Anonymous wrote:Just got the save the date for a wedding for my BIL's wedding in the midwest. Would you assume "Mr and Mrs Smith" on the envelope means just the couple and no kids? I expect the actual invitation will have more clarity with the RSVP options, but we have a baby who will be a little over a year old at the time of the wedding and I need to feel out child care options with my side of the family as early as possible if he isn't invited.
And yes, DH and I could just ask but that feels annoying. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I'm a little surprised this wedding would be no kids as the couple are both youngest children and all of their siblings have young kids and most live out of state like we do. Feels like a lot of important people will not be able to make and/or have to leave the reception early if no kids are allowed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people that can’t even talk to their siblings?
People who aren’t close to their family at all. Until a wedding happens, then the out of sight out of mind relatives think they are the stars of the show.
DP
Why is relatives-out-of-sight-thinking-they're-stars-of-the-show preventing people from asking relatives direct questions?
Is this like a version of the silent treatment or something? You'd rather waste energy crowdsourcing, avoiding getting a direct answer, because you feel they are inconsiderate but your can't communicate this? If this or some version of this is the case, just don't go.
Anonymous wrote:I would have said just you guys, but I just got a invitation for a wedding this summer that I KNOW my kids are invited to (as the bride and groom were talking to my kids about it recently, and how much fun the kids would have) and it says just my husband and I.
So yeah, you gotta check with someone.
Anonymous wrote:We got a Save the Date for a family wedding addressed to "The Larlo family" but then it says no children on the card. Our kids are 21 16, and 15, so I don't know who is actually invited.
Anonymous wrote:I think you can’t really tell without asking. People aren’t going to address a save the date to a baby.
Anonymous wrote:Just got the save the date for a wedding for my BIL's wedding in the midwest. Would you assume "Mr and Mrs Smith" on the envelope means just the couple and no kids? I expect the actual invitation will have more clarity with the RSVP options, but we have a baby who will be a little over a year old at the time of the wedding and I need to feel out child care options with my side of the family as early as possible if he isn't invited.
And yes, DH and I could just ask but that feels annoying. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I'm a little surprised this wedding would be no kids as the couple are both youngest children and all of their siblings have young kids and most live out of state like we do. Feels like a lot of important people will not be able to make and/or have to leave the reception early if no kids are allowed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people that can’t even talk to their siblings?
People who aren’t close to their family at all. Until a wedding happens, then the out of sight out of mind relatives think they are the stars of the show.
DP
Why is relatives-out-of-sight-thinking-they're-stars-of-the-show preventing people from asking relatives direct questions?
Is this like a version of the silent treatment or something? You'd rather waste energy crowdsourcing, avoiding getting a direct answer, because you feel they are inconsiderate but your can't communicate this? If this or some version of this is the case, just don't go.
Anonymous wrote:Just got the save the date for a wedding for my BIL's wedding in the midwest. Would you assume "Mr and Mrs Smith" on the envelope means just the couple and no kids? I expect the actual invitation will have more clarity with the RSVP options, but we have a baby who will be a little over a year old at the time of the wedding and I need to feel out child care options with my side of the family as early as possible if he isn't invited.
And yes, DH and I could just ask but that feels annoying. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I'm a little surprised this wedding would be no kids as the couple are both youngest children and all of their siblings have young kids and most live out of state like we do. Feels like a lot of important people will not be able to make and/or have to leave the reception early if no kids are allowed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Who are these people that can’t even talk to their siblings?
People who aren’t close to their family at all. Until a wedding happens, then the out of sight out of mind relatives think they are the stars of the show.
Anonymous wrote:Who are these people that can’t even talk to their siblings?
Anonymous wrote:Just got the save the date for a wedding for my BIL's wedding in the midwest. Would you assume "Mr and Mrs Smith" on the envelope means just the couple and no kids? I expect the actual invitation will have more clarity with the RSVP options, but we have a baby who will be a little over a year old at the time of the wedding and I need to feel out child care options with my side of the family as early as possible if he isn't invited.
And yes, DH and I could just ask but that feels annoying. Maybe I'm over thinking it. I'm a little surprised this wedding would be no kids as the couple are both youngest children and all of their siblings have young kids and most live out of state like we do. Feels like a lot of important people will not be able to make and/or have to leave the reception early if no kids are allowed.