Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

Nope, wrong again. I am Caucasian, UMC. When I was at MIT, we used to wear a T-shirt that said SPAMIT on it. Do you know what that means? SPAMIT = Stupid People at MIT. Self-deprecating. Perhaps not a word that you understand.

That other post is a moron. Ignore him. Waste of life that is insecure he couldn't make something of himself or get any of these schools being discussed.

You are right. Should remember the Bernard Shaw quote, “Never wrestle with a pig. You both get dirty, and the pig likes it."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

When you are dumb af, you start pretending other people's credentials don't exist. Stanford alum here from Maryland and we also don't look down on schools just because of admissions process. Chicago and Hopkins are well respected. Maybe one day you can actually get in and not be an insecure tourist at CoHo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

Nope, wrong again. I am Caucasian, UMC. When I was at MIT, we used to wear a T-shirt that said SPAMIT on it. Do you know what that means? SPAMIT = Stupid People at MIT. Self-deprecating. Perhaps not a word that you understand.

White people are part of DEI at MIT. So I was not wrong. But I doubt you really went cuz even DEI should sound smarter than you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

Nope, wrong again. I am Caucasian, UMC. When I was at MIT, we used to wear a T-shirt that said SPAMIT on it. Do you know what that means? SPAMIT = Stupid People at MIT. Self-deprecating. Perhaps not a word that you understand.

That other post is a moron. Ignore him. Waste of life that is insecure he couldn't make something of himself or get any of these schools being discussed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless, Rice offers ED2 to lock in some of these very top students.

That’s a fallacy. Very top students don’t do ED2.

Wrong. The valedictorian at DC’s school is doing ED2 (not another school, not Rice).

It only that particular hs sucks.

Nope. A top private. Other kids are going Yale, MIT, Brown, Cornell, Duke, UPenn, etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

Nope, wrong again. I am Caucasian, UMC. When I was at MIT, we used to wear a T-shirt that said SPAMIT on it. Do you know what that means? SPAMIT = Stupid People at MIT. Self-deprecating. Perhaps not a word that you understand.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

My DD’s friend got spooked from ED1. Got into JHU in ED 2, but not great for her socially.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless, Rice offers ED2 to lock in some of these very top students.

That’s a fallacy. Very top students don’t do ED2.

Wrong. The valedictorian at DC’s school is doing ED2 (not another school, not Rice).

It only that particular hs sucks.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

You can claim whatever you want. You don’t sound smart enough for MIT. Maybe a DEI product?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

You are the true definition for brain full of shit.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless, Rice offers ED2 to lock in some of these very top students.

That’s a fallacy. Very top students don’t do ED2.

Are you stupid?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

I actually went to MIT and find the above statement moronic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The schools who offer ED2 are the ones who would lose in cross-admits to higher rank schools. This includes UChicago, JHU, and Rice.

Duke was mentioned as TO but I believe it’s mostly for athletes and development admits. Most students there actually have very high test scores.

You are substituting popularity for top quality. Not a pageant.
Rice only loses to HYPMS because their admits are at the level.

DP but OMG! This is a crazy claim! DCUM parents are really delusional.

It’s true. Rice admits’ stats are higher than most ivies.

What stats? College admissions isn’t just about GPAs or SAT scores. There’re whole lot more dimensions to measure talent.

Come on. You might need a spike for HYPMS. Outside T5, no. Every one has a construction job or federal judge internship. T20s are mostly about stats.

you need a spike for most schools. most top 15 are sub 6% acceptance rate - so wtf are you talking about?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Top schools don’t do ES2. Just saying…

Disagree. Chicago and JHU both have ED2. Top 10.

They’re not true top schools.

What’s a true top school

Ivies, MIT, Stanford, Caltech etc, those that are confident enough not to play the ED game or at least not the ED2 game.

By your standard, USC gets to top Rice?
Get a life!

Not the only criterion. Regardless, ED2 schools aren’t top schools. So stop pretending.

It appears that you are using an only criterion here.

I would choose Rice over most of ivies outside HYP. You would too if you are not using a single criterion and be honest.

It’s quite simple. If a school is really top, why do they even need to use ED 2? Ask yourself that!
Look at MIT, no ED, not even REA. That’s the true definition of a top school.

you sound like someone who didnt go to MIT but kiss their ass which is pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Regardless, Rice offers ED2 to lock in some of these very top students.

That’s a fallacy. Very top students don’t do ED2.

Wrong. The valedictorian at DC’s school is doing ED2 (not another school, not Rice).