Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

Oh wow thanks for this. I’ve been dying to front as someone who can’t read an entire book and a “set” called the “Emmalynn” ought to do it.
I understand why there are threads periodically where women buy garbage marketed on Instagram and then don’t get why the clothes look like garbage. Jesus.

What in the internalized misogyny ...

Idiot.

I'm guessing you don't understand the word "misogyny" very well. Or you just can't defend yourself with anything beyond ad hominem ... because you are an "idiot."

Oh, I’d love to talk theory with you. You’re a little Altard-ed for me, though. Can you provide more links for poly blend stretch shit to feed the shopping addictions celebrated as beauty and fashion here?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

Oh wow thanks for this. I’ve been dying to front as someone who can’t read an entire book and a “set” called the “Emmalynn” ought to do it.
I understand why there are threads periodically where women buy garbage marketed on Instagram and then don’t get why the clothes look like garbage. Jesus.

What in the internalized misogyny ...

Idiot.

I'm guessing you don't understand the word "misogyny" very well. Or you just can't defend yourself with anything beyond ad hominem ... because you are an "idiot."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

Oh wow thanks for this. I’ve been dying to front as someone who can’t read an entire book and a “set” called the “Emmalynn” ought to do it.
I understand why there are threads periodically where women buy garbage marketed on Instagram and then don’t get why the clothes look like garbage. Jesus.

What in the internalized misogyny ...

Idiot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

Oh wow thanks for this. I’ve been dying to front as someone who can’t read an entire book and a “set” called the “Emmalynn” ought to do it.
I understand why there are threads periodically where women buy garbage marketed on Instagram and then don’t get why the clothes look like garbage. Jesus.

What in the internalized misogyny ...

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

Oh wow thanks for this. I’ve been dying to front as someone who can’t read an entire book and a “set” called the “Emmalynn” ought to do it.
I understand why there are threads periodically where women buy garbage marketed on Instagram and then don’t get why the clothes look like garbage. Jesus.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Matching sets of WHAT? Pajamas?

Sweatsuits, I think that's obviou from the replies.

Not necessarily. "Sets" are a big Gen Z thing, where clothing is sold as a set rather in individual pieces, and it's not limited to athleisure.

Like this Reformation outfit is sold as a two-piece set.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

But when OP says "Spanx Air Essentials" and "Varley" then yeah, they do.

Spanx has this bizarre line of work wear, so we would have to google "spanx air essentials" to know what kind of set op is looking for. Could be one of their workwear sets. I have no idea what varley is. I just googled it and it looks like 45 year old suburban mom, so i'm happy to not know. I don't live in DC anymore. Rich leisure moms where i live are not wearing that ugly stuff. Teens are wearing non-sets of sweats with crop tops.

Anonymous wrote:This must be an extremely suburban look. I live in NYC and don’t see anyone wearing “sets.” Maybe a few years ago.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:To the grammar police: matching sets is how they are referred to by retailers. I think the idea is that matching sets are what you make them. Perhaps a bit more pulled together than athleisure because they are designed for lifestyle rather than the gym.

Re: the other comments, I have found them to be a step above the sweats that others describe. Higher level brands exhibit good fit, flattering cuts - I do not feel like I’m wearing something that belongs on Gen Z.

I don’t know what you’re talking about. “Matching sets” of various things have been trending since around Covid. I just googled “matching sets” and all the first page of hits were from well known clothing brands, with links to all of their “matching sets” of a variety of different things - linen top and shorts, bike shorts and sports bras, suits, etc etc. Matching sets does not, without a qualifier, mean sweats.

I would love to link to the emails that I get but retailers do literally call them "matching sets". Look at the links here:

Top right: matching sets -- https://spanx.com/collections/airessentials?collection_cursor=eyJvZmZzZXQiOjR9&collection_direction=next
Top header: matching sets -- https://vuoriclothing.com/collections/matching-sets
This entire article -- https://themomedit.com/the-best-matching-sets-women/

Yes, but trendy retailers are also describing all of the following as "matching sets" -- and none of them have anything to do sweats. The point is that "matching sets" can mean anything that matches, including sweats sets. So yes, when i go to vouri and search for their matching sets, it's going to be sweats. But when i'm on anthro looking at matching sets, it's not going to be sweats. So saying "matching sets" is shorthand for "sweats matching sets" is wrong.

fwiw these are the top five google hits I got when i searched "matching sets". On first glance, only aritzia and BR had a lot of sweat suit options (mixed in with a lot of other non-sweats options too).

https://www.abercrombie.com/shop/us/womens-matching-sets-dresses-and-rompers

https://www.aritzia.com/us/en/clothing/two-piece-sets

https://www.altardstate.com/as/clothing/matching-sets/

https://www.revolve.com/content/products/editorial?prettyPath=/r/Editorials.jsp&listname=Matching%20Sets&cplid=1395&nav=mob_mostwanted&navsrc=main

https://bananarepublicfactory.gapfactory.com/browse/women/matching-sets?cid=1179957

I'm probably not the target audience, but every one of those A&F sets is awful.

And I never see anyone where I live/in my circles in any kind of matching set. Not a linen vest and shorts. Not a sweatsuit. None of it. No teens, no moms, maaaaaaybe little girls.

Oh man, this ALL that the teen girls around me wear to school/practice/etc. Cute matching wide leg sweat pants and quarter zips or sweatshirts. It's like the teen girl uniform in Northern Virginia.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How are you guys wearing these without looking sloppy? I have a couple really cute pairs from great brands (Spanx Air Essentials & Varley) but I just feel like I'm wearing sweats and don't really want to go somewhere looking like I'm wearing a sweatsuit. What are you doing to pull these together and look polished? Yes, I do my hair and wear makeup, but it still just looks like I'm wearing a $250 sweatsuit.

FWIW, weight matters here, unfortunately. Most of us who are overweight look sloppy in these kinds of outfits no matter what. They look good on women who are very fit and put together all the time.

OP here, I have a great body, but maybe it's because I'm 5'4". Are these meant for people that are like 5'7"?

Anonymous wrote:This must be an extremely suburban look. I live in NYC and don’t see anyone wearing “sets.” Maybe a few years ago.