Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

So you’d be happy if you could step over dying poor people begging for mercy at the hospital door while on your way to get your TrumpOzwmpic?

DP. That's not how it works. There should be and have in place welfare programs that should go to people in need. Its the determination of who is using that or who should, that has become a problem with uncontrolled immigration. For instance, I know of people who emigrated from another country in late years who used family immigration loopholes like procuring Greencards then going to claim welfare from medicaid, medicare, food stamps, etc. These are not poor people, they could be living in their own country, but chose to come here using the loopholes and then sucking from the systems. They feel very smart about it. There are illegals using such things too. This is where people have a problem.

So your problem is not with illegal immigrants as much as anyone exploiting existing LEGAL loopholes? Do you have the same sort of ire for billionaires and their corporations paying little to nothing in taxes by exploiting tax loopholes? Then why do we not hear a damn thing about taxing the rich, or making sure that large corporations pay their fair share from folks like you, who instead focus on poor people trying to get by with their minimum wage (or lesser) jobs that no one in this country even wants to do?

umm...because the billionaires did something in this country to make those billions instead of sucking off from welfare which these immigrants are coming here to do at late age using loopholes. They never spent a day on their life working here or paying into the system, but come here close to retirement age to then use medicaid, medicare, and food stamps. They know these loopholes exists and thats exactly why they come and use it, same way the asylum loophole and birthright loopholes are used. We should close all these and block all those folks from coming, which is happening now. If only for a short period we are able to correct this bleeding which liberals soon as they get power will do all over again.

Anonymous wrote:They don’t want “happy.” They want everyone miserable like they are.

Anonymous wrote:They don’t want “happy.” They want everyone miserable like they are.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

So you’d be happy if you could step over dying poor people begging for mercy at the hospital door while on your way to get your TrumpOzwmpic?

DP. That's not how it works. There should be and have in place welfare programs that should go to people in need. Its the determination of who is using that or who should, that has become a problem with uncontrolled immigration. For instance, I know of people who emigrated from another country in late years who used family immigration loopholes like procuring Greencards then going to claim welfare from medicaid, medicare, food stamps, etc. These are not poor people, they could be living in their own country, but chose to come here using the loopholes and then sucking from the systems. They feel very smart about it. There are illegals using such things too. This is where people have a problem.

So your problem is not with illegal immigrants as much as anyone exploiting existing LEGAL loopholes? Do you have the same sort of ire for billionaires and their corporations paying little to nothing in taxes by exploiting tax loopholes? Then why do we not hear a damn thing about taxing the rich, or making sure that large corporations pay their fair share from folks like you, who instead focus on poor people trying to get by with their minimum wage (or lesser) jobs that no one in this country even wants to do?

Anonymous wrote:
MAGA and QANON were against the international elite pedo ring when they were hoping to bring down Democrats, but now they're fully supporting the international elite pedo ring since it appears the main perps include Trump and his circle.

I really don't think you need to look beyond that symbol of their moral depravity and relativism.

They would rather abdicate all virtuous principles and suffer economic loss if it means their perceived opponents suffer more than they do. That's what they truly want. Nihilism.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

PP has a serious point, but you can’t answer it with any substance so you come back with the irrelevant name calling, pathetic as usual.

BTW, why don’t you ask Bill Clinton, what was it 17 White House Epstein visits ? What was going on there.

Anonymous wrote:Name something that doesn’t involve bringing others down. We know it makes you happy to “own the libs”, love Trump tearing down the east wing, and laugh at brown people being hunted in the street. I’m not asking about gloating. What is good in your personal life as a result of this regime? Has your grocery store lowered its prices? Did you finally get that promotion a DEI had stolen from you? Are you making so much money now that your wife can quit her job and stay home where she belongs pumping out babies? Is your child no longer gay? Are you paying less for health insurance? How has your life improved?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

Dear MAGA dumb-f**k, here's a pro-tip: a rising tide lifts all boats.

No, it's a zero-sum system. Ds take from those who have, to give to those who don't have, often without rhyme or reason apart from a fundamentally Communist notion that nobody should have any more than anyone else, without regard to merit, effort, or initiative.

Money taken from those who have it sinks them; it doesn't cause them to rise along with those standing there with their hands out.

But I'll bet you're all about being a good little "Christian," while steadfastly refusing to consider those less fortunate than you.

I'm neither Christian, nor a Communist. I believe that people should take personal responsibility for themselves, not looking to others to "raise their boats" for them. "Less fortunate" is all too often simply code for having made bad life choices in education, employment, childbearing, personal financial management, and personal relationships, and/or being lazy, or unmotivated. Nobody else needs to dig them out of holes they have dug for themselves.

Those who suffer unavoidable misfortune through no fault of their own are a different matter, and deserve a base level of support from any civilized society.

What I don't understand from your post is - who gets to decide? What makes you believe you should be making these decisions about other people? What's a "bad life choice" versus a "learning moment?" What about making the best decision you could with the information you had at that time, even if turns out to be wrong? And how do you square making "bad life choices" like childbearing, with the MAGA anti-abortion, oozing toward anti-birth control stance? How do you square with deadbeat dads, leaving women to deal with the entirety of child raising, letting them off scot free, without accountability (this is starting to sound familiar...). How does one make "bad life choices" around education when resources aren't allocated evenly from one school to another, when those with money have very separate and distinct advantages in schooling? What's a kid to do? You seem to want to lump it all with being lazy and unmotivated, etc. because it's so much easier to ascribe it to being a character flaw, and therefore all their fault, when we KNOW you simply can't always dig your way out of those holes. But you seem to see all holes as self-inflicted.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

PP has a serious point, but you can’t answer it with any substance so you come back with the irrelevant name calling, pathetic as usual.

BTW, why don’t you ask Bill Clinton, what was it 17 White House Epstein visits ? What was going on there.

Are you kidding- did you vote for trump because if you did you are not serious in any way and I'm sorry how many times is trump in the files the last I heard it was 38,000 times but I heard that number has increased. Take your fake outrage somewhere else MAGA

Now reported over 1,000,000 times.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

PP has a serious point, but you can’t answer it with any substance so you come back with the irrelevant name calling, pathetic as usual.

BTW, why don’t you ask Bill Clinton, what was it 17 White House Epstein visits ? What was going on there.

Are you kidding- did you vote for trump because if you did you are not serious in any way and I'm sorry how many times is trump in the files the last I heard it was 38,000 times but I heard that number has increased. Take your fake outrage somewhere else MAGA

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Voter ID, strong borders and deportation of border crashers. Immigration completely controlled by who will contribute and not drain resources.

I'm open to uncontrolled borders if all social spending is eliminated in the constitution. When the borders were open in the distant past people sank or swam with zero income redistribution, free hospital services or school. Charity was 100 percent private.

What are your feelings on racism and pedophilia.....just curious.

PP has a serious point, but you can’t answer it with any substance so you come back with the irrelevant name calling, pathetic as usual.

BTW, why don’t you ask Bill Clinton, what was it 17 White House Epstein visits ? What was going on there.