Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read the whole thing. The craziest part of this to me (besides the wife being willing to take him back, which is BONKERS) is that he came so, so, so close to getting away with it. If it wasn’t for that lake guy being so persistent he would have gotten away with it.
True but it was pretty dumb of the local cops to not have entered the kayaker as a missing person. They spent 30K and untold manhours dredging a lake, when they could have just run the guy's passport and realized he had escaped through Canada pretty early on.
One of the officers recommended against reporting him as missing. It’s unclear why.
Do you think there's any implication here there was a man on the inside?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read the whole thing. The craziest part of this to me (besides the wife being willing to take him back, which is BONKERS) is that he came so, so, so close to getting away with it. If it wasn’t for that lake guy being so persistent he would have gotten away with it.
True but it was pretty dumb of the local cops to not have entered the kayaker as a missing person. They spent 30K and untold manhours dredging a lake, when they could have just run the guy's passport and realized he had escaped through Canada pretty early on.
One of the officers recommended against reporting him as missing. It’s unclear why.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read the whole thing. The craziest part of this to me (besides the wife being willing to take him back, which is BONKERS) is that he came so, so, so close to getting away with it. If it wasn’t for that lake guy being so persistent he would have gotten away with it.
True but it was pretty dumb of the local cops to not have entered the kayaker as a missing person. They spent 30K and untold manhours dredging a lake, when they could have just run the guy's passport and realized he had escaped through Canada pretty early on.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I read the whole thing. The craziest part of this to me (besides the wife being willing to take him back, which is BONKERS) is that he came so, so, so close to getting away with it. If it wasn’t for that lake guy being so persistent he would have gotten away with it.
True but it was pretty dumb of the local cops to not have entered the kayaker as a missing person. They spent 30K and untold manhours dredging a lake, when they could have just run the guy's passport and realized he had escaped through Canada pretty early on.
Anonymous wrote:I read the whole thing. The craziest part of this to me (besides the wife being willing to take him back, which is BONKERS) is that he came so, so, so close to getting away with it. If it wasn’t for that lake guy being so persistent he would have gotten away with it.