Anonymous wrote:For Arlington it appears at the younger age groups they are separating based on date of birth (Aug-July) and for the HS age groups they are also taking into consideration Grade. So August and Sept kids who didn't "reclassify" are going to scrimmage with the older age group at least for the first scrimmage.
Anonymous wrote:For Arlington it appears at the younger age groups they are separating based on date of birth (Aug-July) and for the HS age groups they are also taking into consideration Grade. So August and Sept kids who didn't "reclassify" are going to scrimmage with the older age group at least for the first scrimmage.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My kid is a Q4 birthday and made the u13 ECNL/GA team for the older SY team (e.g. playing up, when they could play u12 again). Our DC will be playing a SY up since they'll be 1. a starter and 2. playing against better competition at every practice. Since 9v9 play only happens once a week at games, I don't buy the small vs big field argument. My kid plays well on 11v11, though I could see some kids benefitting from a confidence boost by staying at their SY if they have superior technical skills. 11v11 is different game from 9v9 and some kids that excel at 9v9 don't excel at 11v11 and vice versa. My kid plays better at 11v11, so I have no concerns missing out on an extra chance at 9v9.
This is interesting insight. Do you mind providing more insight on what you're of players may excel more when they move to 11v11 over 9v9? And vice versa?
Anonymous wrote:My kid is a Q4 birthday and made the u13 ECNL/GA team for the older SY team (e.g. playing up, when they could play u12 again). Our DC will be playing a SY up since they'll be 1. a starter and 2. playing against better competition at every practice. Since 9v9 play only happens once a week at games, I don't buy the small vs big field argument. My kid plays well on 11v11, though I could see some kids benefitting from a confidence boost by staying at their SY if they have superior technical skills. 11v11 is different game from 9v9 and some kids that excel at 9v9 don't excel at 11v11 and vice versa. My kid plays better at 11v11, so I have no concerns missing out on an extra chance at 9v9.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington has not done these scrimmages before this year. And, I doubt kids were scrimmaging across age groups much, if at all, before.
In the past, one age group’s coaches knew how each kid played and was improving over the course of the year, but not how they compared to kids a year older or a year younger. Now, they have to try to determine that and slot kids into teams accordingly.
Anonymous wrote:Arlington is doing age group scrimmages. Starting with the same level (ie the ECNL teams are playing older/younger ECNL teams, red team is playing the older/younger red teams, and on down the line) playing together and seeing how that goes. Surprised that was the choice as most of the coaches seem to think the older group will move up at least one level, but we were told that’s just the starting point, and the next scrimmage could be different.
There was always a decent amount of movement on teams; this year there will be a lot more.
Anonymous wrote:In most leagues this will be a huge reshuffle but a one and done. We are however in a MLSN club and on the AD team, which is a whole mess with us going to SY and the HD staying BY.
Either would have been fine, staying BY for AD or switching to SY for both. The split spoils the draw of AD as a feeder (at least theoretically) to HD for Q3/Q4 kids. The illusion as it were is killed, and that might damage the league's ability to recruit competitively in the future.
For us specifically, we were annoyed, talked it over, and we agreed that neither the commitment nor the drive is there for our family to pursue HD or ECNL NL. We like the club enough to just stick around and switch to the younger team next year. It did take a bit to sink in and we looked around at the huge range of different options before deciding to roll with it.
Anonymous wrote:Aug and Sept. a lot of states Oct 1 is cut off for school gradesAnonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are you starting a new thread when you aready have one and then saying you will report anyone who doesn't support what you are saying? Why the drama?
There is no agreeing/disagreeing - if you want to talk about Aug players go there. This about how clubs and families are being impacted in every other scenario.
Again if you take August players out of the mix changing from BY to SY is no big deal.
The only players impacted will be HS level who are in the college recruitment phase.
I guess people might have issues with Jersey numbers. But clubs will use this an an opportunity for them to make more $$$ forcing everyone to buy a new kit.