nice touch. I only wish Virginia Giuffre had lived to see this day. Yes, I realize he was not arrested for sex crimes but agree with the others, they get you on what they can get you (e.g., Al Capone and tax evasion). US needs to step up!

There's a silver lining in getting him for a different crime, in that the victims don't have to testify. Some victims may want their day in court, but I suspect most just want him locked up and not to be exposed to a global media circus.

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.

We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.

Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.

There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

So true. I hope this arrest leads to testimony that damns trump. Even if our government wimps out, our children and grandchildren will know the truth.
I admire the British do much for this brave and just move.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.  

Reported to Jeff for antisemitism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.  

Reported to Jeff for antisemitism.

What in the world? This is crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.  

Reported to Jeff for antisemitism.

Anonymous wrote:The Epstein files have become bigger than life, people are turning the files into something they want it to be rather than what they are.

We do know Epstein was "recruiting" young women and putting them in positions of availability. But it doesn't mean many of the men's named in the files did anything illegal on their end. It is not illegal to sleep with a woman you met at a party. Most of these women were of legal age. That is why prosecution is so complicated in this area.

Andrew was arrested because he apparently shared government information. That can be prosecuted. Howard Lutnick lying about his association with Epstein is not prosecutable as he didn't lie under oath.

There are also many names in the Epstein files of people who clearly knew him but there is no evidence they actually did anything wrong and their greatest crime is having been friendly with him. That's Lutnick, so far. Or the Clintons. You don't arrest people simply for being known to having been at an Epstein party. Much of the reaction right now reeks more of a sanctimonious vigilante mob and Salem Witch trial mentality. Which is a shame as there were really unethical things Epstein and Maxwell did.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.  

Reported to Jeff for antisemitism.

Anonymous wrote:Extremely telling, no arrests in USA or Israel yet.  

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not a single American arrested before a freaking British royal prince.

What a joke we are here.

They didn’t arrest him for sex crimes. He was trading national secrets to foreign governments for payouts. He was also giving insider information.

But, yes, we need to step up our investigation and arrest those involved with the sex trafficking.

And they never will get him for sex crimes. There are no witnesses coming forward with credible accusations that would withstand a legal challenge. Epstein's emails simply don't have the legal weight you wish they did.