Anonymous wrote:Why do we (MCPS parents) feel the need to defend the school system? Does being "anti-MCPS" mean acknowledging politicians' and administrators' inability to stop the decline of the schools, and then holding them to account for that failure? If so, I guess I'm "anti-MCPS." We should be battering the incompetent school administrators to either improve or organize to break this organization up into manageable entities. I guess that parents feel like because their kids are in the system, they have to pretend it's good, for their own sanity and perhaps to collectively hold up the reputation until their kids are out. I think this is a self-defeating strategy. MCPS parents should be raising h*** with the Board and the professional administrators. We live in a democracy. This is our job.

Anonymous wrote:As a teacher and a parent of two in MCPS, I am generally happy with MCPS. I do think we provided a better product 20 years ago, but I'd say that's a national trend rather than a local. I do believe there is some correction going on that's going to take time to shake out. Someone mentioned how many parents are happy with their teachers, but would like to see more educational rigor and accountability for their children. I'd say that's accurate for the teachers too. But there are a lot of policies put in place over the last decade that have to be undone. Still, my experience is that there are good teachers teaching good students.
Of course, the biggest factor to your child's education success is you. Keeping them exposed to reading, music, physical activity, and limiting their use of screens (especially at an early age) is going to do so much more for their educational outcomes than any policy from central office.

Anonymous wrote:I am an avid reader of this forum as I try to figure out where to send our kids to school for kindergarten.

But reading these threads are really starting to seriously worry me.

Our neighborhood is about 50/50 public private. Nearly all the public parents are happy with their kids’ ES and HS experiences (mixed on MS), and all the private parents are happy with their kids’ schools, too.

Are the public school parents in my neighborhood just settling, or is this forum wildly anti-public school and not reflective of how most people feel about MCPS?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an avid reader of this forum as I try to figure out where to send our kids to school for kindergarten.

But reading these threads are really starting to seriously worry me.

Our neighborhood is about 50/50 public private. Nearly all the public parents are happy with their kids’ ES and HS experiences (mixed on MS), and all the private parents are happy with their kids’ schools, too.

Are the public school parents in my neighborhood just settling, or is this forum wildly anti-public school and not reflective of how most people feel about MCPS?

While this forum can be extra, I actually disagree that it’s anti-public school. From my experience, there are a lot of legitimate complaints voiced here. However, if you’re in a neighborhood where half of families send their kids to private, you’ll probably be fine because your public school demographics will reflect the benefits of high household incomes.

My child is in upper elementary that is a step right below Title I (focus school, I think?). The teachers have been caring and the school administration seems responsive and organized, but it’s clear that more resources are needed to support all students and different needs. Many students are not on grade level. On the other end, my kid is regularly bored with reading in class, but I don’t think the school has the capacity to differentiate and has to stick to the provided curriculum.

Meanwhile the central administration has spent the whole academic year talking about this regional plan (which in my opinion, favors the already successful, resourced high schools) without a peep about how to address gaps and be more innovative in earlier grades, where an academic foundation is built.

I’m happy with my kid’s education 50-75% of the time but hoping to expand our options in the future.

It is definitely anti-MCPS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an avid reader of this forum as I try to figure out where to send our kids to school for kindergarten.

But reading these threads are really starting to seriously worry me.

Our neighborhood is about 50/50 public private. Nearly all the public parents are happy with their kids’ ES and HS experiences (mixed on MS), and all the private parents are happy with their kids’ schools, too.

Are the public school parents in my neighborhood just settling, or is this forum wildly anti-public school and not reflective of how most people feel about MCPS?

While this forum can be extra, I actually disagree that it’s anti-public school. From my experience, there are a lot of legitimate complaints voiced here. However, if you’re in a neighborhood where half of families send their kids to private, you’ll probably be fine because your public school demographics will reflect the benefits of high household incomes.

My child is in upper elementary that is a step right below Title I (focus school, I think?). The teachers have been caring and the school administration seems responsive and organized, but it’s clear that more resources are needed to support all students and different needs. Many students are not on grade level. On the other end, my kid is regularly bored with reading in class, but I don’t think the school has the capacity to differentiate and has to stick to the provided curriculum.

Meanwhile the central administration has spent the whole academic year talking about this regional plan (which in my opinion, favors the already successful, resourced high schools) without a peep about how to address gaps and be more innovative in earlier grades, where an academic foundation is built.

I’m happy with my kid’s education 50-75% of the time but hoping to expand our options in the future.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an avid reader of this forum as I try to figure out where to send our kids to school for kindergarten.

But reading these threads are really starting to seriously worry me.

Our neighborhood is about 50/50 public private. Nearly all the public parents are happy with their kids’ ES and HS experiences (mixed on MS), and all the private parents are happy with their kids’ schools, too.

Are the public school parents in my neighborhood just settling, or is this forum wildly anti-public school and not reflective of how most people feel about MCPS?

While this forum can be extra, I actually disagree that it’s anti-public school. From my experience, there are a lot of legitimate complaints voiced here. However, if you’re in a neighborhood where half of families send their kids to private, you’ll probably be fine because your public school demographics will reflect the benefits of high household incomes.

My child is in upper elementary that is a step right below Title I (focus school, I think?). The teachers have been caring and the school administration seems responsive and organized, but it’s clear that more resources are needed to support all students and different needs. Many students are not on grade level. On the other end, my kid is regularly bored with reading in class, but I don’t think the school has the capacity to differentiate and has to stick to the provided curriculum.

