Anonymous wrote:Barnard has never been regarded as a demanding school.
Barnard's prestige stems from its NYC location and from its relationship with Ivy League Columbia University.
Anonymous wrote:Realizing this may not be a popular opinion on this board, but a bit less stress that initial 1st semester may not be a bad thing.
Anonymous wrote:I don’t really see why this matters. If she wants a demanding education, she can make her schedule as hard as possible taking physics, math, and upper div philosophy seminars. It sounds like Barnard is just easing the adjustment- which is fine.
Most schools aren’t Reed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My child has had the same freshman year experience at an Ivy (not Columbia so I can't speak to it's rigor). Classes are ridiculously easy even as a STEM major and many peers are not doing well in them (grades on tests as low as in the teens). All together a big step down in rigor and peer group from child's private high school. They got a job for 15-20 hours a week to fill the time.
I have no doubt that there are Ivies and other colleges that are still rigorous but many are not. I am not posting this to be a jerk or a snob at all but because it's been really eye opening.
Which Ivy?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:One more reason why Columbia > Barnard
They can take the same classes, and are taught by the same professors. What are you talking about?
OP here- Barnard students can't take classes at Columbia freshman year.
FWIW, she took both STEM and non-STEM classes first semester. No talk of transferring--she loves NYC and knows that she can take classes at Columbia starting next year. She was just surprised at being underwhelmed (and this is not a humblebrag- she was a very good student but not tippy top at her public school and her scores were fine but she didn't submit them at the advice of her counselor).
Not an uncommon experience.
Students from one super elite prep boarding school handled the courses so well at Harvard (found the courses easy), that Harvard sent a team to the school to understand why.
Anonymous wrote:My child has had the same freshman year experience at an Ivy (not Columbia so I can't speak to it's rigor). Classes are ridiculously easy even as a STEM major and many peers are not doing well in them (grades on tests as low as in the teens). All together a big step down in rigor and peer group from child's private high school. They got a job for 15-20 hours a week to fill the time.
I have no doubt that there are Ivies and other colleges that are still rigorous but many are not. I am not posting this to be a jerk or a snob at all but because it's been really eye opening.
Anonymous wrote:Realizing this may not be a popular opinion on this board, but a bit less stress that initial 1st semester may not be a bad thing.
Anonymous wrote:My DD is first year at Barnard and, though she loves being in the city, she is finding the classes pretty easy (and she came from a public school with a lot of grade inflation). She expected more rigor/to be challenged more and maybe that's still to come but she's underwhelmed. Anyone else?