Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US has APs.Anonymous wrote:Don’t most European countries have a highly centralized, national high school curriculum so the differences in grading and courses is largely eliminated? It seems a necessary predicate to that kind of admissions system
Not nearly the same thing.
Many UK universities treat AP Subject exam results the same as UK A-levels. So those colleges, at least, would say they are close enough.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think the US way is fine. It is the anxiety around it that is not fine and makes it seem much worse than it is.
the anxiety is due to the opaque US style of admissions.
The way other countries do it, it's pretty clear cut.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:European way, at least in the UK, is also somewhat holistic. Academic proficiency matters more there, though, and I think they consider the right mix of holistic and academic qualifications.
Not sure their system would work in the US unless we also switched to making kids lock in their majors when they enter college. For example, great math and physics test scores are going to matter if you want to major in physics, but not so much history.
Top U.K. schools practice hardcore DEI to ensure that they are not completely dominated by private school kids.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. Why should we change our ways to better suit immigrants? If it worked best wherever they came from they wouldn't have come here.
Because immigrants are good for university communities and for the United States.
Anonymous wrote:No.
I think we need a limit on apps or to abolish the common app or something. The process now is broken compared to when most of us applied.
But the Asian approach of high stakes testing sounds miserable for kids and I want no part of that. I think we would end up closer to that version then the European model if we went to tests only.
Anonymous wrote:I think the US way is fine. It is the anxiety around it that is not fine and makes it seem much worse than it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:European way, at least in the UK, is also somewhat holistic. Academic proficiency matters more there, though, and I think they consider the right mix of holistic and academic qualifications.
Not sure their system would work in the US unless we also switched to making kids lock in their majors when they enter college. For example, great math and physics test scores are going to matter if you want to major in physics, but not so much history.
+1 Europeans lock in much earlier to their course of study as teens. And most European colleges are much more focused on that course of study too---definitely not as many electives that are not related to their primary focus (i.e. major). More practical I guess, but I prefer the American way which allows a bit more freedom for a teenager to change their mind about what to do.
Except that nowadays they need to be locked into a “narrative” from the age of 14 to get into one of these elite colleges. If you think teens should have the freedom to explore their interests you should hate everything about the current American admissions process.
Anonymous wrote:No. Why should we change our ways to better suit immigrants? If it worked best wherever they came from they wouldn't have come here.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US has APs.Anonymous wrote:Don’t most European countries have a highly centralized, national high school curriculum so the differences in grading and courses is largely eliminated? It seems a necessary predicate to that kind of admissions system
Not nearly the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:No. Why should we change our ways to better suit immigrants? If it worked best wherever they came from they wouldn't have come here.
We have changed our ways quite a lot to better suit elite private colleges’ craving for ever-lower acceptance rates.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:US has APs.Anonymous wrote:Don’t most European countries have a highly centralized, national high school curriculum so the differences in grading and courses is largely eliminated? It seems a necessary predicate to that kind of admissions system
Not nearly the same thing.