Meanwhile the central administration has spent the whole academic year talking about this regional plan (which in my opinion, favors the already successful, resourced high schools) without a peep about how to address gaps and be more innovative in earlier grades, where an academic foundation is built.

I’m happy with my kid’s education 50-75% of the time but hoping to expand our options in the future.

It is definitely anti-MCPS

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do the half of the neighborhood that send their kids to private school do so because it's just part of the lifestyle (ie it's a richer area and a normal thing for them) or do they do so because they don't like the local schools?

At one point to a certain degree, I think everyone is happy at their local schools and appreciate the teacher and staff at their schools. I do think a lot of it is that they don't know what they don't know. ie some differences in how schools do things and offer.

Although more recently I do hear some people point out (when we talk to each other in person) issues with their school.

I think one of the key things is that with the MCPS schools that our kids go/went to you really have to stay on top of things and make sure to advocate for your kids. Otherwise MCPS will automatically try to default things by denying additional services or other paths for your kids. In some ways looking back, this has always been the case even when we were in school. In our point of view, if you just leave things in MCPS's hands, your kid might move through the grades and graduate but I'm not sure if your child would be at a level that you're okay with. We do know some families where they have no issues with it.

If our family was just starting out school now, I would most likely look elsewhere outside of Montgomery County. But a lot of it is due to Montgomery County in general and what you're getting for for the money. If we were staying in the same home/place and contemplating between our local MCPS school and private school, we'd probably be inclined to stick with the local public school. Although being in one of the areas potentially affected by the proposed boundary changes, private school has crossed my mind recently. For public vs private, a lot of it would depend on what are your local schools.

My neighborhood is maybe 75% MCPS. Of the private school parents I speak to, none of them are doing it for lifestyle. It’s all because MCPS is subpar.

For us, we have a high IQ kid with dyslexia and ADHD. We spoke with her neuropsychologist and an MCPS special Ed professional. Both urged private school. We’ve been very happy but wish we could’ve made public school work.

Wow, it surprised me that MCPS SPED staffer would urge private. That sounds disturbing and possibly illegal … they aren’t allowed to sough off their responsibility to provide services.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Do the half of the neighborhood that send their kids to private school do so because it's just part of the lifestyle (ie it's a richer area and a normal thing for them) or do they do so because they don't like the local schools?

At one point to a certain degree, I think everyone is happy at their local schools and appreciate the teacher and staff at their schools. I do think a lot of it is that they don't know what they don't know. ie some differences in how schools do things and offer.

Although more recently I do hear some people point out (when we talk to each other in person) issues with their school.

I think one of the key things is that with the MCPS schools that our kids go/went to you really have to stay on top of things and make sure to advocate for your kids. Otherwise MCPS will automatically try to default things by denying additional services or other paths for your kids. In some ways looking back, this has always been the case even when we were in school. In our point of view, if you just leave things in MCPS's hands, your kid might move through the grades and graduate but I'm not sure if your child would be at a level that you're okay with. We do know some families where they have no issues with it.

If our family was just starting out school now, I would most likely look elsewhere outside of Montgomery County. But a lot of it is due to Montgomery County in general and what you're getting for for the money. If we were staying in the same home/place and contemplating between our local MCPS school and private school, we'd probably be inclined to stick with the local public school. Although being in one of the areas potentially affected by the proposed boundary changes, private school has crossed my mind recently. For public vs private, a lot of it would depend on what are your local schools.

My neighborhood is maybe 75% MCPS. Of the private school parents I speak to, none of them are doing it for lifestyle. It’s all because MCPS is subpar.

For us, we have a high IQ kid with dyslexia and ADHD. We spoke with her neuropsychologist and an MCPS special Ed professional. Both urged private school. We’ve been very happy but wish we could’ve made public school work.

Wow, it surprised me that MCPS SPED staffer would urge private. That sounds disturbing and possibly illegal … they aren’t allowed to sough off their responsibility to provide services.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I am an avid reader of this forum as I try to figure out where to send our kids to school for kindergarten.

But reading these threads are really starting to seriously worry me.

Our neighborhood is about 50/50 public private. Nearly all the public parents are happy with their kids’ ES and HS experiences (mixed on MS), and all the private parents are happy with their kids’ schools, too.

Are the public school parents in my neighborhood just settling, or is this forum wildly anti-public school and not reflective of how most people feel about MCPS?

While this forum can be extra, I actually disagree that it’s anti-public school. From my experience, there are a lot of legitimate complaints voiced here. However, if you’re in a neighborhood where half of families send their kids to private, you’ll probably be fine because your public school demographics will reflect the benefits of high household incomes.

My child is in upper elementary that is a step right below Title I (focus school, I think?). The teachers have been caring and the school administration seems responsive and organized, but it’s clear that more resources are needed to support all students and different needs. Many students are not on grade level. On the other end, my kid is regularly bored with reading in class, but I don’t think the school has the capacity to differentiate and has to stick to the provided curriculum.

Meanwhile the central administration has spent the whole academic year talking about this regional plan (which in my opinion, favors the already successful, resourced high schools) without a peep about how to address gaps and be more innovative in earlier grades, where an academic foundation is built.

I’m happy with my kid’s education 50-75% of the time but hoping to expand our options in the future.