Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of quality local girls trying out for AA team who play on top MD and DC teams.
which year?
The year that matters - 2028.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Lots of quality local girls trying out for AA team who play on top MD and DC teams.
which year?
Anonymous wrote:Lots of quality local girls trying out for AA team who play on top MD and DC teams.
Anonymous wrote:Lots of quality local girls trying out for AA team who play on top MD and DC teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No one from a team ranked that low should be on an all star team. Absolute joke. Same with 4 SW girls getting invited, people still see SW as an elite club and they aren’t anymore.
These rankings are from last season just FYI and the 2031 that made this team is now playing for SW, not HG. Regardless of team rankings, it's unfair to insinuate that these girls didn't deserve the invite to the team. Just because a girl plays for a high-ranking team doesn't mean there aren't other girls individually from other teams that don't have the same or better caliber of talent and vice versa.
Anonymous wrote:No one from a team ranked that low should be on an all star team. Absolute joke. Same with 4 SW girls getting invited, people still see SW as an elite club and they aren’t anymore.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny you would say that cause several of the girls from AS Red and Yellow are on the team.
Being that there are only 4 kids taken from the #2 & #3 nationally ranked teams, I think AS will be just fine.
You must think everybody in #2 and #3 ranked team is better than all the players on teams ranked lower. That makes perfect sense!
Good luck at AS tryouts.
Of course not everyone but yeah, I’d imagine the majority of the players on M&D are better than majority on SW or you’d have much different game results wouldn’t you?
You disagree? Is it the refs fault?
The biggest difference is that Top 5 teams usually have more elite players (i.e., future high D1) while the rest of their rosters aren’t very different from other teams.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny you would say that cause several of the girls from AS Red and Yellow are on the team.
Being that there are only 4 kids taken from the #2 & #3 nationally ranked teams, I think AS will be just fine.
You must think everybody in #2 and #3 ranked team is better than all the players on teams ranked lower. That makes perfect sense!
Good luck at AS tryouts.
Of course not everyone but yeah, I’d imagine the majority of the players on M&D are better than majority on SW or you’d have much different game results wouldn’t you?
You disagree? Is it the refs fault?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny you would say that cause several of the girls from AS Red and Yellow are on the team.
Being that there are only 4 kids taken from the #2 & #3 nationally ranked teams, I think AS will be just fine.
You must think everybody in #2 and #3 ranked team is better than all the players on teams ranked lower. That makes perfect sense!
Good luck at AS tryouts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Funny you would say that cause several of the girls from AS Red and Yellow are on the team.
Being that there are only 4 kids taken from the #2 & #3 nationally ranked teams, I think AS will be just fine.
Anonymous wrote:Funny you would say that cause several of the girls from AS Red and Yellow are on the team.