Anonymous wrote:Gee, I don’t know “what to make” of whether current Golden Globe nominee Jennifer Lawrence is “still relevant” or not, OP…

Golden Globes, the same awards body whose president assaulted Brendan Fraser and the same awards body that was caught being wined and dined by the Emily and Paris production team so they would give them awards? Are you daft? Why are you treating these awards like they're the Oscars?

Anonymous wrote:Gee, I don’t know “what to make” of whether current Golden Globe nominee Jennifer Lawrence is “still relevant” or not, OP…

Why did you even bump this thread?

Gee, I don’t know “what to make” of whether current Golden Globe nominee Jennifer Lawrence is “still relevant” or not, OP…

She’s married with a couple kids now. A lot of actresses cut back on roles while they’re raising a family - Jessica Alba, Eva Mendes, Cameron Diaz, etc. They don’t want to leave their families for weeks/months at a time.

Once her kids are older, she’ll probably have a bigger comeback.

I’m vaguely annoyed by the way this has turned into a Sydney Sweeney thread, but the Jlaw defenders in here are insufferable and dumb, so have at it I guess.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She looks good and she is confident and "likable" I have never seen a performance by her that has actually knocked it out the park.

Sidney Sweeney is a more talented performer, all the noise about politics, boobs etc aside. I've seen films she is in where her performances have been much better than those of JL

Agree; Sweeney is a rising star and incredibly talented.

She looks stoned 900% of the time and sounds kind of garbled when she talks. Unsure what you’re seeing there beyond the obvious she’s not a good actress. The only thing she’s done that seemed effective was handmaid’s Tale and her character was completely unlikable and kind of stupid, so it might’ve just been her face.

Anonymous wrote:Not hot. Not interesting. Not relevant. Not even good enough for Hallmark movies. She had her 15 minutes of fame. It’s Sweeney Time!

Sydney has the distinction of starring in the biggest box office bomb in history. I believe before her, it was Blake lively’s rhythm section that held the distinction for the biggest cinematic bomb in history.

Sydney’s career is taking a big hit. I believe her people saw this coming and that’s why she was doing all the endorsements lately. Jeans! Soap! Ice cream! These are not the moves of someone who has an acting career ahead of them.

I’ve always wondered about Harvey Weinstein and her.

Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I feel about her as an actress, not very appealing to me. I just couldn’t get over the fact that she dropped out of middle school! And I don’t consider myself an education snob at all.

I'm not a big fan, but she did manage to become an A list star and make millions of dollars. It seems petty to fault her for dropping out when she's clearly wildly successful. She obviously made the right choice for her.

Not hot. Not interesting. Not relevant. Not even good enough for Hallmark movies. She had her 15 minutes of fame. It’s Sweeney Time!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:She can be annoying in interviews. she's not very educated I think she left school at 14 or 15 yrs old.

She also had her woo-woo and naked boobs all over the internet when the photos she sent to Nicholas Hoult were hacked / leaked.

And then there are the stories about Harvey Weinstein.

Her personal photos to her boyfriend were hacked and put on the internet and you count that as a point against her?

That she ever took and sent such photos is the point against her. Catch up.

WTF is wrong with you? She sent photos to a boyfriend. Is that you, Granny?

Firstly agism is unnecessary here, I'm likely a lot younger than you.
Anyone who takes nudies and sends them via an electronic device, is a fool. 100% idiot.

Anonymous wrote:“Do you think this celebrity whose name you instantly recognized in the thread title and who has an Oscar is ‘still relevant’”

Imagine how dumb you sound, OP.

You sound very stupid, no offense. It's possible to have high name recognition but experience a decline in relevancy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:“Do you think this celebrity whose name you instantly recognized in the thread title and who has an Oscar is ‘still relevant’”

Imagine how dumb you sound, OP.

I think it's the same poster who asked if Glen Powell would ever become a movie star, when I can't turn on the TV without see a new movie of his. It's clearly to put them down and make her feel better about her own irrelevance.

I can't imagine wanting to be famous, it sounds awful. Enjoy being nobody with the rest of us, at least we can get a cup of coffee without hiring security.

You seem to be taking things way too personally. Is Jlaw your client?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Not sure how I feel about her as an actress, not very appealing to me. I just couldn’t get over the fact that she dropped out of middle school! And I don’t consider myself an education snob at all.

She’s probably learned a lot, traveling the world and working with top-tier producers, directors, actors, dialect coaches, cinematographers, publicists, stylists and entertainment lawyers…

She’s taken many lovers over the years and has a fetish for buttplugs.

Anonymous wrote:She can be annoying in interviews. she's not very educated I think she left school at 14 or 15 yrs old.

That's probably a plus these days, as bad as public education has gotten in the last couple decades.