Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They could use it in shaping the class, where most AOs are not involved.Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
What does it mean shaping the class? Who is shaping the class if AOs are not involved?
Shaping the class means using computers to adjust who is in and out to make sure there are enough students in certain categories: boys, rural students, in-state students (at state schools), full-pay students (at schools where that matters), etc.
And majors and special talents/abilities.
these are not all hooks.
Evidence of "academic interest", which is institutional priorities (or undersubscribed), is an important part of class shaping. Perhaps the most overlooked in the discussion here.
It's why CS, Eng, and Business kids can have a horrible RD process while Classics, Middle Eastern Studies, Asian American Lang & Literature, and Jewish Studies can have fabulous RD runs.
You are saying, for undersubscribed majors, it works better in RD than ED?
So ED deferrals could be just that, at least partially, they want to shape the class toward the end of the application season?
Was there a weakness somewhere in the app noticeable in ED?
Are you the OP with a 1580?
Is it an objectively strong, undersubscribed application, with notable/strong in and out of school evidence for major and leadership/impact?
Great LOR that stands on its own?
Objectively strong essays?
Depending on the major (did you check the last page of CDS to see how many/what % of the senior class listed that major), I'd assume you get at least 1 in RD. But it honestly depends on the major and what the university prioritizes.
Class shaping is extremely important in RD.
Unrelated to OP, was asking about the undersubscribed major in relation to ED/RD.
Top of the class, 1500+, average EC related to undersubscribed major, deferred CMC.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Child got a 35 ACT one-and-done in Sept of Junior year (~1540-1550 SAT equivalent). We were told that checks a box/jumps a hurdle at every school. We were cautioned that it's a great score and helpful in the scheme of things, but guarantees nothing in the end.
us too, and kid refused to take again because college counselor told him the same.
Anonymous wrote:Child got a 35 ACT one-and-done in Sept of Junior year (~1540-1550 SAT equivalent). We were told that checks a box/jumps a hurdle at every school. We were cautioned that it's a great score and helpful in the scheme of things, but guarantees nothing in the end.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They could use it in shaping the class, where most AOs are not involved.Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
What does it mean shaping the class? Who is shaping the class if AOs are not involved?
Shaping the class means using computers to adjust who is in and out to make sure there are enough students in certain categories: boys, rural students, in-state students (at state schools), full-pay students (at schools where that matters), etc.
And majors and special talents/abilities.
these are not all hooks.
Evidence of "academic interest", which is institutional priorities (or undersubscribed), is an important part of class shaping. Perhaps the most overlooked in the discussion here.
It's why CS, Eng, and Business kids can have a horrible RD process while Classics, Middle Eastern Studies, Asian American Lang & Literature, and Jewish Studies can have fabulous RD runs.
You are saying, for undersubscribed majors, it works better in RD than ED?
So ED deferrals could be just that, at least partially, they want to shape the class toward the end of the application season?
Was there a weakness somewhere in the app noticeable in ED?
Are you the OP with a 1580?
Is it an objectively strong, undersubscribed application, with notable/strong in and out of school evidence for major and leadership/impact?
Great LOR that stands on its own?
Objectively strong essays?
Depending on the major (did you check the last page of CDS to see how many/what % of the senior class listed that major), I'd assume you get at least 1 in RD. But it honestly depends on the major and what the university prioritizes.
Class shaping is extremely important in RD.
Anonymous wrote:Other than schools like Caltech?
I have looked at our Naviance, I don’t see a pattern where high test scores help admissions. There is always a healthy distribution of test scores for top schools.
Someone mentioned in the other thread that they help in Michigan admissions. What is your observation at your school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They could use it in shaping the class, where most AOs are not involved.Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
What does it mean shaping the class? Who is shaping the class if AOs are not involved?
Shaping the class means using computers to adjust who is in and out to make sure there are enough students in certain categories: boys, rural students, in-state students (at state schools), full-pay students (at schools where that matters), etc.
And majors and special talents/abilities.
these are not all hooks.
Evidence of "academic interest", which is institutional priorities (or undersubscribed), is an important part of class shaping. Perhaps the most overlooked in the discussion here.
It's why CS, Eng, and Business kids can have a horrible RD process while Classics, Middle Eastern Studies, Asian American Lang & Literature, and Jewish Studies can have fabulous RD runs.
You are saying, for undersubscribed majors, it works better in RD than ED?
So ED deferrals could be just that, at least partially, they want to shape the class toward the end of the application season?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
We were told differently by a former AO at an Ivy (1550 plus treated differently) so may depend on the school. Anecdotally, the kid with the 1600 and cum laude from our private did very well among T10 schools.
Look at the Harvard lawsuit. The scoring shows 33-36 was treated the same (!!!!)
It was all of the other factors that matter. And matter A LOT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They could use it in shaping the class, where most AOs are not involved.Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
What does it mean shaping the class? Who is shaping the class if AOs are not involved?
Shaping the class means using computers to adjust who is in and out to make sure there are enough students in certain categories: boys, rural students, in-state students (at state schools), full-pay students (at schools where that matters), etc.
And majors and special talents/abilities.
these are not all hooks.
Evidence of "academic interest", which is institutional priorities (or undersubscribed), is an important part of class shaping. Perhaps the most overlooked in the discussion here.
It's why CS, Eng, and Business kids can have a horrible RD process while Classics, Middle Eastern Studies, Asian American Lang & Literature, and Jewish Studies can have fabulous RD runs.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They could use it in shaping the class, where most AOs are not involved.Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
What does it mean shaping the class? Who is shaping the class if AOs are not involved?
Shaping the class means using computers to adjust who is in and out to make sure there are enough students in certain categories: boys, rural students, in-state students (at state schools), full-pay students (at schools where that matters), etc.
And majors and special talents/abilities.
these are not all hooks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Our school counselor gaslit my high score DC, basically told DC their high score is treated the same as 1500. Counselor was an AO at an ivy. So I guess it’s not helpful.
We were told differently by a former AO at an Ivy (1550 plus treated differently) so may depend on the school. Anecdotally, the kid with the 1600 and cum laude from our private did very well among T10 schools.