Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple rules that will prevent you from being pulled over by police:

1. Keep your vehicle registration valid
2. Stay off your cellphone
3. Use turn signals
4. Don’t speed
5. Don’t drive recklessly
6. Don’t make illegal turns
7. Come to a complete stop at red lights and stop signs
8. Operate your vehicle within marked lanes
9. Stop for pedestrians in crosswalks
10. Don’t tailgate

These rules are White coded.

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Simple rules that will prevent you from being pulled over by police:

1. Keep your vehicle registration valid
2. Stay off your cellphone
3. Use turn signals
4. Don’t speed
5. Don’t drive recklessly
6. Don’t make illegal turns
7. Come to a complete stop at red lights and stop signs
8. Operate your vehicle within marked lanes
9. Stop for pedestrians in crosswalks
10. Don’t tailgate

These rules are White coded.

Anonymous wrote:Simple rules that will prevent you from being pulled over by police:

1. Keep your vehicle registration valid
2. Stay off your cellphone
3. Use turn signals
4. Don’t speed
5. Don’t drive recklessly
6. Don’t make illegal turns
7. Come to a complete stop at red lights and stop signs
8. Operate your vehicle within marked lanes
9. Stop for pedestrians in crosswalks
10. Don’t tailgate

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

What makes you even think that. Of course it can replace them. One of the best fields to do so and already in the works worldwide in major countries. Is basically becoming a thing in parts of China now.

There is no way. Law enforcement will be one of the last professions standing. I’d love for you to explain how it could happen.

OCP disagrees.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

So murder is the solution, or just duels at ten paces?

Or don't attack people and start things? Is that hard to understand?

That’s what criminals do. Many are armed.

Exactly! Hence the PP comment about being well armed to prevent or stop that. Simple. No police required.

That’s how gunfights start. I suggest the PP get a lot of TEMS/TECC training to hopefully keep themselves alive until the paramedics can get to them.

So police cause gunfights? Makes sense, since they are the #2 demographic for people being shot in the USA now.

Perhaps if they didn't try to enforce so many ridiculous laws with Barny Fife on steroids attitude like you have, they'd kill less people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

So murder is the solution, or just duels at ten paces?

Or don't attack people and start things? Is that hard to understand?

That’s what criminals do. Many are armed.

Exactly! Hence the PP comment about being well armed to prevent or stop that. Simple. No police required.

That’s how gunfights start. I suggest the PP get a lot of TEMS/TECC training to hopefully keep themselves alive until the paramedics can get to them.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Broken window policing by a different name. It's racist.

Agree, completely racist.

No human being wants to be a criminal; they are forced into it by the system.

A better approach is to respect people’s dignity and human rights by providing the wrap-around service to which they are entitled.

I don’t disagree on either point. But, at the end of the day, decisions still need to made about where and how to allocate police resources. But what’s the alternative to using data to make those decisions? Using gut feelings and political pressure? Is that better?

The solution is to dismantle and defund the police. We need less so-called "law enforcement," not more.

This.
Americans are sufficiently armed, that police are not needed like in a country where everyone is helpless and disarmed.

So murder is the solution, or just duels at ten paces?

Or don't attack people and start things? Is that hard to understand?

That’s what criminals do. Many are armed.

Exactly! Hence the PP comment about being well armed to prevent or stop that. Simple. No police required.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

Is the AI sending police to the White House? That’s where the biggest crimes are occurring, along with malicious, stupid decisions directly leading to people’s harm and death.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:AI can’t replace the law enforcement function, but it is already being utilized to aggregate and analyze data to better focus efforts towards locations that warrant a reallocation of resources. That should benefit the law abiding citizens in areas that the police plus up their efforts. Hopefully technology and its utilization continues to evolve in a way that helps provide greater public safety.

Is the AI sending police to the White House? That’s where the biggest crimes are occurring, along with malicious, stupid decisions directly leading to people’s harm and death.