Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP if you feel ok doing so, give your state or county so we can give you some attorney recs. You sound stuck and like you might be in a pretty imbalanced and maybe even manipulative or controlling relationship, and as a random stranger on the internet, it’s hard to read this and not be able to step in to help.
If you were my friend, I’d be setting up appointments for you today and would sit with you during the zooms or take you to your initial consults. Please be a friend to yourself.
OP here, thank you for this kind response. We are in D.C. My spouse is just trying to protect himself, taking into account his age and unpredictable income (he is self-employed in an industry that can have good years and lean years, and the last few years have been pretty lean).
OP again - I did speak with an attorney about 18 months ago, when I knew I wanted to divorce but wasn't ready to pull the trigger yet. So I can go back to her for another consultation to frame my initial "offer" to my husband.
Anonymous wrote:I am an actuary who used to do QDROs. What’s being split in half is not the total pension, but effectively the pension earned during the marriage. I understand that you are dealing with something like a 401K, not a pension, but the underlying principle for fairness should be similar.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think you've gotten some good math here, but I do agree that a consult with a lawyer might be good to give you a realistic idea of what the law would say.
So then you have a better idea, and you can go to him with a range of options. Here's what the law says, but what if we did X, or shifted from X to Y, or balanced things this way or that way?
I'd also think through very carefully what you expect to need. Depending on your state, college costs may be on or off the table (in terms of child suport). Given expected inheritance, are you willing to forego some of his retirement for maybe a lump sum put into college costs? Given his age, and you not working, how were those costs going to be covered?
It may be given his anxiety around retirement, that you could lay out scenarios that protect his retirement but give you other things of equal weight. Given his age, he must be concerned about being forced to work longer. His retirement is not large and there are teenage costs looming - college for one but also maybe a car, or even the travel to visit college options, higher expenses for high school, etc.
What about the house or other marital property?
Do not, under any circumstances, make any life decisions based on an "expected inheritance"! That inheritance can very quickly get eaten up in long-term care. It is just straight-up dumb to live your life based on a contingency you don't control.
This is a good point. Taking less in a divorce because of an expected inheritance is idiotic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP if you feel ok doing so, give your state or county so we can give you some attorney recs. You sound stuck and like you might be in a pretty imbalanced and maybe even manipulative or controlling relationship, and as a random stranger on the internet, it’s hard to read this and not be able to step in to help.
If you were my friend, I’d be setting up appointments for you today and would sit with you during the zooms or take you to your initial consults. Please be a friend to yourself.
OP here, thank you for this kind response. We are in D.C. My spouse is just trying to protect himself, taking into account his age and unpredictable income (he is self-employed in an industry that can have good years and lean years, and the last few years have been pretty lean).
Anonymous wrote:OP if you feel ok doing so, give your state or county so we can give you some attorney recs. You sound stuck and like you might be in a pretty imbalanced and maybe even manipulative or controlling relationship, and as a random stranger on the internet, it’s hard to read this and not be able to step in to help.
If you were my friend, I’d be setting up appointments for you today and would sit with you during the zooms or take you to your initial consults. Please be a friend to yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Half his retirement fund, half the joint account, plus alimony since you're not working and child support for your child. Did he not think he was going to split retirement with you when you got married? Without a pre-nup, you should assume he intended for you to have half of any money he came in with.
She's not entitled to half his retirement when they didn't even get married until he was past 50 and had already saved most of it. Get real.
To beat a dead horse: she is entitled to half his retirement. Legally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I agree you're not really entitled to what he saved up before you met. I'd probably ask for 200,000 of the non-retirement funds plus generous child support.
The law and the expired pre-nup say otherwise. Attorney, OP! This is not the amicable divorce he wants you to believe it is.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Half his retirement fund, half the joint account, plus alimony since you're not working and child support for your child. Did he not think he was going to split retirement with you when you got married? Without a pre-nup, you should assume he intended for you to have half of any money he came in with.
She's not entitled to half his retirement when they didn't even get married until he was past 50 and had already saved most of it. Get real.
Anonymous wrote:We met and married later in life (me late 30s, him about 50). Thirteen years later, we are divorcing. We have one child, in elementary school. We want to do this without lawyers. There are no disagreements about dividing property, but he is afraid I'm going to take him to the cleaners, which I don't intend to do. Still, I am not sure what is a fair division of our money. He doesn't think I'm entitled to any of his retirement funds, since he had already saved a lot of it (probably most) before we met. He is mid-60s, self-employed, has variable income (not much lately), and no inheritance coming. I am 50, stopped working 18 months ago to care for family, and do expect some inheritance eventually (not f$#%-you money, but maybe around $2M).
Here is what we have:
$670K non-retirement funds between us ($40K mine, $400K his, $230K in a joint account)
About $1.5M retirement funds between us ($285K mine, $1.2M his)
The money conversation is already contentious, because of his fear of losing what he worked for before we met, but he told me to "tell him what I want" as a starting point. I don't even know where to begin.
Anonymous wrote:Also, your marriage is not considered a long term marriage, so you won't be entitled to any spousal support, especially since you could easily return to work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's not guilt. It's wanting to do good by a person you probably still care about but you just don't want to be their spouse any longer.
Bullsh*t. He needs to do good by her too, which means she gets what she is entitled to to support herself and her child.
Anonymous wrote:I agree you're not really entitled to what he saved up before you met. I'd probably ask for 200,000 of the non-retirement funds plus generous child support.
Anonymous wrote:It's not guilt. It's wanting to do good by a person you probably still care about but you just don't want to be their spouse any longer.