Anonymous wrote:I can’t believe I’ve become “that person” but I wonder if her coat was faux fur? It had a very luxurious, rich look to it and the fur looked real. But with her husband’s politics, I imagine they want to project an image of simplicity and almost “poverty” so they can relate to their constituents. Like Gwen Waltz in her TJ Maxx suits.
This is where it’s probably easier to be a Republican because they flat out don’t care if you know they’re rich, they are opulent as f, whereas the Democrats try to downplay it (even though most of them are also super rich, except for dear ol Bernie and Tim).

Anonymous wrote:If you find weird expressions in boxy dresses stunning. Call a spade a spade. The cut photoshoot did her no favors and she is very awkward. There are many other fashionable 20 somethings in Bob cuts who can pull it off better than she can.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m a 47yo Jewish lady who’s been in DC for the last 25 years and I think she looks fantastic. Love the hair, love the coat, love the boots.
Not Jewish, but same. So cute.
Anonymous wrote:I’m a 47yo Jewish lady who’s been in DC for the last 25 years and I think she looks fantastic. Love the hair, love the coat, love the boots.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Mamdani, but there is nothing unprofessional about his wife’s hairstyle. It’s neat and looks good on her. Not everyone needs blond extensions.
+1
It is also very professional for her job. She is an artist!
She has no reason to look like a boring DC lawyer. She isn't one.
This. This board is so square and unimaginative sometimes. Here is an *actually* stylish woman who has found a look that works for her in a specific way, and people here are like "hmm get rid of the bangs, grow the hair out, highlights, wear jewel tones." So freaking boring.
I love when poster reveal their true narrow-minded, judgmental selves.
I think it’s more like jealousy.
I agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Her photo shoot with The Cut was absolutely stunning.
No it was very odd and unflattering even though the Cut was aiming for a glamorous look.
I wonder if this is an age divide. I'm a younger millennial and her style is precisely on point with younger esthetics. There's serious backlash to the influencer look.
She doesn’t even dress like an influencer! Gen X women who are weight and appearance obsessed just can’t comprehend the idea of an outfit a woman might like because it’s interesting, even if it doesn’t “flatter” her figure or accentuate it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am not a fan of Mamdani, but there is nothing unprofessional about his wife’s hairstyle. It’s neat and looks good on her. Not everyone needs blond extensions.
+1
It is also very professional for her job. She is an artist!
She has no reason to look like a boring DC lawyer. She isn't one.
This. This board is so square and unimaginative sometimes. Here is an *actually* stylish woman who has found a look that works for her in a specific way, and people here are like "hmm get rid of the bangs, grow the hair out, highlights, wear jewel tones." So freaking boring.
I love when poster reveal their true narrow-minded, judgmental selves.
I think it’s more like jealousy.
Anonymous wrote:She has a really bad haircut. I know she's going for the art hoe* page boy look but it's just not professional on a nearly 30yo woman.
*"Art hoe" is the name for a style aesthetic, not me calling her a hoe for all the Boomers and Gen xers who read here