Anonymous wrote:They are notoriously bad at communicating to applicants regarding interviews and the “rubric” is a black box on a good day.
Anonymous wrote:Walls got 1300 applications, are inviting 520 kids for interviews and will accept 150. This is from the ward 3 Ednet zoom with the principals this past week on Tuesday night. That is what the principal of wall said.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Received an email last night (11.13)
11:13pm? We still haven’t gotten one. I assume that means it’s not happening right?
Anonymous wrote:Received an email last night (11.13)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand the reasons that Walls does it how they do, but it still seems a little bit insane that they don’t even consider test scores but they weight recommendations so highly that a 3 out of 4 rating from one teacher takes you out of the running and you won’t even get an interview. I can imagine this system gives them the most compliant students in the district (since teachers will generally highly recommend students who follow directions well), but not necessarily the ones who are most smart and curious.
Teacher who writes a LOT of recommendations here and last year had about 20 kids get interviews for Walls. There seems to be a misconception from parents that if we don’t put the highest score for everything they won’t get an interview. That’s just not true. The highest options have statements like “requests additional work” and that they are always a thoughtful and diligent leader. I had 3 students get interviews last year with middle of the road teacher recommendations from me. I also had students I gave really glowing recommendations for not get an interview.
Hmm. So then what do they go on? The only information they have is the recommendations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand the reasons that Walls does it how they do, but it still seems a little bit insane that they don’t even consider test scores but they weight recommendations so highly that a 3 out of 4 rating from one teacher takes you out of the running and you won’t even get an interview. I can imagine this system gives them the most compliant students in the district (since teachers will generally highly recommend students who follow directions well), but not necessarily the ones who are most smart and curious.
Teacher who writes a LOT of recommendations here and last year had about 20 kids get interviews for Walls. There seems to be a misconception from parents that if we don’t put the highest score for everything they won’t get an interview. That’s just not true. The highest options have statements like “requests additional work” and that they are always a thoughtful and diligent leader. I had 3 students get interviews last year with middle of the road teacher recommendations from me. I also had students I gave really glowing recommendations for not get an interview.
Hmm. So then what do they go on? The only information they have is the recommendations.
They have some formula that quantifies the recommendations and then combines them with GPA. It’s not recommendations only.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand the reasons that Walls does it how they do, but it still seems a little bit insane that they don’t even consider test scores but they weight recommendations so highly that a 3 out of 4 rating from one teacher takes you out of the running and you won’t even get an interview. I can imagine this system gives them the most compliant students in the district (since teachers will generally highly recommend students who follow directions well), but not necessarily the ones who are most smart and curious.
Teacher who writes a LOT of recommendations here and last year had about 20 kids get interviews for Walls. There seems to be a misconception from parents that if we don’t put the highest score for everything they won’t get an interview. That’s just not true. The highest options have statements like “requests additional work” and that they are always a thoughtful and diligent leader. I had 3 students get interviews last year with middle of the road teacher recommendations from me. I also had students I gave really glowing recommendations for not get an interview.
Hmm. So then what do they go on? The only information they have is the recommendations.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I understand the reasons that Walls does it how they do, but it still seems a little bit insane that they don’t even consider test scores but they weight recommendations so highly that a 3 out of 4 rating from one teacher takes you out of the running and you won’t even get an interview. I can imagine this system gives them the most compliant students in the district (since teachers will generally highly recommend students who follow directions well), but not necessarily the ones who are most smart and curious.
Teacher who writes a LOT of recommendations here and last year had about 20 kids get interviews for Walls. There seems to be a misconception from parents that if we don’t put the highest score for everything they won’t get an interview. That’s just not true. The highest options have statements like “requests additional work” and that they are always a thoughtful and diligent leader. I had 3 students get interviews last year with middle of the road teacher recommendations from me. I also had students I gave really glowing recommendations for not get an interview.
Anonymous wrote:I understand the reasons that Walls does it how they do, but it still seems a little bit insane that they don’t even consider test scores but they weight recommendations so highly that a 3 out of 4 rating from one teacher takes you out of the running and you won’t even get an interview. I can imagine this system gives them the most compliant students in the district (since teachers will generally highly recommend students who follow directions well), but not necessarily the ones who are most smart and curious.