Anonymous wrote:Just look at any given club soccer team, the kids in small privates are less social with the entire team. The kids open to bonding with others are often diverse public school goers. I have seen that and adult versions of that looking at college interns. Deny it all you want but it happens and it does not negate the positives of private so don't be upset or call it cope when drawbacks exist. Get out in the world and notice things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It did make it easier for me to deal with different people. But also made it harder for me to launch my career as I wasn’t as polished as people that went to private schools. I am doing exceptionally well now but I am in my 50s.
FWIW - I went to an Ivy League school. I send my kids to private as I don’t want them to have to battle as hard as I did.
I cam from a LMC background and definitely was a square peg at the Ivy I attended. I get along with anyone and can make small talk about anything (well except sports because unless you follow it closely you quickly get left behind), but hardscrabble roots and ignorance definitely hurt me in my career progress.
That said a DC high performing public and private school are largely indistinguishable for your kids; its pretty unlikely they will be hanging out with the kids smoking under the bleachers.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Curious to see if people feel it did.
It's a cope public schoolers tell themselves. Total nonsense. And frankly, who the heck even cares about "easily working with people from different backgrounds"? What does that even mean? Nearly all white collar professionals have a very narrow social orbit.
Anonymous wrote:It did make it easier for me to deal with different people. But also made it harder for me to launch my career as I wasn’t as polished as people that went to private schools. I am doing exceptionally well now but I am in my 50s.
FWIW - I went to an Ivy League school. I send my kids to private as I don’t want them to have to battle as hard as I did.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who assume urban schools will make it easier for you to work more easily with a range of people ignore most urban schools are not really diverse places. They are filled with poorer kids who have very little exposure to genuine socio economic diversity. Your average suburban high school will have greater diversity.
But in terms of really intermingling all classes, nothing can beat a small town high school where all kids go to the same one high school, whether the doctors' kids or trailer park kids.
As for the thread topic, there are too many nuances to public and private schools. Your typical urban school is as much a bubble as a rich private school, just in a different way.
Nah, small towns don't prepare you for the big city.
You can say the same about big cities failing to teach people how to cope in different environments.
dp but most jobs are not in rural areas; they are in cities.
But in cities the doctors' kids and the public housing kids don't attend the same schools. Lots of jobs just means there's enough people to be broken up into different SES communities.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it depends if people grew up in a city or suburb...not private vs. public. Example...an inner city Catholic School is going to be much more diverse than many suburban public school.
Exactly. My DS went to a public elementary in MoCo before he switched to private and everyone was middle to upper class and mostly white. just like his private school.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t think one can really know this because one doesn’t know what it would be like to grow up in a private.
That said, I went to a private school until I was in sixth grade. I entered public school at seventh grade and it was a whole other world. was definitely sheltered in private school. I can’t imagine being that sheltered until college or after.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People who assume urban schools will make it easier for you to work more easily with a range of people ignore most urban schools are not really diverse places. They are filled with poorer kids who have very little exposure to genuine socio economic diversity. Your average suburban high school will have greater diversity.
But in terms of really intermingling all classes, nothing can beat a small town high school where all kids go to the same one high school, whether the doctors' kids or trailer park kids.
As for the thread topic, there are too many nuances to public and private schools. Your typical urban school is as much a bubble as a rich private school, just in a different way.
Nah, small towns don't prepare you for the big city.
You can say the same about big cities failing to teach people how to cope in different environments.
dp but most jobs are not in rural areas; they are in cities.